Assessing the moderating role of the extent of implementation of lean methods in predicting productivity improvement

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS RAUSP Management Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1108/rausp-08-2022-0196
Vikas Singla, Sachin Sharma
{"title":"Assessing the moderating role of the extent of implementation of lean methods in predicting productivity improvement","authors":"Vikas Singla, Sachin Sharma","doi":"10.1108/rausp-08-2022-0196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe study aims to explore the argument of implementing the lean method to part or whole of an operation by examining the moderating impact of varying levels of the extent of implementation of four different lean methods, along with their functionalities, in predicting productivity improvement (PI).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAs the focus of understanding the efficacy of lean principles is shifting from process to industry level, this study tried to generalize the approach by gathering data from 132 large Indian auto component manufacturers. This involves an assessing/monitoring approach rather than measurement.\n\n\nFindings\nResults highlighted the interdependence or individuality of the extent of implementation of lean methods and their functionalities. Findings revealed a significant moderating effect in improving productivity to a greater extent of 50%.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nAdopting an assessment approach to a measurement study provides a noteworthy contribution to bridging theory and practical consequences. The findings can be appropriately extrapolated to medium and small enterprises forming a critical connection in the entire automobile manufacturing ecosystem.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study showed that even if a lean method is applied to a certain extent of operations the chances of PI are significant. This is important for decision makers as they confront problems of optimum resource allocation.\n\n\nSocial implications\nPI, reduced cost and generalization of results would enable the auto component industry to become more competitive.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe examination of the moderation effect of a lean principle implementation extent, along with that of its functionalities to predict the improvement in productivity from its existing level, is a major outcome of this study.\n","PeriodicalId":43400,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-08-2022-0196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The study aims to explore the argument of implementing the lean method to part or whole of an operation by examining the moderating impact of varying levels of the extent of implementation of four different lean methods, along with their functionalities, in predicting productivity improvement (PI). Design/methodology/approach As the focus of understanding the efficacy of lean principles is shifting from process to industry level, this study tried to generalize the approach by gathering data from 132 large Indian auto component manufacturers. This involves an assessing/monitoring approach rather than measurement. Findings Results highlighted the interdependence or individuality of the extent of implementation of lean methods and their functionalities. Findings revealed a significant moderating effect in improving productivity to a greater extent of 50%. Research limitations/implications Adopting an assessment approach to a measurement study provides a noteworthy contribution to bridging theory and practical consequences. The findings can be appropriately extrapolated to medium and small enterprises forming a critical connection in the entire automobile manufacturing ecosystem. Practical implications The study showed that even if a lean method is applied to a certain extent of operations the chances of PI are significant. This is important for decision makers as they confront problems of optimum resource allocation. Social implications PI, reduced cost and generalization of results would enable the auto component industry to become more competitive. Originality/value The examination of the moderation effect of a lean principle implementation extent, along with that of its functionalities to predict the improvement in productivity from its existing level, is a major outcome of this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估精益方法实施程度在预测生产力提高中的调节作用
目的:本研究旨在通过考察四种不同精益方法的实施程度的不同水平及其功能在预测生产率改进(PI)方面的调节影响,探讨将精益方法实施到部分或全部操作的论点。设计/方法/途径由于了解精益原则的有效性的重点正在从过程层面转移到行业层面,本研究试图通过收集来自132家印度大型汽车零部件制造商的数据来推广这种方法。这涉及到评估/监测方法,而不是测量方法。研究结果强调了精益方法及其功能的实施程度的相互依赖或个性。研究结果显示,在提高生产率方面有显著的调节作用,达到50%以上。研究的局限性/意义采用评估方法进行测量研究,为连接理论和实际结果提供了值得注意的贡献。研究结果可以适当地外推到在整个汽车制造生态系统中形成关键联系的中小企业。实际意义研究表明,即使精益方法应用于一定程度的操作,PI的机会也是显著的。这对决策者来说很重要,因为他们面临着最佳资源分配的问题。社会意义spi,降低成本和推广结果将使汽车零部件行业变得更具竞争力。原创性/价值检验精益原则实施程度的调节效应,以及其预测生产力从现有水平提高的功能,是本研究的主要成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring off-chain voting and blockchain in decentralized autonomous organizations Entrepreneurial intentions and the role of educational and social support: do the self-efficacy and the theory of planned behavior variables matter? Corporate reputation in Brazil: do board characteristics matter? Motivation for women’s football: a competing scales study Understanding the role of physical trial for good shopping decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1