Characteristics of splitting family tax benefit and strategies of those choosing the splitting

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Public Finance Quarterly-Hungary Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.35551/pfq_2023_2_1
Éva Szabóné Bonifert
{"title":"Characteristics of splitting family tax benefit and strategies of those choosing the splitting","authors":"Éva Szabóné Bonifert","doi":"10.35551/pfq_2023_2_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examines data regarding splitting of family tax benefit received upon children in personal income taxation and the strategies of those splitting the tax benefit. The purpose of the investigation is to analyse proportions of sharing and principles of couples who split the family tax benefit each other, increasing or decreasing each other’s financial opportunities. During the investigations, starting from a general analysis of the thousand people sample of family tax benefit beneficiaries from personal income tax return, we examined more detailed data of those who fully realized the family tax benefit. In the course of the examination we set up theoretical strategies for the analysis of the possible ways of splitting the tax benefit in order to check their matching with real data. The sharing strategy identifiable in the highest proportion was realizing the family tax benefit by 50%-50% by family members, which is influenced primarily by the realizing preferences of families with two children. A theoretical decision-making strategy has been identified in the case of more than half of the families fully realising family tax benefit. It has been found that, after the use in a fifty-fifty ratio, the preference of fathers’ recourse is slightly stronger than mothers’ due to the impact of families with three or more children. This is also typical of cases not identified with a specific strategy. The reason of preferring fathers’ recourse is mostly the idea that who has a larger tax base should use the tax benefit. However, this is not typical for giving preference to maternal use. Our findings indicate that families most often decide on the simplest solution that still can be considered rational, when sharing family tax benefit, which decision is differentiated according to the number of children.","PeriodicalId":42979,"journal":{"name":"Public Finance Quarterly-Hungary","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Finance Quarterly-Hungary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35551/pfq_2023_2_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examines data regarding splitting of family tax benefit received upon children in personal income taxation and the strategies of those splitting the tax benefit. The purpose of the investigation is to analyse proportions of sharing and principles of couples who split the family tax benefit each other, increasing or decreasing each other’s financial opportunities. During the investigations, starting from a general analysis of the thousand people sample of family tax benefit beneficiaries from personal income tax return, we examined more detailed data of those who fully realized the family tax benefit. In the course of the examination we set up theoretical strategies for the analysis of the possible ways of splitting the tax benefit in order to check their matching with real data. The sharing strategy identifiable in the highest proportion was realizing the family tax benefit by 50%-50% by family members, which is influenced primarily by the realizing preferences of families with two children. A theoretical decision-making strategy has been identified in the case of more than half of the families fully realising family tax benefit. It has been found that, after the use in a fifty-fifty ratio, the preference of fathers’ recourse is slightly stronger than mothers’ due to the impact of families with three or more children. This is also typical of cases not identified with a specific strategy. The reason of preferring fathers’ recourse is mostly the idea that who has a larger tax base should use the tax benefit. However, this is not typical for giving preference to maternal use. Our findings indicate that families most often decide on the simplest solution that still can be considered rational, when sharing family tax benefit, which decision is differentiated according to the number of children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭税收优惠分割的特点及选择分割的策略
该研究调查了有关个人所得税中家庭对子女的税收优惠分割的数据,以及这些税收优惠分割的策略。调查的目的是分析分享的比例和原则的夫妻谁分裂的家庭税收相互受益,增加或减少彼此的财务机会。在调查过程中,我们从对个人所得税申报表中家庭税收优惠受益人的千人样本进行总体分析入手,对充分实现家庭税收优惠的人群进行了更详细的数据考察。在考察过程中,我们对税收优惠分割的可能方式进行了理论策略分析,以检验其与实际数据的匹配性。比例最高的共享策略是家庭成员实现50%-50%的家庭税收优惠,主要受二孩家庭实现偏好的影响。在半数以上家庭充分实现家庭税收优惠的情况下,确定了一种理论上的决策策略。研究发现,在按五五比例使用后,由于有三个或更多孩子的家庭的影响,父亲的追索权偏好略强于母亲。这在没有特定策略的情况下也是典型的。偏爱父亲追索权的主要原因是,税基更大的人应该利用税收优惠。然而,这并不典型地优先考虑产妇使用。我们的研究结果表明,在共享家庭税收优惠时,家庭通常会选择最简单的仍然可以被认为是理性的解决方案,这种决定根据子女的数量而区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
40.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
A stagflation-proof bill of exchange circulation model – Presentation and evaluation Integration of financial institutions supported with data asset development – Magyar Bankholding case study Rule-based budgeting and the financial stability – the European solution Handling outliers in bankruptcy prediction models based on logistic regression Euro area economic growth between 2010 and 2019 in the light of secular stagnation theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1