The Effect of Extraction Method on Physicochemical Properties of Mucilage Extracted from Yellow and Brown Flaxseeds

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI:10.5812/jjnpp-123952
Mohammad Karim Emadzadeh, A. Aarabi, Farinaz Aarabi Najvani, M. Chiani, M. Mehrabi
{"title":"The Effect of Extraction Method on Physicochemical Properties of Mucilage Extracted from Yellow and Brown Flaxseeds","authors":"Mohammad Karim Emadzadeh, A. Aarabi, Farinaz Aarabi Najvani, M. Chiani, M. Mehrabi","doi":"10.5812/jjnpp-123952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mucilage is an important polysaccharide with a broad range of physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity that is widely used for various applications in the medicine and food industries. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effect of the extraction method on the physicochemical properties of mucilage extracted from yellow and brown flaxseeds. Methods: Mucilage was extracted by different methods: heating, sonotrode, and bath sonication. The extracted mucilage was evaluated for mucilage extraction efficiency (MEE%), solubility, water-binding capacity (WBC%), antioxidant activity, and foam stability. Results: In all extraction methods, the MEE% of yellow flaxseed was significantly higher than that of brown flaxseed. The antioxidant activity of mucilage extracted from brown and yellow flaxseed was 43.65 ± 1.86% and 12.65 ± 1.23%, respectively (P < 0.001). In all extraction methods, the solubility of mucilage was increased by enhancing the temperature. Significantly, higher solubility (P < 0.01) and stronger foam stability (P < 0.001) was obtained for mucilage extracted from brown flaxseed. The highest foam stability was obtained by the sonotrode method. Mucilage extracted by sonotrode and bath sonication methods showed significantly stronger (P < 0.01) water-binding capacity (WBC%) compared to that of the heating method. Conclusions: Our results showed that the ultrasonic methods, especially sonotrode, due to their positive effects on physicochemical properties of mucilage, could be more appropriate methods for extraction of mucilage.","PeriodicalId":17745,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp-123952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Mucilage is an important polysaccharide with a broad range of physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity that is widely used for various applications in the medicine and food industries. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effect of the extraction method on the physicochemical properties of mucilage extracted from yellow and brown flaxseeds. Methods: Mucilage was extracted by different methods: heating, sonotrode, and bath sonication. The extracted mucilage was evaluated for mucilage extraction efficiency (MEE%), solubility, water-binding capacity (WBC%), antioxidant activity, and foam stability. Results: In all extraction methods, the MEE% of yellow flaxseed was significantly higher than that of brown flaxseed. The antioxidant activity of mucilage extracted from brown and yellow flaxseed was 43.65 ± 1.86% and 12.65 ± 1.23%, respectively (P < 0.001). In all extraction methods, the solubility of mucilage was increased by enhancing the temperature. Significantly, higher solubility (P < 0.01) and stronger foam stability (P < 0.001) was obtained for mucilage extracted from brown flaxseed. The highest foam stability was obtained by the sonotrode method. Mucilage extracted by sonotrode and bath sonication methods showed significantly stronger (P < 0.01) water-binding capacity (WBC%) compared to that of the heating method. Conclusions: Our results showed that the ultrasonic methods, especially sonotrode, due to their positive effects on physicochemical properties of mucilage, could be more appropriate methods for extraction of mucilage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提取方法对黄、棕亚麻籽提取物理化性质的影响
背景:黏液是一种重要的多糖,具有广泛的理化性质和抗氧化活性,在医药和食品工业中广泛应用。目的:本研究旨在评价提取方法对黄、棕亚麻籽粘液理化性质的影响。方法:采用不同的提取方法:加热法、超声极法和水浴超声法。对提取的粘液的粘液提取效率(MEE%)、溶解度、水结合能力(WBC%)、抗氧化活性和泡沫稳定性进行了评估。结果:在所有提取方法中,黄色亚麻籽的MEE%均显著高于棕色亚麻籽。从褐色和黄色亚麻籽中提取的粘液的抗氧化活性分别为43.65±1.86%和12.65±1.23%(P<0.001)。在所有提取方法中,粘液的溶解度都随着温度的升高而增加。从棕色亚麻籽中提取的粘液具有更高的溶解度(P<0.01)和更强的泡沫稳定性(P<0.001)。通过超声焊极法获得了最高的泡沫稳定性。与加热法相比,超声焊极和浴超声法提取的粘液具有显著更强的水结合能力(WBC%)(P<0.01)。结论:超声法,特别是超声焊极法,由于其对粘液的理化性质有积极影响,可能是更适合提取粘液的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Phytochemical Content, Anti-inflammatory, Anti-apoptotic, and Antioxidant Activities of Dwarf Elder (Sambucus Ebulus) Against Nasal Polyposis A 4-week Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial on the Use of Grape Seed Extract for Reducing Plasma Glucose, Lipid Profile, and Blood Pressure in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus In Vitro Evaluation of Carvacrol's Wound Healing Capacity in Human Dermal Fibroblasts Grown in High-Glucose Stress Electrospun PVA Nanofibers Loaded with Antimicrobial Herbal Extracts for Healing the Infectious Wound Preventive and Therapeutic Effects of Epicatechin on Acetaminophen-Induced Liver Injury in Mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1