The Search for Social Harmony at Harvard Business School, 1919–1942

IF 1 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Modern Intellectual History Pub Date : 2022-01-24 DOI:10.1017/S1479244321000706
Ryan M. Acton
{"title":"The Search for Social Harmony at Harvard Business School, 1919–1942","authors":"Ryan M. Acton","doi":"10.1017/S1479244321000706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the mid-1920s, Wallace Donham, the dean of Harvard Business School, recruited two intellectuals, Elton Mayo and Lawrence Henderson, to find solutions to the nation's ills. Like many intellectuals since the late 1800s, Donham, Mayo, and Henderson believed that laissez-faire modernization and competitive individualism had shattered the social bonds that had once harmonized the nation. Corporations, they believed, thus should use a new science of administration to tie workers into close-knit workgroups. These bonds would fulfill workers’ needs for stability and community, discipline workers’ wayward emotions and thoughts, and diminish workers’ susceptibility to labor activism and radical politics. Historians have shown that a vein of intellectuals turned the common “progressive” faith in social bonds into an argument for the strong state. This article shows, however, that this faith also contributed to conservative thought and tools of control.","PeriodicalId":44584,"journal":{"name":"Modern Intellectual History","volume":"20 1","pages":"141 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Intellectual History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244321000706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In the mid-1920s, Wallace Donham, the dean of Harvard Business School, recruited two intellectuals, Elton Mayo and Lawrence Henderson, to find solutions to the nation's ills. Like many intellectuals since the late 1800s, Donham, Mayo, and Henderson believed that laissez-faire modernization and competitive individualism had shattered the social bonds that had once harmonized the nation. Corporations, they believed, thus should use a new science of administration to tie workers into close-knit workgroups. These bonds would fulfill workers’ needs for stability and community, discipline workers’ wayward emotions and thoughts, and diminish workers’ susceptibility to labor activism and radical politics. Historians have shown that a vein of intellectuals turned the common “progressive” faith in social bonds into an argument for the strong state. This article shows, however, that this faith also contributed to conservative thought and tools of control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1919-1942年,哈佛商学院对社会和谐的追求
20世纪20年代中期,哈佛商学院院长华莱士·多纳姆(Wallace Donham)聘请了埃尔顿·梅奥(Elton Mayo)和劳伦斯·亨德森(Lawrence Henderson)两位知识分子,为美国的弊病寻找解决方案。像19世纪末以来的许多知识分子一样,多纳姆、梅奥和亨德森认为,自由放任的现代化和竞争性的个人主义破坏了曾经和谐国家的社会纽带。因此,他们认为,公司应该使用一种新的管理科学,将工人们紧密地联系在一起。这些纽带将满足工人对稳定和社区的需求,约束工人任性的情绪和思想,并减少工人对劳工激进主义和激进政治的敏感性。历史学家已经证明,一批知识分子把对社会纽带的普遍“进步”信念变成了支持强大国家的论据。然而,这篇文章表明,这种信仰也有助于保守思想和控制工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Structuralist or Lesbian? Claude Lévi-Strauss and Monique Wittig on Rousseau's “Science” From the Hebrew Commonwealth to Party Politics: Rousseau's Legacy and the Nation-State in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought From the Body of the King to the Body of the Nation: Sovereignty, Sodomy, and the English Revolution of 1688 Legal Counterrevolution: Property and Judicial Power in the Weimar Republic Isaac Breuer's Antiliberal Neo-Kantianism and the Politicization of Jewish Ultra-Orthodoxy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1