{"title":"Introduction to Special Issue: Qualitative Research Methodologies and Methods for Theory Building in Human Resource Development","authors":"J. Lester","doi":"10.1177/15344843221146871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, social science researchers have had to identify new ways of conceptualizing and conducting research (Nind et al., 2021). This has been particularly true for qualitative researchers, as many have been required to rethink how to study meaning-making practices (e.g., Rahman et al., 2021; VindrolaPadros et al., 2020). This re-thinking has led many qualitative researchers to work with new and emerging digital tools to collect and analyze data, as well as engage with new forms of data in a range of digital spaces (Paulus & Lester, 2022). Some scholars have begun to write and think about how this historical moment might shape how we envision the very doing of qualitative research in the future, while recognizing that qualitative researchers have long been engaged with digital tools and in digital spaces (e.g., Fielding et al., 2008). Indeed, the idea of historical moments shaping methodology is not new to qualitative researchers, as all methodological practices arise at particular socio-political moments and are shaped by the conditions under which they are developed. As Morse (2020) noted:","PeriodicalId":51474,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"7 - 14"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221146871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, social science researchers have had to identify new ways of conceptualizing and conducting research (Nind et al., 2021). This has been particularly true for qualitative researchers, as many have been required to rethink how to study meaning-making practices (e.g., Rahman et al., 2021; VindrolaPadros et al., 2020). This re-thinking has led many qualitative researchers to work with new and emerging digital tools to collect and analyze data, as well as engage with new forms of data in a range of digital spaces (Paulus & Lester, 2022). Some scholars have begun to write and think about how this historical moment might shape how we envision the very doing of qualitative research in the future, while recognizing that qualitative researchers have long been engaged with digital tools and in digital spaces (e.g., Fielding et al., 2008). Indeed, the idea of historical moments shaping methodology is not new to qualitative researchers, as all methodological practices arise at particular socio-political moments and are shaped by the conditions under which they are developed. As Morse (2020) noted:
期刊介绍:
As described elsewhere, Human Resource Development Review is a theory development journal for scholars of human resource development and related disciplines. Human Resource Development Review publishes articles that make theoretical contributions on theory development, foundations of HRD, theory building methods, and integrative reviews of the relevant literature. Papers whose central focus is empirical findings, including empirical method and design are not considered for publication in Human Resource Development Review. This journal encourages submissions that provide new theoretical insights to advance our understanding of human resource development and related disciplines. Such papers may include syntheses of existing bodies of theory, new substantive theories, exploratory conceptual models, taxonomies and typology developed as foundations for theory, treatises in formal theory construction, papers on the history of theory, critique of theory that includes alternative research propositions, metatheory, and integrative literature reviews with strong theoretical implications. Papers addressing foundations of HRD might address philosophies of HRD, historical foundations, definitions of the field, conceptual organization of the field, and ethical foundations. Human Resource Development Review takes a multi-paradigm view of theory building so submissions from different paradigms are encouraged.