An Enhanced K-Nearest Neighbor Predictive Model through Metaheuristic Optimization

IF 1.3 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation Pub Date : 2020-09-29 DOI:10.46604/ijeti.2020.4646
Allemar Jhone P. Delima
{"title":"An Enhanced K-Nearest Neighbor Predictive Model through Metaheuristic Optimization","authors":"Allemar Jhone P. Delima","doi":"10.46604/ijeti.2020.4646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The k-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm is vulnerable to noise, which is rooted in the dataset and has negative effects on its accuracy. Hence, various researchers employ variable minimization techniques before predicting the KNN in the quest so as to improve its predictive capability. \nThe genetic algorithm (GA) is the most widely used metaheuristics for such purpose; however, the GA suffers a problem that its mating scheme is bounded on its crossover operator. Thus, the use of the novel inversed bi-segmented average crossover (IBAX) is observed. In the present work, the crossover improved genetic algorithm (CIGAL) is instrumental in the enhancement of KNN’s prediction accuracy. The use of the unmodified genetic algorithm has removed 13 variables, while the CIGAL then further removes 20 variables from the 30 total variables in the faculty evaluation dataset. \nConsequently, the integration of the CIGAL to the KNN (CIGAL-KNN) prediction model improves the KNN prediction accuracy to 95.53%. In contrast to the model of having the unmodified genetic algorithm (GA-KNN), the use of the lone KNN algorithmand the prediction accuracy is only at 89.94% and 87.15%, respectively. To validate the accuracy of the models, the use of the 10-folds cross-validation technique reveals 93.13%, 89.27%, and 87.77% prediction accuracy of the CIGAL-KNN, GA-KNN, and KNN prediction models, respectively. As the result, the CIGAL carried out an optimized GA performance and increased the accuracy of the KNN algorithm as a prediction model.","PeriodicalId":43808,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46604/ijeti.2020.4646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The k-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm is vulnerable to noise, which is rooted in the dataset and has negative effects on its accuracy. Hence, various researchers employ variable minimization techniques before predicting the KNN in the quest so as to improve its predictive capability. The genetic algorithm (GA) is the most widely used metaheuristics for such purpose; however, the GA suffers a problem that its mating scheme is bounded on its crossover operator. Thus, the use of the novel inversed bi-segmented average crossover (IBAX) is observed. In the present work, the crossover improved genetic algorithm (CIGAL) is instrumental in the enhancement of KNN’s prediction accuracy. The use of the unmodified genetic algorithm has removed 13 variables, while the CIGAL then further removes 20 variables from the 30 total variables in the faculty evaluation dataset. Consequently, the integration of the CIGAL to the KNN (CIGAL-KNN) prediction model improves the KNN prediction accuracy to 95.53%. In contrast to the model of having the unmodified genetic algorithm (GA-KNN), the use of the lone KNN algorithmand the prediction accuracy is only at 89.94% and 87.15%, respectively. To validate the accuracy of the models, the use of the 10-folds cross-validation technique reveals 93.13%, 89.27%, and 87.77% prediction accuracy of the CIGAL-KNN, GA-KNN, and KNN prediction models, respectively. As the result, the CIGAL carried out an optimized GA performance and increased the accuracy of the KNN algorithm as a prediction model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于元启发式优化的改进K近邻预测模型
KNN算法容易受到噪声的影响,噪声根植于数据集中,对其精度有负面影响。因此,为了提高KNN的预测能力,研究者们在预测KNN之前采用了变量最小化技术。遗传算法(GA)是在这方面应用最广泛的元启发式算法;然而,遗传算法的匹配方案存在交叉算子有界的问题。因此,使用新的反双分段平均交叉(IBAX)被观察到。在本研究中,交叉改进遗传算法(CIGAL)有助于提高KNN的预测精度。使用未修改的遗传算法删除了13个变量,而CIGAL随后从教师评估数据集中的30个总变量中进一步删除了20个变量。因此,CIGAL与KNN (CIGAL-KNN)预测模型的集成将KNN预测精度提高到95.53%。与使用未修改遗传算法(GA-KNN)的模型相比,使用单一KNN算法和预测准确率分别仅为89.94%和87.15%。为了验证模型的准确性,使用10倍交叉验证技术,CIGAL-KNN、GA-KNN和KNN预测模型的预测准确率分别为93.13%、89.27%和87.77%。结果表明,CIGAL优化了遗传算法的性能,提高了KNN算法作为预测模型的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJETI journal focus on the field of engineering and technology Innovation. And it publishes original papers including but not limited to the following fields: Automation Engineering Civil Engineering Control Engineering Electric Engineering Electronic Engineering Green Technology Information Engineering Mechanical Engineering Material Engineering Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering Nanotechnology Optic Engineering Sport Science and Technology Innovation Management Other Engineering and Technology Related Topics.
期刊最新文献
Domain Adaptation for Roasted Coffee Bean Quality Inspection Design of Deep Learning Acoustic Sonar Receiver with Temporal/ Spatial Underwater Channel Feature Extraction Capability Grid Operation and Inspection Resource Scheduling Based on an Adaptive Genetic Algorithm Closed-House Biofilter Design and Performance Evaluation for Mitigating Environmental Odor Disturbances Analysis of Drain-Induced Barrier Lowering for Gate-All-Around FET with Ferroelectric
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1