Securing a conducive environment for WASH markets: the role of local government

Q4 Environmental Science Waterlines Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.3362/1756-3488.18-00026
A. Gero, J. Willetts
{"title":"Securing a conducive environment for WASH markets: the role of local government","authors":"A. Gero, J. Willetts","doi":"10.3362/1756-3488.18-00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Local governments play critical, yet under-recognized, roles in supporting or constraining the development of emerging water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) markets. The focus of market approaches to date has been primarily on small-scale businesses and social enterprises themselves, rather than on addressing the broader institutional environment.\nThis study, drawing on experiences in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Indonesia, examined the political economy affecting support to WASH market actors, including the perspective and role of local governments. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural water supply enterprises and sanitation entrepreneurs, non-governmental organizations, and government officials. Qualitative analysis yielded key themes as regards political economy dynamics and identification of a breadth of pertinent roles for local governments. This study formed part of a larger research initiative funded through the Australian aid programme, focused on small-scale enterprise and led by the University of Technology Sydney.\nThe findings demonstrate important local government roles, including: training and business development support to enterprises; linking demand and supply by promoting local enterprises; supporting associations of entrepreneurs; providing targeted subsidies or financing to catalyse private sector engagement or to facilitate access for the poor and disadvantaged; and setting and monitoring quality standards and accreditation of products and services. In particular, balancing an enabling or supporting role with the need to ensure appropriate regulatory functions are in place provided a point of tension (and sometimes confusion) for local governments. Key motivators driving local government engagement with enterprises included coverage targets. Various constraints limited their support, including lack of clarity on their role, availability of relevant skills, and perceptions that WASH market systems and private sector engagement should arise spontaneously.\nThese findings inform gaps in development agency programming when it comes to WASH markets in terms of the need to work more strategically with local government actors, rather than solely directing efforts towards enterprises themselves. This study suggests a way forward in progressing more systemic interventions to support WASH markets in ways that facilitate local governments and related stakeholders to play more effective roles and achieve greater and more equitable development outcomes.","PeriodicalId":39265,"journal":{"name":"Waterlines","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waterlines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.18-00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Local governments play critical, yet under-recognized, roles in supporting or constraining the development of emerging water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) markets. The focus of market approaches to date has been primarily on small-scale businesses and social enterprises themselves, rather than on addressing the broader institutional environment. This study, drawing on experiences in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Indonesia, examined the political economy affecting support to WASH market actors, including the perspective and role of local governments. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural water supply enterprises and sanitation entrepreneurs, non-governmental organizations, and government officials. Qualitative analysis yielded key themes as regards political economy dynamics and identification of a breadth of pertinent roles for local governments. This study formed part of a larger research initiative funded through the Australian aid programme, focused on small-scale enterprise and led by the University of Technology Sydney. The findings demonstrate important local government roles, including: training and business development support to enterprises; linking demand and supply by promoting local enterprises; supporting associations of entrepreneurs; providing targeted subsidies or financing to catalyse private sector engagement or to facilitate access for the poor and disadvantaged; and setting and monitoring quality standards and accreditation of products and services. In particular, balancing an enabling or supporting role with the need to ensure appropriate regulatory functions are in place provided a point of tension (and sometimes confusion) for local governments. Key motivators driving local government engagement with enterprises included coverage targets. Various constraints limited their support, including lack of clarity on their role, availability of relevant skills, and perceptions that WASH market systems and private sector engagement should arise spontaneously. These findings inform gaps in development agency programming when it comes to WASH markets in terms of the need to work more strategically with local government actors, rather than solely directing efforts towards enterprises themselves. This study suggests a way forward in progressing more systemic interventions to support WASH markets in ways that facilitate local governments and related stakeholders to play more effective roles and achieve greater and more equitable development outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为讲卫生市场创造有利环境:地方政府的作用
地方政府在支持或限制新兴的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)市场的发展方面发挥着关键但未得到充分认可的作用。迄今为止,市场方法的重点主要是小规模企业和社会企业本身,而不是处理更广泛的体制环境。这项研究借鉴了越南、柬埔寨和印度尼西亚的经验,考察了影响对讲卫生运动市场参与者支持的政治经济,包括地方政府的观点和作用。对农村供水企业和环卫企业家、非政府组织和政府官员进行了半结构化访谈。定性分析产生了关于政治经济动态和确定地方政府广泛相关角色的关键主题。这项研究是由澳大利亚援助计划资助的一项更大的研究计划的一部分,该计划以小规模企业为重点,由悉尼科技大学领导。调查结果表明,地方政府发挥着重要作用,包括:为企业提供培训和业务发展支持;通过促进当地企业,将需求和供应联系起来;支持企业家协会;提供有针对性的补贴或融资,以促进私营部门的参与或为穷人和弱势群体提供便利;制定和监测产品和服务的质量标准和认证。特别是,平衡扶持或支持作用与确保适当监管职能到位的需要,为地方政府提供了一个紧张点(有时甚至是混乱点)。推动地方政府与企业合作的主要动力包括覆盖率目标。各种制约因素限制了他们的支持,包括他们的角色不明确,相关技能不可用,以及认为讲卫生市场体系和私营部门的参与应该自发产生的看法。这些发现表明,在讲卫生市场方面,发展机构的规划存在差距,需要与地方政府行为者进行更具战略性的合作,而不仅仅是将努力导向企业本身。这项研究提出了一条前进的道路,即推进更系统的干预措施,以支持讲卫生市场,促进地方政府和相关利益攸关方发挥更有效的作用,实现更大、更公平的发展成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Waterlines
Waterlines Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Published since 1982 Waterlines is a refereed journal providing a forum for those involved in extending water supply, sanitation, hygiene and waste management to all in developing countries. Waterlines aims to bridge the gap between research and practice: it encourages papers written by researchers for the benefit of practice and those written by practitioners to inform research and policy. It highlights information sources and promotes debate between different perspectives. Waterlines considers the key challenges facing those in the water and sanitation sector–engineers, health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Waterlines – the final editorial Can a citizen-science approach to collecting data assist the management of intermittent water supply in low-income and data-scarce settings? Child-centred methods for school-based WASH interventions: co-creating sanitation research and interventions for and with children Assessing climate impacts on gender and socially inclusive WASH: lessons from a research-practice project Educating sanitation professionals: moving from STEM to specialist training in higher education in Malawi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1