“The Juices of the Body”: Ecomasculine Fluidification in Two Stories by Isak Dinesen

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Men and Masculinities Pub Date : 2021-06-29 DOI:10.1177/1097184X211025578
Peter Mortensen
{"title":"“The Juices of the Body”: Ecomasculine Fluidification in Two Stories by Isak Dinesen","authors":"Peter Mortensen","doi":"10.1177/1097184X211025578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender is a key factor in shaping perceptions of environmental relationships, and moving toward sustainability requires that we rethink dominant ideas about both femininity and masculinity. Danish bilingual author Karen Blixen (1885–1962) wrote cryptic and convoluted stories under the male pseudonym Isak Dinesen, and while there is an abundance of feminist scholarship on Dinesen, her critique of masculine identity and her relevance to the emergent field of ecomasculinity studies have so far gone unnoticed. In this essay, I draw on feminist scholarship and cultural histories of male embodiment, as I analyze fluid masculine corporeality in “The Monkey” (1934) and “Ehrengard” (1962). In both her early and late narratives, I argue, Dinesen pushes back against the 20th century “metallization” of male bodies with baroque narratives and characters whose trajectories begin to produce novel and fruitful understandings of masculinity and the male body in relation to other bodies and the more-than-human world. More specifically, what I label “fluidification” designates recurring moments in Dinesen’s writing when corporeal boundaries are breached and male characters find themselves re-manned and re-environed by their bodies’ all-too-human participation in “transcorporeal” flows. The male bodies that populate Dinesen’s fiction, I find, diverge strikingly from the seamlessly solid, statuesque, and self-enclosed men of steel fantasized by contemporary fascists, communists, futurists, militarists, and machine-age modernists. While the hegemonic ideal of hard, dry, anti-ecological masculinity has persisted and even flourished to the present day, I approach Dinesen’s fictions as counterhegemonic sites where alternative earth-friendlier meanings of masculinity can become visible.","PeriodicalId":47750,"journal":{"name":"Men and Masculinities","volume":"25 1","pages":"106 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1097184X211025578","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Men and Masculinities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X211025578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Gender is a key factor in shaping perceptions of environmental relationships, and moving toward sustainability requires that we rethink dominant ideas about both femininity and masculinity. Danish bilingual author Karen Blixen (1885–1962) wrote cryptic and convoluted stories under the male pseudonym Isak Dinesen, and while there is an abundance of feminist scholarship on Dinesen, her critique of masculine identity and her relevance to the emergent field of ecomasculinity studies have so far gone unnoticed. In this essay, I draw on feminist scholarship and cultural histories of male embodiment, as I analyze fluid masculine corporeality in “The Monkey” (1934) and “Ehrengard” (1962). In both her early and late narratives, I argue, Dinesen pushes back against the 20th century “metallization” of male bodies with baroque narratives and characters whose trajectories begin to produce novel and fruitful understandings of masculinity and the male body in relation to other bodies and the more-than-human world. More specifically, what I label “fluidification” designates recurring moments in Dinesen’s writing when corporeal boundaries are breached and male characters find themselves re-manned and re-environed by their bodies’ all-too-human participation in “transcorporeal” flows. The male bodies that populate Dinesen’s fiction, I find, diverge strikingly from the seamlessly solid, statuesque, and self-enclosed men of steel fantasized by contemporary fascists, communists, futurists, militarists, and machine-age modernists. While the hegemonic ideal of hard, dry, anti-ecological masculinity has persisted and even flourished to the present day, I approach Dinesen’s fictions as counterhegemonic sites where alternative earth-friendlier meanings of masculinity can become visible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“身体的汁液”:两个故事中的ecomculine流化,作者:Isak Dinesen
性别是形成对环境关系看法的关键因素,迈向可持续发展要求我们重新思考关于女性气质和男性气质的主流观念。丹麦双语作家凯伦·布利森(Karen Blixen, 1885-1962)以男性笔名伊萨克·迪内森(Isak Dinesen)写了一些神秘而令人费解的故事。尽管有大量关于迪内森的女权主义学术研究,但她对男性身份的批评以及她与新兴的男性气质研究领域的关联,迄今为止一直没有引起人们的注意。在这篇文章中,我在分析《猴子》(The Monkey, 1934)和《埃伦加德》(Ehrengard, 1962)中流动的男性肉体时,借鉴了女权主义学术和男性化身的文化历史。我认为,在她早期和晚期的叙事中,迪内森用巴洛克式的叙事和人物的轨迹,抵制了20世纪男性身体的“金属化”,这些叙事和人物的轨迹开始产生对男性气质和男性身体与其他身体以及超越人类的世界之间关系的新颖而富有成效的理解。更具体地说,我所说的“流化”指的是迪内森作品中反复出现的时刻,当肉体界限被打破,男性角色发现自己被他们的身体重新操纵和重新包围,因为他们的身体太过人类地参与了“超肉体”流动。我发现,迪内森小说中充斥的男性身体,与当代法西斯主义者、共产主义者、未来主义者、军国主义者和机器时代的现代主义者所幻想的无缝的、雕像般的、自我封闭的钢铁男人截然不同。虽然硬的、干枯的、反生态的男性气概的霸权理想一直持续到今天,甚至蓬勃发展,但我把迪内森的小说作为反霸权的场所,在那里,男性气概的另一种对地球友好的意义可以变得可见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Men and Masculinities presents peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical scholarship grounded in the most current theoretical perspectives within gender studies, including feminism, queer theory and multiculturalism. Using diverse methodologies, Men and Masculinities"s articles explore the evolving roles and perceptions of men across society. Complementing existing publications on women"s studies and gay and lesbian studies, Men and Masculinities helps complete the spectrum of research on gender. The journal gives scholars interested in gender vital, balanced information on the burgeoning - and often misunderstood - field of masculinities studies.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: What About Men? A Feminist Answers the Question Respectable: Politics and Paradox in Making the Morehouse Man Remaking the Myth of the ‘Trade Warrior’: Searching for South Korean Masculinity in the Philippines Governing Bodies Through Water: Turning Boys Into Men and Reducing Bodies to Biology Men and Masculinities Scholarship and Interventions in Latin America: Symposium Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1