Diagnostic performance of point-of-care ubiquitin carboxy-terminal Hydrolase-L1 assay in distinguishing imaging abnormalities in traumatic brain injury: A TRACK-TBI cohort study

Kevin K. Wang , Jennifer C. Munoz-Pareja , Lauren A. Lautenslager , J. Adrian Tyndall , Zhihui Yang , Maria R. Kerrigan , Ramon Diaz-Arrastia , Frederick K. Korley , David Okonkwo , Ava M. Puccio , John K. Yue , Sabrina R. Taylor , Pratik Mukherjee , Esther L. Yuh , Nancy R. Temkin , Claudia S. Robertson , Xiaoying Sun , Sonia Jain , Amy J. Markowitz , Geoffrey T. Manley , Ross Zafonte
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of point-of-care ubiquitin carboxy-terminal Hydrolase-L1 assay in distinguishing imaging abnormalities in traumatic brain injury: A TRACK-TBI cohort study","authors":"Kevin K. Wang ,&nbsp;Jennifer C. Munoz-Pareja ,&nbsp;Lauren A. Lautenslager ,&nbsp;J. Adrian Tyndall ,&nbsp;Zhihui Yang ,&nbsp;Maria R. Kerrigan ,&nbsp;Ramon Diaz-Arrastia ,&nbsp;Frederick K. Korley ,&nbsp;David Okonkwo ,&nbsp;Ava M. Puccio ,&nbsp;John K. Yue ,&nbsp;Sabrina R. Taylor ,&nbsp;Pratik Mukherjee ,&nbsp;Esther L. Yuh ,&nbsp;Nancy R. Temkin ,&nbsp;Claudia S. Robertson ,&nbsp;Xiaoying Sun ,&nbsp;Sonia Jain ,&nbsp;Amy J. Markowitz ,&nbsp;Geoffrey T. Manley ,&nbsp;Ross Zafonte","doi":"10.1016/j.abst.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of UCH-L1 detection with point-of-care (POC) assay alone has not been characterized for clinical use. This study compares the accuracies of POC UCH-L1 and Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) Elecsys® levels for identifying TBI patients with structural abnormalities on neuroimaging.</p><p>The <u>T</u>ransforming <u>R</u>esearch and <u>C</u>linical <u>K</u>nowledge in <u>T</u>raumatic <u>B</u>rain <u>I</u>njury (TRACK-TBI) Phase 1 Cohort, enrolled 1375 TBI patients (GCS 3–15) presenting to one of 18 US Level I trauma centers within 24 h of injury who had an admission head CT; blood samples were collected, along with 122 orthopedic and 209 healthy controls. The TBI cohort consisted of 810 CT-negative (CT-) and 549 CT-positive (CT+) subjects. Of the CT- subjects who had MRIs, 121 were MRI-positive (MRI+) and 333 were MRI-negative (MRI-). UCH-L1 POC showed best diagnostic performance for CT + versus CT-, 0–8 h post-injury with an AUC of 0·779 [0·708–0.850] when compared to the 0–25 h interval, with an AUC of 0.684 [0.655–0.712]. NSE assay has an AUC of 0.695 [0.619–0.770] for the 0–8 h interval and 0.634 [0.603–0.665] for the 0–25 h interval. During the first 8 after injury, POC UCH-L1 outperforms NSE in identifying TBI patients with structural abnormalities on neuroimaging.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72080,"journal":{"name":"Advances in biomarker sciences and technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in biomarker sciences and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543106423000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of UCH-L1 detection with point-of-care (POC) assay alone has not been characterized for clinical use. This study compares the accuracies of POC UCH-L1 and Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) Elecsys® levels for identifying TBI patients with structural abnormalities on neuroimaging.

The Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Phase 1 Cohort, enrolled 1375 TBI patients (GCS 3–15) presenting to one of 18 US Level I trauma centers within 24 h of injury who had an admission head CT; blood samples were collected, along with 122 orthopedic and 209 healthy controls. The TBI cohort consisted of 810 CT-negative (CT-) and 549 CT-positive (CT+) subjects. Of the CT- subjects who had MRIs, 121 were MRI-positive (MRI+) and 333 were MRI-negative (MRI-). UCH-L1 POC showed best diagnostic performance for CT + versus CT-, 0–8 h post-injury with an AUC of 0·779 [0·708–0.850] when compared to the 0–25 h interval, with an AUC of 0.684 [0.655–0.712]. NSE assay has an AUC of 0.695 [0.619–0.770] for the 0–8 h interval and 0.634 [0.603–0.665] for the 0–25 h interval. During the first 8 after injury, POC UCH-L1 outperforms NSE in identifying TBI patients with structural abnormalities on neuroimaging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
即时护理泛素羧基末端水解酶- l1测定在区分外伤性脑损伤影像学异常中的诊断性能:一项TRACK-TBI队列研究
单独使用UCH-L1检测与护理点(POC)测定尚未被描述为临床使用。本研究比较了POC UCH-L1和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE) Elecsys®水平在识别神经影像学结构异常的TBI患者中的准确性。创伤性脑损伤的转化研究和临床知识(TRACK-TBI) 1期队列,纳入1375名创伤性脑损伤患者(GCS 3-15),在损伤后24小时内就诊于18个美国一级创伤中心之一,并接受入院头部CT检查;采集了122名骨科患者和209名健康对照者的血液样本。TBI队列包括810名CT阴性(CT-)和549名CT阳性(CT+)受试者。CT-患者行MRI, MRI阳性121例(MRI+), MRI阴性333例(MRI-)。UCH-L1 POC在损伤后0 - 8 h的CT +与CT-诊断中表现最佳,AUC为0.779[0.708 - 0.850],而0 - 25 h的AUC为0.684[0.655-0.712]。NSE检测在0-8 h的AUC为0.695[0.619-0.770],在0-25 h的AUC为0.634[0.603-0.665]。在损伤后的前8个月,POC UCH-L1在识别TBI患者的神经影像学结构异常方面优于NSE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in biomarker sciences and technology
Advances in biomarker sciences and technology Biotechnology, Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Faecal microbial transplant Isolation and characterization of cytotoxic and antioxidant biomarkers from the aerial parts of Suaeda aegyptica Patient-derived primary culture-based prognostic model to predict tumor recurrence in patients with glioma Faecal microbial transplant Investigation of the effects of polyherbal formulations against the combination of a high-fat cafeteria diet along with exercise modalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1