Between racial madness and neoliberal reason: metonymic contagion in apartheid biopower

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02533952.2023.2167425
Kiasha Naidoo
{"title":"Between racial madness and neoliberal reason: metonymic contagion in apartheid biopower","authors":"Kiasha Naidoo","doi":"10.1080/02533952.2023.2167425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT I will seek to consider the simultaneous workings of race and capital in apartheid biopower. J.M. Coetzee offers a reading of apartheid racism as racial madness which is imbricated with economic reason. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have witnessed instances of the biopolitical making live and letting die. The Strandfontein homeless camp set up just outside Cape Town in 2020 is an instantiation of a particular normative order, wherein contagion was used to justify the movement of black, homeless people outside of the city’s cordon sanitaire. This is resonant of apartheid racial segregation in which the fear of race mixing is sometimes described in terms of contagion where whiteness represents that which is pure while blackness that which is dirty and infectious. Despite this desire for racial separation, apartheid biopower depends on exploitable black labour to sustain white domination. The figurative work of racial contagion is then undercut when the black worker is to be present and available in white areas to work. Neoliberal modes of power inherit the dual work of race and contagion in apartheid when the poor and black are let to die.","PeriodicalId":51765,"journal":{"name":"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"116 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2023.2167425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT I will seek to consider the simultaneous workings of race and capital in apartheid biopower. J.M. Coetzee offers a reading of apartheid racism as racial madness which is imbricated with economic reason. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have witnessed instances of the biopolitical making live and letting die. The Strandfontein homeless camp set up just outside Cape Town in 2020 is an instantiation of a particular normative order, wherein contagion was used to justify the movement of black, homeless people outside of the city’s cordon sanitaire. This is resonant of apartheid racial segregation in which the fear of race mixing is sometimes described in terms of contagion where whiteness represents that which is pure while blackness that which is dirty and infectious. Despite this desire for racial separation, apartheid biopower depends on exploitable black labour to sustain white domination. The figurative work of racial contagion is then undercut when the black worker is to be present and available in white areas to work. Neoliberal modes of power inherit the dual work of race and contagion in apartheid when the poor and black are let to die.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在种族疯狂和新自由主义理性之间:种族隔离生物权力的转喻传染
我将试图考虑种族和资本在种族隔离生物权力中的同时作用。J.M.库切将种族隔离的种族主义解读为一种夹杂着经济原因的种族疯狂。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,我们目睹了生命政治生与死的例子。2020年在开普敦郊外建立的Strandfontein无家可归者营地是一个特定规范秩序的实例,其中传染被用来证明黑人无家可归者在城市卫生警戒线外的运动是正当的。这与种族隔离产生了共鸣种族隔离中对种族混合的恐惧有时被描述为传染病白色代表纯洁而黑色代表肮脏和传染性。尽管有这种种族隔离的愿望,但种族隔离的生物权力依赖于可剥削的黑人劳动力来维持白人的统治。当黑人工人出现在白人地区工作时,种族传染的比喻性工作就被削弱了。新自由主义的权力模式继承了种族和种族隔离的双重作用,当穷人和黑人被允许死亡时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Social Dynamics is the journal of the Centre for African Studies at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. It has been published since 1975, and is committed to advancing interdisciplinary academic research, fostering debate and addressing current issues pertaining to the African continent. Articles cover the full range of humanities and social sciences including anthropology, archaeology, economics, education, history, literary and language studies, music, politics, psychology and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Ke mosali oa Mosotho : reflecting on indigenous conceptions of womanhood in Lesotho Strategic protest and the negotiation of legibility in Cape Town: a case study of Reclaim the City Rituals, family connections, and BoRakgadi Intellectual decolonisation and the danger of epistemic closure: the need for a critical decolonial theory Why recognition? Deciphering justice claims in 2016 Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1