Contesting natural resource development in Canada: The legacies and limits of the staples approach

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY British Journal of Canadian Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.3828/BJCS.2018.12
P. Bowles, F. MacPhail
{"title":"Contesting natural resource development in Canada: The legacies and limits of the staples approach","authors":"P. Bowles, F. MacPhail","doi":"10.3828/BJCS.2018.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Harold Innis (1930) famously described Canada as a country comprised of 'hewers of wood and drawers of water'. The staples approach that he advanced and which his followers subsequently further developed has become a reference point for continuing debate over the economic importance and consequences of natural resource development in Canada, a debate reignited by the long commodities boom of 2000–14. In this article we examine another, overlooked legacy of the staples approach, namely, the ways in which its emphasis on linkages has provided a frame of reference for opponents of natural resource projects. This is illustrated by examining some of the contemporary contestations of resource projects in northern British Columbia. These examples also show, however, that the staples approach provides only a partial frame of reference for contemporary contestations; more recent concerns such as Indigenous rights, procedural fairness, and environmental issues also play a significant role in oppositional politics to resource projects. Nevertheless, our discussion shows that Canada at 150 is still debating the role that natural resource development should play, and that the legacy of the staples approach continues to play a role in the debate.","PeriodicalId":41591,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"167 - 179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3828/BJCS.2018.12","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/BJCS.2018.12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:Harold Innis (1930) famously described Canada as a country comprised of 'hewers of wood and drawers of water'. The staples approach that he advanced and which his followers subsequently further developed has become a reference point for continuing debate over the economic importance and consequences of natural resource development in Canada, a debate reignited by the long commodities boom of 2000–14. In this article we examine another, overlooked legacy of the staples approach, namely, the ways in which its emphasis on linkages has provided a frame of reference for opponents of natural resource projects. This is illustrated by examining some of the contemporary contestations of resource projects in northern British Columbia. These examples also show, however, that the staples approach provides only a partial frame of reference for contemporary contestations; more recent concerns such as Indigenous rights, procedural fairness, and environmental issues also play a significant role in oppositional politics to resource projects. Nevertheless, our discussion shows that Canada at 150 is still debating the role that natural resource development should play, and that the legacy of the staples approach continues to play a role in the debate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大自然资源开发之争:主食方法的遗产与限制
摘要:哈罗德·英尼斯(Harold Innis,1930)将加拿大描述为一个由“伐木工人和挑水工”组成的国家。他提出的、他的追随者随后进一步发展的主食方法已成为关于加拿大自然资源开发的经济重要性和后果的持续辩论的参考点,2000-2004年的长期大宗商品繁荣重新引发了这场辩论。在这篇文章中,我们研究了staples方法的另一个被忽视的遗留问题,即它对联系的强调为反对自然资源项目的人提供了一个参考框架。这可以通过考察不列颠哥伦比亚省北部的一些当代资源项目争论来说明。然而,这些例子也表明,斯台普斯方法只为当代争论提供了部分参考框架;最近关注的问题,如土著权利、程序公平和环境问题,也在反对资源项目的政治中发挥了重要作用。尽管如此,我们的讨论表明,150岁的加拿大仍在辩论自然资源开发应发挥的作用,主食方法的遗产继续在辩论中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Canadian Studies
British Journal of Canadian Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Notes on contributors The ‘spiritual borderlands’ of the far Canadian north: the ministries of William Carpenter Bompas and Robert McDonald in comparative context Index of Articles and Reviews in Volume 35 ‘We cannot go without a National Organization any longer’: the struggle to build unity in Canada’s National Indian Council, 1961–1968 Important Notice: Distribution of British Journal of Canadian Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1