TrustScapes: A Visualisation Tool to Capture Stakeholders’ Concerns and Recommendations About Data Protection, Algorithmic Bias, and Online Safety

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Qualitative Methods Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/16094069231186965
Sachiyo Ito-Jaeger, Giles Lane, L. Dowthwaite, Helena Webb, Menisha Patel, M. Rawsthorne, Virginia Portillo, M. Jirotka, Elvira Perez Vallejos
{"title":"TrustScapes: A Visualisation Tool to Capture Stakeholders’ Concerns and Recommendations About Data Protection, Algorithmic Bias, and Online Safety","authors":"Sachiyo Ito-Jaeger, Giles Lane, L. Dowthwaite, Helena Webb, Menisha Patel, M. Rawsthorne, Virginia Portillo, M. Jirotka, Elvira Perez Vallejos","doi":"10.1177/16094069231186965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a new methodological approach, TrustScapes, an open access tool designed to identify and visualise stakeholders’ concerns and policy recommendations on data protection, algorithmic bias, and online safety for a fairer and more trustworthy online world. We first describe how the tool was co-created with young people and other stakeholders through a series of workshops. We then present two sets of TrustScapes focus groups to illustrate how the tool can be used, and the data analysed. The paper then provides the methodological insights, including the strengths of the TrustScapes and the lessons for future research using TrustScapes. A key strength of this method is that it allows people to visualise their ideas and thoughts on the worksheet, using the keywords and sketches provided. The flexibility in the mode of delivery is another strength of the TrustScapes method. The TrustScapes focus groups can be conducted in a relatively short time (1.5–2 hours), either in person or online depending on the participants’ needs, geological locations, and practicality. Our experience with the TrustScapes offers some lessons (related to the data collection and analysis) for researchers who wish to use this method in the future. Finally, we describe how the outcomes from the TrustScapes focus groups should help to inform future policy decisions.","PeriodicalId":48220,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231186965","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a new methodological approach, TrustScapes, an open access tool designed to identify and visualise stakeholders’ concerns and policy recommendations on data protection, algorithmic bias, and online safety for a fairer and more trustworthy online world. We first describe how the tool was co-created with young people and other stakeholders through a series of workshops. We then present two sets of TrustScapes focus groups to illustrate how the tool can be used, and the data analysed. The paper then provides the methodological insights, including the strengths of the TrustScapes and the lessons for future research using TrustScapes. A key strength of this method is that it allows people to visualise their ideas and thoughts on the worksheet, using the keywords and sketches provided. The flexibility in the mode of delivery is another strength of the TrustScapes method. The TrustScapes focus groups can be conducted in a relatively short time (1.5–2 hours), either in person or online depending on the participants’ needs, geological locations, and practicality. Our experience with the TrustScapes offers some lessons (related to the data collection and analysis) for researchers who wish to use this method in the future. Finally, we describe how the outcomes from the TrustScapes focus groups should help to inform future policy decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TrustScapes:捕捉利益相关者对数据保护、算法偏见和网络安全的担忧和建议的可视化工具
本文提出了一种新的方法论方法TrustScapes,这是一种开放获取工具,旨在识别和可视化利益相关者对数据保护、算法偏见和网络安全的担忧和政策建议,以建立一个更公平、更值得信赖的网络世界。我们首先描述了该工具是如何通过一系列研讨会与年轻人和其他利益相关者共同创建的。然后,我们介绍了两组TrustScapes焦点小组,以说明如何使用该工具以及分析的数据。然后,本文提供了方法论见解,包括TrustScapes的优势以及未来使用TrustScapess进行研究的经验教训。这种方法的一个关键优势是,它允许人们使用提供的关键词和草图,在工作表上可视化他们的想法和想法。交付模式的灵活性是TrustScapes方法的另一个优势。TrustScapes焦点小组可以在相对较短的时间内(1.5-2小时)进行,根据参与者的需求、地理位置和实用性,可以亲自或在线进行。我们在TrustScapes方面的经验为希望在未来使用这种方法的研究人员提供了一些经验(与数据收集和分析有关)。最后,我们描述了TrustScapes焦点小组的结果如何有助于为未来的政策决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
International Journal of Qualitative Methods SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal Highlights Impact Factor: 5.4 Ranked 5/110 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary – SSCI Indexed In: Clarivate Analytics: Social Science Citation Index, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and Scopus Launched In: 2002 Publication is subject to payment of an article processing charge (APC) Submit here International Journal of Qualitative Methods (IJQM) is a peer-reviewed open access journal which focuses on methodological advances, innovations, and insights in qualitative or mixed methods studies. Please see the Aims and Scope tab for further information.
期刊最新文献
Investigating Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity: How Meta-Ethnography Contributes to the Study of Collaborative Research Practices Applying the Visual-Verbal Video Analysis Framework to Understand How Mental Illness is Represented in the TV Show Euphoria “Navigating the In-Between: A Cross-Cultural Researcher’s Fluid Positionality in West Africa” Dealing With Scam in Online Qualitative Research: Strategies and Ethical Considerations Participatory Health Research With Women From Refugee, Asylum-Seeker, and Migrant Backgrounds Living in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1