How Does the Language Control of L1 and L2 Writers Develop Over Time in First-Year Composition?

IF 1.9 1区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Written Communication Pub Date : 2022-07-11 DOI:10.1177/07410883221099474
G. Eckstein, Ruei-Han Chang
{"title":"How Does the Language Control of L1 and L2 Writers Develop Over Time in First-Year Composition?","authors":"G. Eckstein, Ruei-Han Chang","doi":"10.1177/07410883221099474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most U.S. colleges and universities expect students to improve their writing ability by taking first-year composition (FYC) courses. In such courses, non-native English (L2) writers with diverse language backgrounds study alongside their native English (L1) speaking peers. However, it is not clear how different these populations are in terms of their language development over time, leaving questions unanswered about whether L2 writers develop more or less than L1 writers in an FYC curriculum. To investigate, we compared 75 L1 and L2 students’ written accuracy, fluency, and lexical and syntactic complexity over the semester of an FYC course. Data showed that L2 students had significantly higher rates of language error and less fluent and lexically complex writing compared to L1 writers. Moreover, L2 student writing became less grammatically accurate over 14 weeks despite showing greater fluency and syntactic complexity. These results suggest a need for plurilingual pedagogies in FYC that embrace diversity and inclusion while also providing L2 writers with instruction on socially powerful and dominant linguistic forms.","PeriodicalId":47351,"journal":{"name":"Written Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Written Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221099474","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most U.S. colleges and universities expect students to improve their writing ability by taking first-year composition (FYC) courses. In such courses, non-native English (L2) writers with diverse language backgrounds study alongside their native English (L1) speaking peers. However, it is not clear how different these populations are in terms of their language development over time, leaving questions unanswered about whether L2 writers develop more or less than L1 writers in an FYC curriculum. To investigate, we compared 75 L1 and L2 students’ written accuracy, fluency, and lexical and syntactic complexity over the semester of an FYC course. Data showed that L2 students had significantly higher rates of language error and less fluent and lexically complex writing compared to L1 writers. Moreover, L2 student writing became less grammatically accurate over 14 weeks despite showing greater fluency and syntactic complexity. These results suggest a need for plurilingual pedagogies in FYC that embrace diversity and inclusion while also providing L2 writers with instruction on socially powerful and dominant linguistic forms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在第一年的写作中,母语和第二语言作者的语言控制是如何随着时间的推移而发展的?
大多数美国学院和大学都希望学生通过第一年的写作课程来提高他们的写作能力。在这些课程中,具有不同语言背景的非母语英语(L2)作家与母语英语(L1)的同龄人一起学习。然而,随着时间的推移,这些人群在语言发展方面的差异有多大尚不清楚,这就留下了一个悬而未决的问题,即在FYC课程中,第二语言写作者的发展是比第一语言写作者的发展多还是少。为了进行研究,我们比较了75名L1和L2学生在FYC课程学期中的书面准确性、流畅性、词汇和句法复杂性。数据显示,与母语作者相比,第二语言学生的语言错误率明显更高,写作不流畅,词汇不复杂。此外,在14周的时间里,第二语言学生的写作在语法准确性上有所下降,尽管他们表现出了更大的流畅性和句法复杂性。这些结果表明,FYC需要多语教学法,既要包容多样性和包容性,又要向第二语言作者提供具有社会影响力和主导地位的语言形式的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Written Communication
Written Communication COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Written Communication is an international multidisciplinary journal that publishes theory and research in writing from fields including anthropology, English, education, history, journalism, linguistics, psychology, and rhetoric. Among topics of interest are the nature of writing ability; the assessment of writing; the impact of technology on writing (and the impact of writing on technology); the social and political consequences of writing and writing instruction; nonacademic writing; literacy (including workplace and emergent literacy and the effects of classroom processes on literacy development); the social construction of knowledge; the nature of writing in disciplinary and professional domains.
期刊最新文献
What Is a Workplace? Principles for Bounding Case Studies of Genres, Processes, Objects, and Organizations Writing Storybooks as Storytelling: A Case Study of Two Families with Refugee Backgrounds Writing Quality Predictive Modeling: Integrating Register-Related Factors Charting RAD Research as an Orientation to Creativity in Writing Studies The Topoi of Small Business Entrepreneurship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1