Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and fournier gangrene severity index are not prognostic factors of mortality in fournier gangrene patients

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Universa Medicina Pub Date : 2022-04-09 DOI:10.18051/univmed.2022.v41.71-78
Muhammad Achdiar Raizandha, F. Hidayatullah, Y. Kloping, F. Rizaldi
{"title":"Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and fournier gangrene severity index are not prognostic factors of mortality in fournier gangrene patients","authors":"Muhammad Achdiar Raizandha, F. Hidayatullah, Y. Kloping, F. Rizaldi","doi":"10.18051/univmed.2022.v41.71-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Fournier gangrene (FG) is a life-threatening disease, commonly found in diabetic and immunocompromised patients. Recent studies suggested the use of new parameters apart from the commonly used Fournier gangrene severity index (FGSI), such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the clinical use of which remains questionable. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the role of the NLR and FGSI as a prognostic factor of mortality in patients with FG.\nMethodsThis is an analytical study with a retrospective approach involving 109 adult patients diagnosed with FG. Data were collected regarding medical history, symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory tests. The FGSI score and NLR were determined. Bivariate analysis was performed using chi-square test and independent t-test. Overall survival between groups was compared using Kaplan–Meier survival estimates and Cox regression test.\nResultsOf the 109 patients, 90 survived (82.5%, group 1) and 19 died (17.43%, group 2). The cut-off point of NLR among the patients was 10.9, with a 73.7% sensitivity and 60% specificity. The area under curve value was 0.65 (95% CI; 0.524-0.754; p<0.05). The Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed that NLR was as an independent prognostic factor of mortality in FG patients (HR 5.177; 95% CI; 1.092-8.471; p<0.05), but Cox regression analysis showed that NLR and FGSI were not significant prognostic factors of mortality (p=0.09 and p=0.179; respectively).\nConclusionThis study demonstrated that NLR and FGSI are not important as prognostic tools for FG mortality.","PeriodicalId":42578,"journal":{"name":"Universa Medicina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universa Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18051/univmed.2022.v41.71-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Fournier gangrene (FG) is a life-threatening disease, commonly found in diabetic and immunocompromised patients. Recent studies suggested the use of new parameters apart from the commonly used Fournier gangrene severity index (FGSI), such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the clinical use of which remains questionable. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the role of the NLR and FGSI as a prognostic factor of mortality in patients with FG. MethodsThis is an analytical study with a retrospective approach involving 109 adult patients diagnosed with FG. Data were collected regarding medical history, symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory tests. The FGSI score and NLR were determined. Bivariate analysis was performed using chi-square test and independent t-test. Overall survival between groups was compared using Kaplan–Meier survival estimates and Cox regression test. ResultsOf the 109 patients, 90 survived (82.5%, group 1) and 19 died (17.43%, group 2). The cut-off point of NLR among the patients was 10.9, with a 73.7% sensitivity and 60% specificity. The area under curve value was 0.65 (95% CI; 0.524-0.754; p<0.05). The Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed that NLR was as an independent prognostic factor of mortality in FG patients (HR 5.177; 95% CI; 1.092-8.471; p<0.05), but Cox regression analysis showed that NLR and FGSI were not significant prognostic factors of mortality (p=0.09 and p=0.179; respectively). ConclusionThis study demonstrated that NLR and FGSI are not important as prognostic tools for FG mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率和富尼尔坏疽严重程度指数不是富尼尔坏疽患者死亡率的预后因素
福尼尔坏疽(FG)是一种危及生命的疾病,常见于糖尿病和免疫功能低下的患者。最近的研究表明,除了常用的福尼尔坏疽严重程度指数(FGSI)外,还使用了新的参数,如中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR),其临床应用仍有疑问。因此,我们旨在评估NLR和FGSI作为FGS患者死亡率的预后因素的作用。方法这是一项回顾性分析研究,涉及109名诊断为FGS的成年患者。收集了有关病史、症状、体检结果和实验室检查的数据。测定FGSI评分和NLR。采用卡方检验和独立t检验进行双变量分析。使用Kaplan–Meier生存估计和Cox回归检验比较各组之间的总生存率。结果109例患者中,存活90例(82.5%,第1组),死亡19例(17.43%,第2组)。NLR在患者中的截止点为10.9,敏感性为73.7%,特异性为60%。曲线下面积值为0.65(95%CI;0.524-0.754;p<0.05)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,NLR是FG患者死亡率的独立预后因素(HR 5.177;95%CI;1.092-8.471;p<0.05),Cox回归分析表明,NLR和FGSI不是影响FG死亡率的重要预后因素(分别为p=0.09和0.179)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Universa Medicina
Universa Medicina MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Secretome hypoxia-mesenchymal stem cells decrease tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-18 in kidney of type 2 diabetes mellitus model rats Protective role of melatonin in ultraviolet radiation- induced oxidative stress in human skin photoaging Correlation of angle kappa with biometry and higher-order aberrations of cataract patients at Prof. Ngoerah Hospital Ophthalmology Clinic Release of retromalleolar flexor retinaculum and combined flexor digitorum longus and flexor hallucis longus Z-plasty in checkrein deformity: a case report Profile of multidrug-resistant bacteria causing urinary tract infections in inpatients and outpatients in Jakarta and Tangerang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1