Assessing decontamination practices at a medical microbiology research laboratory

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jobb.2022.08.002
Merna M. Alfy, Sherine B. El Sayed, Mona El-Shokry
{"title":"Assessing decontamination practices at a medical microbiology research laboratory","authors":"Merna M. Alfy,&nbsp;Sherine B. El Sayed,&nbsp;Mona El-Shokry","doi":"10.1016/j.jobb.2022.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To our knowledge, this is the first study to conduct an objective assessment of the routine decontamination practices at a medical microbiology research laboratory (MRL) a year after a biosafety training was provided to all laboratory staff. Between March 28th and June 28th, 2021, unobtrusive observations were carried out to identify-three high-touch surfaces at the MRL during different working hours. Swabbing was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the disinfectant used in the laboratory. All three high-touch surfaces were sampled before and after decontamination with 200 ppm of 5 % sodium hypochlorite (household bleach) to quantify the microbial load and identify the types of organisms residing on the laboratory surfaces. A higher concentration (500 ppm) of 5 % sodium hypochlorite was employed after refresher training was provided to housekeeping staff, and resampling of the three surfaces was carried out during a 4-week follow-up period using the same procedure. The three high-touch surfaces identified were the two sides of the workbench (22 %–24 %) and the front surface of one incubator (14 %). <em>Anthracoid bacilli</em> and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> were the most commonly found organisms on laboratory surfaces pre-intervention (100 % and 89 %, respectively) and post-intervention (56 % and 44 %, respectively). Other microorganisms detected included <em>Salmonella</em> spp. (27.7 %), <em>Proteus</em> spp. (5.6 %), <em>Escherichia coli</em> (5.6 %), and <em>Klebsiella</em> spp. (33.3 %). Employing a higher concentration (500 ppm) of sodium hypochlorite significantly (p ≤ 0.000) reduced the total aerobic colony count from an average of 15–250 cfu/cm<sup>2</sup> to 10–60 cfu/cm<sup>2</sup>. This study demonstrated suboptimal decontamination practices at the MRL and the need to apply a higher concentration (500 ppm) of sodium hypochlorite to reduce the overall microbial load. It also demonstrated the importance of quantitative assessment to monitor decontamination practices and ensure staff compliance. More studies are needed to identify bacterial communities within the laboratory, which will help provide guidance regarding the types, proper concentrations, and appropriateness of the in -use disinfectants. Furthermore, large-scale studies on the acceptable level of residual contamination following any decontamination process are urgently recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 124-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933822000218/pdfft?md5=88c0b4e1a3c5a3fc55edd6942c2cd7bf&pid=1-s2.0-S2588933822000218-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933822000218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

To our knowledge, this is the first study to conduct an objective assessment of the routine decontamination practices at a medical microbiology research laboratory (MRL) a year after a biosafety training was provided to all laboratory staff. Between March 28th and June 28th, 2021, unobtrusive observations were carried out to identify-three high-touch surfaces at the MRL during different working hours. Swabbing was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the disinfectant used in the laboratory. All three high-touch surfaces were sampled before and after decontamination with 200 ppm of 5 % sodium hypochlorite (household bleach) to quantify the microbial load and identify the types of organisms residing on the laboratory surfaces. A higher concentration (500 ppm) of 5 % sodium hypochlorite was employed after refresher training was provided to housekeeping staff, and resampling of the three surfaces was carried out during a 4-week follow-up period using the same procedure. The three high-touch surfaces identified were the two sides of the workbench (22 %–24 %) and the front surface of one incubator (14 %). Anthracoid bacilli and Staphylococcus aureus were the most commonly found organisms on laboratory surfaces pre-intervention (100 % and 89 %, respectively) and post-intervention (56 % and 44 %, respectively). Other microorganisms detected included Salmonella spp. (27.7 %), Proteus spp. (5.6 %), Escherichia coli (5.6 %), and Klebsiella spp. (33.3 %). Employing a higher concentration (500 ppm) of sodium hypochlorite significantly (p ≤ 0.000) reduced the total aerobic colony count from an average of 15–250 cfu/cm2 to 10–60 cfu/cm2. This study demonstrated suboptimal decontamination practices at the MRL and the need to apply a higher concentration (500 ppm) of sodium hypochlorite to reduce the overall microbial load. It also demonstrated the importance of quantitative assessment to monitor decontamination practices and ensure staff compliance. More studies are needed to identify bacterial communities within the laboratory, which will help provide guidance regarding the types, proper concentrations, and appropriateness of the in -use disinfectants. Furthermore, large-scale studies on the acceptable level of residual contamination following any decontamination process are urgently recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医学微生物研究实验室的去污做法
据我们所知,这是首次对医学微生物学研究实验室(MRL)所有实验室人员进行生物安全培训一年后的常规去污做法进行客观评估的研究。在2021年3月28日至6月28日期间,在不同的工作时间对MRL进行了三个高接触面的非显眼观测。用拭子法评价实验室使用的消毒剂的有效性。在用200 ppm的5%次氯酸钠(家用漂白剂)去污前后,对所有三个高接触表面进行采样,以量化微生物负荷并确定居住在实验室表面的生物类型。在对家政人员进行进修培训后,使用了更高浓度(500 ppm)的5%次氯酸钠,并在4周的随访期间使用相同的程序对三个表面进行了重新采样。确定的三个高接触表面是工作台的两侧(22% - 24%)和一个培养箱的前表面(14%)。类炭疽杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌是干预前(分别为100%和89%)和干预后(分别为56%和44%)实验室表面最常见的微生物。检出的其他微生物包括沙门氏菌(27.7%)、变形杆菌(5.6%)、大肠杆菌(5.6%)和克雷伯氏菌(33.3%)。使用较高浓度(500 ppm)的次氯酸钠显著(p≤0.000)将总需氧菌落计数从平均15-250 cfu/cm2降低到10-60 cfu/cm2。该研究表明,MRL的去污操作并不理想,需要使用更高浓度(500ppm)的次氯酸钠来减少总体微生物负荷。它还表明了定量评估对监测除污做法和确保工作人员遵守规定的重要性。需要更多的研究来确定实验室内的细菌群落,这将有助于为使用中的消毒剂的类型、适当浓度和适当性提供指导。此外,迫切建议对任何净化过程后残留污染的可接受水平进行大规模研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
41 days
期刊最新文献
Transformative advances in veterinary laboratory practices: Evaluating the impact of preliminary training in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces of Pakistan Lessons for biosecurity education from the International Nuclear Security Education Network A stochastic epidemic model with time delays and unreported cases based on Markovian switching Numerical simulations of a two-strain dengue model to investigate the efficacy of the deployment of Wolbachia-carrying mosquitoes and vaccination for reducing the incidence of dengue infections Genetic diversity, virulence profiles, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolated from typhoid fever patients in Baghdad, Iraq
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1