Yi-Ling Wang , Zhao Tian , Xiao-Hong Chang, Hong-Lan Zhu, Heng Cui
{"title":"Influence of assisted reproductive technology and uterine leiomyoma on pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis","authors":"Yi-Ling Wang , Zhao Tian , Xiao-Hong Chang, Hong-Lan Zhu, Heng Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.gocm.2023.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess whether adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis are different according to the method of conception and the concurrent of uterine leiomyoma (UL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective study. Fifty-three singleton pregnancy cases complicated with adenomyosis were included in this study. In the study group, 15 women became pregnant with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and 21 women combined with UL. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between ART and non-ART, UL and non-UL groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence for such complications as hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDCP)and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH)were significantly higher in the women conceived by ART (33.3% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.023) and (53.3% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.037),respectively. And women concurrent with UL of which the diameter≥4 cm were more likely to have severe PPH (44.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.021).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ART may increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as HDCP and PPH in women with adenomyosis and UL of which the diameter≥4 cm may further increase the risk of severe PPH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34826,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 56-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667164623000088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
To assess whether adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis are different according to the method of conception and the concurrent of uterine leiomyoma (UL).
Methods
We performed a retrospective study. Fifty-three singleton pregnancy cases complicated with adenomyosis were included in this study. In the study group, 15 women became pregnant with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and 21 women combined with UL. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between ART and non-ART, UL and non-UL groups.
Results
The prevalence for such complications as hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDCP)and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH)were significantly higher in the women conceived by ART (33.3% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.023) and (53.3% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.037),respectively. And women concurrent with UL of which the diameter≥4 cm were more likely to have severe PPH (44.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.021).
Conclusion
ART may increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as HDCP and PPH in women with adenomyosis and UL of which the diameter≥4 cm may further increase the risk of severe PPH.