Reassures Me There Are People Around Who Care about Me: Analyzing Meanings of Support for People with Epilepsy

C. Walker, C. Peterson
{"title":"Reassures Me There Are People Around Who Care about Me: Analyzing Meanings of Support for People with Epilepsy","authors":"C. Walker, C. Peterson","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims  The study aimed to examine the nature and outcomes of social support for the well-being and quality of life (QoL) of adults with epilepsy. Methods  The Australian Epilepsy Longitudinal Survey's 5 th Wave included the Medical Outcomes Study Modified Social Support Survey on four dimensions of social support and the QOLIE-31. Both numerical data and open-ended responses were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. A mixed method was used where quantitative analysis used t -tests, analysis of variance and block recursive regression, and qualitative analysis identified themes. Results  Three-hundred thirty-two people with epilepsy (PWE) participated. The quantitative component showed that for emotional/informational support being older and living alone were key factors. These as well as household income were important in tangible support. For affectionate support living alone and household income were factors, but only income was a factor for positive social interaction. In addition, only positive social interaction predicted increased QoL. In the qualitative component of the study both positive and negative supports were identified for the emotional/informational supports. Many reported the benefits of having information, although some reported failure to have their needs taken seriously by health professionals or epilepsy associations. Inability to drive was an important feature of negative tangible support as was finding some assistive services unaffordable. Reports of positive social interaction identified being accepted as a person with epilepsy that is the primary concern. Peer support plays a role here. Discussion  The findings of factors affecting the four dimensions of support in this study have supported a number of studies. This includes the effects of positive social interaction on QoL. The qualitative analysis supports these results, but it also contributes to deeper understanding of support in the lives of PWE. Conclusion  Social support is a particularly important issue for PWE. The results of this study demonstrate the complexities and benefits of obtaining the appropriate forms of support. This survey took place before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and it may well be that this phenomenon affects PWE's support needs.","PeriodicalId":38086,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Epilepsy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aims  The study aimed to examine the nature and outcomes of social support for the well-being and quality of life (QoL) of adults with epilepsy. Methods  The Australian Epilepsy Longitudinal Survey's 5 th Wave included the Medical Outcomes Study Modified Social Support Survey on four dimensions of social support and the QOLIE-31. Both numerical data and open-ended responses were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. A mixed method was used where quantitative analysis used t -tests, analysis of variance and block recursive regression, and qualitative analysis identified themes. Results  Three-hundred thirty-two people with epilepsy (PWE) participated. The quantitative component showed that for emotional/informational support being older and living alone were key factors. These as well as household income were important in tangible support. For affectionate support living alone and household income were factors, but only income was a factor for positive social interaction. In addition, only positive social interaction predicted increased QoL. In the qualitative component of the study both positive and negative supports were identified for the emotional/informational supports. Many reported the benefits of having information, although some reported failure to have their needs taken seriously by health professionals or epilepsy associations. Inability to drive was an important feature of negative tangible support as was finding some assistive services unaffordable. Reports of positive social interaction identified being accepted as a person with epilepsy that is the primary concern. Peer support plays a role here. Discussion  The findings of factors affecting the four dimensions of support in this study have supported a number of studies. This includes the effects of positive social interaction on QoL. The qualitative analysis supports these results, but it also contributes to deeper understanding of support in the lives of PWE. Conclusion  Social support is a particularly important issue for PWE. The results of this study demonstrate the complexities and benefits of obtaining the appropriate forms of support. This survey took place before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and it may well be that this phenomenon affects PWE's support needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让我放心,身边有人关心我:分析对癫痫患者支持的意义
摘要目的 这项研究旨在检验社会支持对患有癫痫的成年人的幸福感和生活质量(QoL)的性质和结果。方法 澳大利亚癫痫纵向调查的第5波包括关于社会支持和QOLIE-31四个维度的医疗结果研究修改社会支持调查。对数值数据和开放式响应进行了定量和定性分析。使用混合方法,其中定量分析使用t检验,方差分析和块递归回归,定性分析确定主题。后果 三百三十二名癫痫患者参加了研究。定量成分表明,对于情感/信息支持,年龄较大和独自生活是关键因素。这些以及家庭收入对实际支持非常重要。对于情感支持,独居和家庭收入是因素,但只有收入是积极社会互动的因素。此外,只有积极的社会互动才能预测生活质量的提高。在研究的定性部分中,确定了情感/信息支持的积极支持和消极支持。许多人报告了掌握信息的好处,尽管一些人报告说,卫生专业人员或癫痫协会没有认真对待他们的需求。无法开车是负面有形支持的一个重要特征,发现一些辅助服务负担不起也是如此。积极的社会交往报告表明,被接受为癫痫患者是主要关注的问题。同伴支持在这方面发挥了作用。讨论 本研究中影响支持四个维度的因素的发现支持了许多研究。这包括积极的社会互动对生活质量的影响。定性分析支持这些结果,但也有助于更深入地理解PWE生活中的支持。结论 社会支持对残疾人来说是一个特别重要的问题。这项研究的结果证明了获得适当形式的支持的复杂性和好处。这项调查发生在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前,很可能这一现象影响了PWE的支持需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Epilepsy
International Journal of Epilepsy Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Antisense Molecules in Epilepsy—A Neuropharmacological Educational Review The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Acute Care Setting for Intravenous Levetiracetam (Focale) in Children Reproductive Health of Women with Epilepsy in India: An Observational Study Reassures Me There Are People Around Who Care about Me: Analyzing Meanings of Support for People with Epilepsy Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Reproductive Decision Making among Women with Epilepsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1