Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-guided Core Needle Biopsy of Abdominal Para-aortic Lesions: A Retrospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Yield and Safety

K. Tomita, T. Iguchi, T. Hiraki, Y. Matsui, M. Uka, T. Komaki, H. Gobara, S. Kanazawa
{"title":"Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-guided Core Needle Biopsy of Abdominal Para-aortic Lesions: A Retrospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Yield and Safety","authors":"K. Tomita, T. Iguchi, T. Hiraki, Y. Matsui, M. Uka, T. Komaki, H. Gobara, S. Kanazawa","doi":"10.22575/interventionalradiology.2020-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of abdominal para-aortic lesions. Material and Methods: CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy was performed for 30 lesions (median long diameter 2.4 cm; range, 1.3-12.4 cm) in 30 patients (11 women and 19 men; median age 64.5 years; age range 37-90 years) using 18- and/or 20-gauge needles. The median length of the biopsy needle tracts was 9.3 cm (range, 5.5-13.0 cm). The median number of biopsy fires was 3 (range, 2-6). The median duration of the procedures was 33 min (range, 14-80 min). The diagnostic yield and adverse events (AEs) were retrospectively evaluated. The AEs were categorized using the Society of Interventional Radiology classification system. Technical success was determined by the acquisition of a sufficient number of specimens for pathological diagnosis. Diagnostic yield was defined as the match between the pathological and final diagnoses. Results: In all 30 procedures, CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsies of the abdominal para-aortic lesions were technically successful. Twenty-six lesions were malignant (9 malignant lymphomas and 17 lymph node [LN] metastases) and four were benign (one schwannoma, one granular cell tumor, and two normal LNs). One case was insufficiently diagnosed as a B-cell lymphoma; thus, the diagnostic yield of the biopsy was 96.7%. AEs occurred in seven procedures (23.3%), including six cases of class A hemorrhage and one case of class B vasovagal reaction. Conclusions: CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of abdominal para-aortic lesions is a safe procedure and provides a high diagnostic yield.","PeriodicalId":73503,"journal":{"name":"Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)","volume":"5 1","pages":"128 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2020-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of abdominal para-aortic lesions. Material and Methods: CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy was performed for 30 lesions (median long diameter 2.4 cm; range, 1.3-12.4 cm) in 30 patients (11 women and 19 men; median age 64.5 years; age range 37-90 years) using 18- and/or 20-gauge needles. The median length of the biopsy needle tracts was 9.3 cm (range, 5.5-13.0 cm). The median number of biopsy fires was 3 (range, 2-6). The median duration of the procedures was 33 min (range, 14-80 min). The diagnostic yield and adverse events (AEs) were retrospectively evaluated. The AEs were categorized using the Society of Interventional Radiology classification system. Technical success was determined by the acquisition of a sufficient number of specimens for pathological diagnosis. Diagnostic yield was defined as the match between the pathological and final diagnoses. Results: In all 30 procedures, CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsies of the abdominal para-aortic lesions were technically successful. Twenty-six lesions were malignant (9 malignant lymphomas and 17 lymph node [LN] metastases) and four were benign (one schwannoma, one granular cell tumor, and two normal LNs). One case was insufficiently diagnosed as a B-cell lymphoma; thus, the diagnostic yield of the biopsy was 96.7%. AEs occurred in seven procedures (23.3%), including six cases of class A hemorrhage and one case of class B vasovagal reaction. Conclusions: CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of abdominal para-aortic lesions is a safe procedure and provides a high diagnostic yield.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机断层扫描荧光镜引导下腹部主动脉旁病变的核心针活检:诊断率和安全性的回顾性评估
目的:回顾性评价计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下腹主动脉旁病变活检的诊断率和安全性。材料与方法:CT透视引导下活检病变30例(中位长直径2.4 cm;范围:1.3-12.4 cm), 30例患者(11例女性,19例男性;中位年龄64.5岁;年龄范围37-90岁)使用18和/或20号针。活检针束的中位长度为9.3 cm(范围5.5 ~ 13.0 cm)。活检着火的中位数为3(范围2-6)。手术中位持续时间为33分钟(范围14-80分钟)。回顾性评价诊断率和不良事件(ae)。采用介入放射学会分类系统对ae进行分类。技术上的成功取决于获得足够数量的病理诊断标本。诊断率定义为病理诊断与最终诊断的匹配。结果:在所有30例手术中,CT透视引导下的腹主动脉旁病变活检在技术上是成功的。26例为恶性(9例为恶性淋巴瘤,17例为淋巴结转移),4例为良性(1例为神经鞘瘤,1例为颗粒细胞瘤,2例为正常淋巴结)。1例未充分诊断为b细胞淋巴瘤;因此,活检的诊断率为96.7%。7例(23.3%)发生ae,其中A类出血6例,B类血管迷走神经反应1例。结论:CT透视引导下腹主动脉旁病变活检是一种安全的方法,诊断率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Cutaneous Nerve Block in Balloon Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Vascular Access Stenosis: A Pain Management Strategy. A Case of a Right Gastric Artery Aneurysm Caused by the Collateral Flow Changes Due to the Coexistence of Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome and a Celiac Artery Anomaly. Is Saline Sealing of Needle Tract Effective to Prevent Pneumothorax after Computed Tomography-guided Lung Biopsy? A Case of Superior Mesenteric Artery Occlusion Caused by Portal Vein Stenting. Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Treating Fibrin Sheath-induced Central Venous Port System Dysfunction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1