Application of non-linear models in description of growth of dual purpose FUNAAB Alpha chickens

So Durosaro, O. S. Jeje, B. Ilori, O. S. Iyasere, M. Ozoje
{"title":"Application of non-linear models in description of growth of dual purpose FUNAAB Alpha chickens","authors":"So Durosaro, O. S. Jeje, B. Ilori, O. S. Iyasere, M. Ozoje","doi":"10.17170/KOBRA-202107134318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growth is explained mathematically by models that have parameters with biological interpretations. This study was conducted to compare five non-linear growth models (Gompertz, Brody, Logistics, Von Bertalanffy and Negative exponential) in order to describe growth in the three genotypes (normal feather, naked neck and frizzle feather) of the dual purpose FUNAAB Alpha chickens (n=332). Doesn’t Use Derivative iterative method of nonlinear procedure in SAS was used to estimate the model parameters. Computational difficultly, goodness of fit and residuals of the five models were also evaluated. Negative exponential model predicted the highest mature weight for the three genotypes while Logistics model predicted the highest coefficient of intensity of growth. The fitting of the five models presented no computational difficulty for normal feather chickens while Logistics failed to converge for male, naked neck and frizzle feather chickens. Based on goodness of fit (coefficient of determination, Bayesian information criterion, mean square error and residuals), Gompertz model was observed to have the best fit for normal feather and naked neck chickens while Brody model have the best fit for frizzle feather chickens and Von Bertalanffy for male chickens. From subjective approach (comparison of observed and predicted body weights),  Logistics and Negative exponential models fitted well for normal feather than other models while Negative exponential model was the fittest among the models for naked neck and frizzle feather chickens and Gompertz for female chickens. It can be concluded that choice of appropriate model in description of growth depends on genotype and sex of dual purpose FUNAAB Alpha chickens.","PeriodicalId":54889,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics","volume":"122 1","pages":"147-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17170/KOBRA-202107134318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Growth is explained mathematically by models that have parameters with biological interpretations. This study was conducted to compare five non-linear growth models (Gompertz, Brody, Logistics, Von Bertalanffy and Negative exponential) in order to describe growth in the three genotypes (normal feather, naked neck and frizzle feather) of the dual purpose FUNAAB Alpha chickens (n=332). Doesn’t Use Derivative iterative method of nonlinear procedure in SAS was used to estimate the model parameters. Computational difficultly, goodness of fit and residuals of the five models were also evaluated. Negative exponential model predicted the highest mature weight for the three genotypes while Logistics model predicted the highest coefficient of intensity of growth. The fitting of the five models presented no computational difficulty for normal feather chickens while Logistics failed to converge for male, naked neck and frizzle feather chickens. Based on goodness of fit (coefficient of determination, Bayesian information criterion, mean square error and residuals), Gompertz model was observed to have the best fit for normal feather and naked neck chickens while Brody model have the best fit for frizzle feather chickens and Von Bertalanffy for male chickens. From subjective approach (comparison of observed and predicted body weights),  Logistics and Negative exponential models fitted well for normal feather than other models while Negative exponential model was the fittest among the models for naked neck and frizzle feather chickens and Gompertz for female chickens. It can be concluded that choice of appropriate model in description of growth depends on genotype and sex of dual purpose FUNAAB Alpha chickens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非线性模型在两用FUNAAB Alpha鸡生长描述中的应用
生长是通过具有生物学解释参数的模型进行数学解释的。本研究比较了五种非线性生长模型(Gompertz、Brody、Logistics、Von Bertalanffy和负指数),以描述两用FUNAAB Alpha鸡(n=332)三种基因型(正常羽毛、裸颈和卷曲羽毛)的生长。不使用SAS中非线性过程的导数迭代方法来估计模型参数。并对五个模型的计算难度、拟合优度和残差进行了评价。负指数模型预测三种基因型的成熟重最高,而物流模型预测的生长强度系数最高。五个模型的拟合对普通羽毛鸡没有计算困难,而Logistics对雄性、裸颈和卷曲羽毛鸡没有收敛。根据拟合优度(决定系数、贝叶斯信息准则、均方误差和残差),Gompertz模型对正常羽毛鸡和裸颈鸡的拟合最好,Brody模型对卷曲羽毛鸡的拟合最好,Von Bertalanffy模型对雄鸡的拟合最佳。从主观方法(观察和预测体重的比较)来看,Logistics和负指数模型比其他模型更适合正常羽毛,而负指数模型在裸颈和卷曲羽毛鸡的模型中是最合适的,Gompertz模型在雌鸡中是最适合的。可以得出结论,描述生长的合适模型的选择取决于两用FUNAAB Alpha鸡的基因型和性别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics publishes papers dealing with original research and review papers in the fields of plant production, animal nutrition and animal husbandry, soil science, rural economy and farm management, forestry and forest economy, veterinary hygiene and protection against epidemics.
期刊最新文献
Danny Santa Fe Forage diversity and fertiliser adoption in Napier grass production among smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya Drivers of adaptation to climate change in vulnerable farming communities: a micro analysis of rice farmers in Ndop, Cameroon Genotypic differences in body weight and physiological response of local and exotic turkeys challenged with Salmonella typhimurium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1