Role and significance of legal customs in national jurisdictions (in terms of the Russian Federation)

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Dixi Pub Date : 2021-12-24 DOI:10.16925/2357-5891.2022.01.09
Aleksey Pavlovich Anisimov, Anatoliy Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Lyudmila Viktorovna Sokolskaya
{"title":"Role and significance of legal customs in national jurisdictions (in terms of the Russian Federation)","authors":"Aleksey Pavlovich Anisimov, Anatoliy Jakovlevich Ryzhenkov, Lyudmila Viktorovna Sokolskaya","doi":"10.16925/2357-5891.2022.01.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Russian legal science, there is an established opinion that today legal custom plays a secondary role in the system of sources of law, or even that it is a rudiment and is not required in regulation of social relations anyway. This position of scientists is explained by the fact that theories rejecting custom as a source of law were common in the ussr since the 1920s. There were numerous attempts to substantiate the impossibility and needlessness of its use in a socialist state. It was justified by the fact that custom is a “primitive” form of law that is not capable of efficiently regulating social relations and even hinders their development. Having studied the modern practice of application of customs in various branches of private and public law, the authors give reasons for the conclusion that the scope of legal customs still retains its significance in Russia. It is proved that the role of customs differs in respect of fields of private and public law, occupying an insignificant place within the latter. However, also in that case there is transformation of established ideas about legal customs, their position in the system of sources of law and the role in the system of legal regulation of social relations are revised. The authors of the article substantiate the need to preserve legal custom in the system of sources of law and propose measures to increase the efficiency of their use.","PeriodicalId":40362,"journal":{"name":"Dixi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dixi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16925/2357-5891.2022.01.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Russian legal science, there is an established opinion that today legal custom plays a secondary role in the system of sources of law, or even that it is a rudiment and is not required in regulation of social relations anyway. This position of scientists is explained by the fact that theories rejecting custom as a source of law were common in the ussr since the 1920s. There were numerous attempts to substantiate the impossibility and needlessness of its use in a socialist state. It was justified by the fact that custom is a “primitive” form of law that is not capable of efficiently regulating social relations and even hinders their development. Having studied the modern practice of application of customs in various branches of private and public law, the authors give reasons for the conclusion that the scope of legal customs still retains its significance in Russia. It is proved that the role of customs differs in respect of fields of private and public law, occupying an insignificant place within the latter. However, also in that case there is transformation of established ideas about legal customs, their position in the system of sources of law and the role in the system of legal regulation of social relations are revised. The authors of the article substantiate the need to preserve legal custom in the system of sources of law and propose measures to increase the efficiency of their use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律习俗在国家管辖范围内的作用和意义(以俄罗斯联邦为例)
在俄罗斯法学中,有一种既定的观点认为,今天的法律习惯在法律渊源体系中起着次要的作用,甚至认为它是一个雏形,无论如何都不是调节社会关系所必需的。科学家的这种立场可以用这样一个事实来解释:自20世纪20年代以来,拒绝将习俗作为法律渊源的理论在苏联很常见。有许多人试图证明在社会主义国家不可能和没有必要使用它。习俗是一种“原始的”法律形式,它不能有效地调节社会关系,甚至阻碍社会关系的发展。通过对现代私法和公法各部门的海关适用实践的研究,作者给出了法律海关范围在俄罗斯仍然保持其意义的结论的理由。事实证明,习惯法在私法和公法领域的作用是不同的,在公法领域中所占的地位微不足道。然而,在这种情况下,关于法律习俗的既定观念也发生了转变,它们在法律渊源体系中的地位以及在法律调节社会关系体系中的作用都得到了修正。本文作者论证了在法律渊源制度中保留法律习惯的必要性,并提出了提高法律渊源制度使用效率的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dixi
Dixi LAW-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Análisis jurisprudencial sobre la protección del trabajador campesino en Colombia La necesidad de un marco ético y legal obligatorio para la inteligencia artificial y los algoritmos en Colombia Regulación legal de la gobernanza de asuntos exteriores : experiencia extranjera para Ucrania Interaction of law enforcement bodies of Ukraine in disclosure of offenses and crimes: Saberes locales rurales para la sustentabilidad del recurso hídrico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1