Lordosis Posture (Arching the Back) Indicates Sexual Receptivity in Women

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology Pub Date : 2023-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s40750-023-00212-3
Farid Pazhoohi, Ray Garza, Alan Kingstone
{"title":"Lordosis Posture (Arching the Back) Indicates Sexual Receptivity in Women","authors":"Farid Pazhoohi,&nbsp;Ray Garza,&nbsp;Alan Kingstone","doi":"10.1007/s40750-023-00212-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Human females may attract men and solicit their approach through different nonverbal displays and signals. In many non-human animals, a lordosis posture in a female is a reliable signal of sexual receptivity. Recently, it has been argued that this posture is linked to a similar signal between men and women. The current research across three investigations aimed to test the predictions arising from the sexual receptivity hypothesis of lordosis posture.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using realistic 3D generated stimuli, both men and women viewed women’s arched back postures in standing, supine and quadruped poses (Studies 1 and 2) and were asked to rate them for perceived sexual receptivity. In Study 3, a male model was used.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In Study 1 we tested whether the arched back posture in women is an indicator of sexual receptivity. Results showed that both men and women associated increases in the arch of the back with higher sexual receptivity in women. Study 2 predicted and confirmed that sexual receptivity is also perceived from non-standing postures, namely supine and quadruped poses. Study 3 tested the prediction that the perception of sexual receptivity is specific to the posture being adopted by women.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Collectively this research provides support for the sexual receptivity hypothesis of lordosis posture by showing that sexual receptivity is perceived by an increase in the arch of the back (Study 1), it is perceived as sexually receptive irrespective of the body posture (Study 2), and this is specific to women (Study 3).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7178,"journal":{"name":"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology","volume":"9 2","pages":"125 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-023-00212-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Human females may attract men and solicit their approach through different nonverbal displays and signals. In many non-human animals, a lordosis posture in a female is a reliable signal of sexual receptivity. Recently, it has been argued that this posture is linked to a similar signal between men and women. The current research across three investigations aimed to test the predictions arising from the sexual receptivity hypothesis of lordosis posture.

Methods

Using realistic 3D generated stimuli, both men and women viewed women’s arched back postures in standing, supine and quadruped poses (Studies 1 and 2) and were asked to rate them for perceived sexual receptivity. In Study 3, a male model was used.

Results

In Study 1 we tested whether the arched back posture in women is an indicator of sexual receptivity. Results showed that both men and women associated increases in the arch of the back with higher sexual receptivity in women. Study 2 predicted and confirmed that sexual receptivity is also perceived from non-standing postures, namely supine and quadruped poses. Study 3 tested the prediction that the perception of sexual receptivity is specific to the posture being adopted by women.

Conclusion

Collectively this research provides support for the sexual receptivity hypothesis of lordosis posture by showing that sexual receptivity is perceived by an increase in the arch of the back (Study 1), it is perceived as sexually receptive irrespective of the body posture (Study 2), and this is specific to women (Study 3).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前凸姿势(弓起背部)表明女性的性接受能力
目的人类女性可能会通过不同的非语言表现和信号来吸引男性并寻求他们的方法。在许多非人类动物中,雌性前凸姿势是性接受能力的可靠信号。最近,有人认为这种姿势与男性和女性之间的类似信号有关。目前的三项研究旨在检验前凸姿势的性接受性假说的预测。方法使用逼真的3D生成刺激,男性和女性都观察了女性在站立、仰卧和四足姿势中的拱背姿势(研究1和2),并被要求对其感知的性接受能力进行评分。在研究3中,使用了男性模型。结果在研究1中,我们测试了女性的拱背姿势是否是性接受能力的指标。结果显示,男性和女性都认为,女性的性接受能力越高,足弓越大。研究2预测并证实,性接受能力也可以从非站立姿势中感知,即仰卧姿势和四足姿势。研究3检验了对性接受能力的感知是女性所采用的姿势特有的预测。结论总的来说,这项研究为前凸姿势的性接受能力假说提供了支持,表明性接受能力是通过背部足弓的增加来感知的(研究1),无论身体姿势如何,它都被感知为性接受能力(研究2),这是女性特有的(研究3)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology is an international interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes theoretical and empirical studies of any aspects of adaptive human behavior (e.g. cooperation, affiliation, and bonding, competition and aggression, sex and relationships, parenting, decision-making), with emphasis on studies that also address the biological (e.g. neural, endocrine, immune, cardiovascular, genetic) mechanisms controlling behavior.
期刊最新文献
Different Types of Social Feedback can Enhance or Reduce Performance, and Induce or Alleviate Psychosocial Stress: An Exploratory Study of the Underlying Neurophysiological Mechanisms Life History Network in a Postconflict Socioecology: The Effect of Childhood Environment Fathers’ Facial Dominance Predicts First-Born Sons in Parent Dyads Testosterone Concentrations and 2D:4D Digit Ratio in Heterosexual and Masculine and Feminine Lesbian Women Relationship Between Popularity, the Oxytocin Receptor Polymorphism Gene (OXTR rs53576), Emotional Intelligence, and Empathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1