A novel approach for calculating the item discrimination for Likert type of scales

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education Pub Date : 2022-09-10 DOI:10.21449/ijate.1173356
Ümit Çelen, E. C. Aybek
{"title":"A novel approach for calculating the item discrimination for Likert type of scales","authors":"Ümit Çelen, E. C. Aybek","doi":"10.21449/ijate.1173356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Item analysis is performed by developers as an integral part of the scale development process. Thus, items are excluded from the scale depending on the item analysis prior to the factor analysis. Existing item discrimination indices are calculated based on correlation, yet items with different response patterns are likely to have a similar item discrimination index. This study proposed a new item discrimination index that can be used in Likert type of scales and examined its effect on factor analysis results. For this purpose, simulative datasets were generated, and items were excluded from the analysis according to the .20, .30 and .35 item discrimination index criteria, and exploratory factor analysis was performed for a single factor. Accordingly, it was found that more variance could be explained by a single factor with fewer items compared to other discrimination indices when the .20 criterion of the slope coefficient was used as suggested in this study. Similar findings were obtained using the .35 criterion with other discrimination indices. In this context, it is recommended to use the slope coefficient as an additional discrimination index calculation method in the scale development process.","PeriodicalId":42417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1173356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Item analysis is performed by developers as an integral part of the scale development process. Thus, items are excluded from the scale depending on the item analysis prior to the factor analysis. Existing item discrimination indices are calculated based on correlation, yet items with different response patterns are likely to have a similar item discrimination index. This study proposed a new item discrimination index that can be used in Likert type of scales and examined its effect on factor analysis results. For this purpose, simulative datasets were generated, and items were excluded from the analysis according to the .20, .30 and .35 item discrimination index criteria, and exploratory factor analysis was performed for a single factor. Accordingly, it was found that more variance could be explained by a single factor with fewer items compared to other discrimination indices when the .20 criterion of the slope coefficient was used as suggested in this study. Similar findings were obtained using the .35 criterion with other discrimination indices. In this context, it is recommended to use the slope coefficient as an additional discrimination index calculation method in the scale development process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种计算Likert型量表项目判别的新方法
项目分析由开发人员执行,作为规模开发过程的一个组成部分。因此,根据因素分析之前的项目分析,项目被排除在量表之外。现有的项目歧视指数是基于相关性计算的,但具有不同反应模式的项目可能具有相似的项目歧视指标。本研究提出了一种新的可用于Likert型量表的项目判别指数,并考察了其对因子分析结果的影响。为此,生成了模拟数据集,并根据.20、.30和.35项目判别指数标准将项目排除在分析之外,并对单个因素进行探索性因素分析。因此,研究发现,当如本研究中所建议的那样使用斜率系数的.20标准时,与其他判别指数相比,一个项目较少的单一因素可以解释更多的方差。使用.35标准和其他判别指数也得到了类似的结果。在这种情况下,建议在规模发展过程中使用斜率系数作为额外的判别指数计算方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The complexity of the grading system in Turkish higher education Global competence scale: An adaptation to measure pre-service English teachers’ global competences Language Models in Automated Essay Scoring: Insights for the Turkish Language Type I error and power rates: A comparative analysis of techniques in differential item functioning A data pipeline for e-large-scale assessments: Better automation, quality assurance, and efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1