Mismedication as COVID-19 pandemic response of rural folks: Implications for national COVID-19 response policy of Lesotho.

Q3 Medicine Journal of Emergency Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5055/jem.0725
Christopher Dick-Sagoe, Peter Asare-Nuamah, Mokaloba Mokaloba
{"title":"Mismedication as COVID-19 pandemic response of rural folks: Implications for national COVID-19 response policy of Lesotho.","authors":"Christopher Dick-Sagoe,&nbsp;Peter Asare-Nuamah,&nbsp;Mokaloba Mokaloba","doi":"10.5055/jem.0725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19's super-spread nature, its adverse impacts, and the associated public fear and panic have resulted in the use of \"dangerous\" substances and medicinal herbs (mismedication), particularly in rural parts of Africa. Exploring the phenomenon of mismedication is crucial for promoting effective public health policies. This study adopted a qualitative study design and purposively selected and interviewed 50 rural folks cutting across the 10 districts of Lesotho in Southern Africa. The study's findings show that rural folks perceive a high vulnerability to the COVID-19 virus. They also consider COVID-19 a dangerous virus and have high fear arousal of contracting the virus. It was realized that rural folks resort to unreliable sources of information on COVID-19 pandemic, such as friends and family members, social media, village members, and grandchildren. These untrustworthy sources spread a lot of misinformation about COVID-19, causing fear and panic among rural residents. To remedy the spread of the pandemic, its impact, and the underlying public fear and panic, rural dwellers have resorted to the use of unapproved medicinal plants. Trust in unapproved medicinal plants influences rural dwellers' compliance to the standard protocols implemented to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. The study recommends the urgent need to intensify scientific investigation into the various medicinal plants for their efficacy, side effects, preparation, and approved dosage. Again, effective public education on the efficacy and dangers associated with the use of unapproved medications must be strengthened, particularly in rural communities through the active participation of opinion, traditional, and religious leaders.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":" ","pages":"83-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19's super-spread nature, its adverse impacts, and the associated public fear and panic have resulted in the use of "dangerous" substances and medicinal herbs (mismedication), particularly in rural parts of Africa. Exploring the phenomenon of mismedication is crucial for promoting effective public health policies. This study adopted a qualitative study design and purposively selected and interviewed 50 rural folks cutting across the 10 districts of Lesotho in Southern Africa. The study's findings show that rural folks perceive a high vulnerability to the COVID-19 virus. They also consider COVID-19 a dangerous virus and have high fear arousal of contracting the virus. It was realized that rural folks resort to unreliable sources of information on COVID-19 pandemic, such as friends and family members, social media, village members, and grandchildren. These untrustworthy sources spread a lot of misinformation about COVID-19, causing fear and panic among rural residents. To remedy the spread of the pandemic, its impact, and the underlying public fear and panic, rural dwellers have resorted to the use of unapproved medicinal plants. Trust in unapproved medicinal plants influences rural dwellers' compliance to the standard protocols implemented to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. The study recommends the urgent need to intensify scientific investigation into the various medicinal plants for their efficacy, side effects, preparation, and approved dosage. Again, effective public education on the efficacy and dangers associated with the use of unapproved medications must be strengthened, particularly in rural communities through the active participation of opinion, traditional, and religious leaders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
误药作为农村居民COVID-19大流行应对措施:对莱索托国家COVID-19应对政策的影响
新冠肺炎的超级传播性质、其不良影响以及相关的公众恐惧和恐慌导致了“危险”物质和草药的使用(用药不当),尤其是在非洲农村地区。探索用药不当现象对于促进有效的公共卫生政策至关重要。本研究采用了定性研究设计,有针对性地选择并采访了莱索托南部非洲10个地区的50名农村居民。研究结果表明,农村人对新冠肺炎病毒的易感性很高。他们还认为新冠肺炎是一种危险的病毒,对感染病毒有高度的恐惧。人们意识到,农村人求助于关于新冠肺炎大流行的不可靠信息来源,如朋友和家人、社交媒体、村成员和孙子女。这些不可信任的消息来源传播了大量关于新冠肺炎的错误信息,引起了农村居民的恐惧和恐慌。为了弥补疫情的传播、影响以及潜在的公众恐惧和恐慌,农村居民不得不使用未经批准的药用植物。对未经批准的药用植物的信任会影响农村居民遵守为缓解新冠肺炎大流行而实施的标准协议。该研究建议,迫切需要加强对各种药用植物的功效、副作用、制剂和批准剂量的科学调查。同样,必须加强关于使用未经批准的药物的疗效和危险性的有效公共教育,特别是在农村社区,通过舆论、传统和宗教领袖的积极参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
United front: Emergency management managers, public health, and infection prevention. What's next for the disaster profession? A study of the opinions of local and state emergency managers and their recommendations for a more resilient future. A case study of university mass casualty simulation with high school deaf students who sign. A qualitative analysis of the effects of the COVID-19 response on low-income residents in Cameron County, Texas: Lessons for future pandemic response. Beirut 2020 explosion and health system response: An alarm for the dangerous consequences of Natech incidents in industrial cities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1