Interactions in engaged work teams: a qualitative study

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Team Performance Management Pub Date : 2017-08-07 DOI:10.1108/TPM-12-2016-0054
Patrícia L. Costa, A. Passos, A. Bakker, R. Romana, Cláudia Ferrão
{"title":"Interactions in engaged work teams: a qualitative study","authors":"Patrícia L. Costa, A. Passos, A. Bakker, R. Romana, Cláudia Ferrão","doi":"10.1108/TPM-12-2016-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe aim of this study is to describe work-engaged teams in terms of interpersonal interaction. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nSix teams (N = 31 individuals) were videotaped during a decision-making task, for one hour. Based on a priori defined categories, the authors coded the videos in terms of the degree of interaction between team members, the physical distance between members, the degree of team’s activation and the valence of their interaction. The videos were also coded in terms of motivational and affective processes. Team work engagement was assessed using questionnaires. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nHighly engaged team members work physically close and have an increment on their interactions up until the task’s temporal midpoint. They have an initial peak of activation and show more positive emotional valence in the first and the last moments of the task. The most interpersonal processes used are affective. The worst performing team had the highest initial interaction levels followed by an abrupt decrease both in their levels of interaction and in their levels of activation. Simultaneously, they present higher peaks of positive emotional valence. \n \n \n \n \nPractical implications \n \n \n \n \nAlthough engaged teams are essentially characterized by the presence of positive interactions, it is fundamental to alternate more “exited” and fun moments with more task focused ones and collective interaction moments with individual work. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThis study answers to Kozlowski and Chao’s (2012) call for studying emergence in a more direct way, using qualitative analysis of video data.","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"23 1","pages":"206-226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/TPM-12-2016-0054","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Team Performance Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-12-2016-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study is to describe work-engaged teams in terms of interpersonal interaction. Design/methodology/approach Six teams (N = 31 individuals) were videotaped during a decision-making task, for one hour. Based on a priori defined categories, the authors coded the videos in terms of the degree of interaction between team members, the physical distance between members, the degree of team’s activation and the valence of their interaction. The videos were also coded in terms of motivational and affective processes. Team work engagement was assessed using questionnaires. Findings Highly engaged team members work physically close and have an increment on their interactions up until the task’s temporal midpoint. They have an initial peak of activation and show more positive emotional valence in the first and the last moments of the task. The most interpersonal processes used are affective. The worst performing team had the highest initial interaction levels followed by an abrupt decrease both in their levels of interaction and in their levels of activation. Simultaneously, they present higher peaks of positive emotional valence. Practical implications Although engaged teams are essentially characterized by the presence of positive interactions, it is fundamental to alternate more “exited” and fun moments with more task focused ones and collective interaction moments with individual work. Originality/value This study answers to Kozlowski and Chao’s (2012) call for studying emergence in a more direct way, using qualitative analysis of video data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与工作团队中的互动:一项定性研究
目的本研究的目的是从人际互动的角度描述参与工作的团队。设计/方法/方法六个小组(N=31人)在一项决策任务中被录像一小时。基于先验定义的类别,作者根据团队成员之间的互动程度、成员之间的物理距离、团队的激活程度和互动的效价对视频进行了编码。视频还根据动机和情感过程进行了编码。使用问卷对团队工作参与度进行评估。研究结果高度投入的团队成员身体紧密地工作,他们的互动会增加,直到任务的时间中点。他们有一个最初的激活高峰,在任务的第一和最后时刻表现出更积极的情绪效价。大多数人际交往过程都是情感性的。表现最差的团队最初的互动水平最高,随后他们的互动水平和激活水平都急剧下降。同时,他们呈现出更高的积极情绪效价峰值。实际意义尽管参与的团队本质上以积极互动为特征,但将更“兴奋”和有趣的时刻与更专注于任务的时刻以及集体互动时刻与个人工作交替进行是至关重要的。原创性/价值本研究回应了Kozlowski和Chao(2012)的呼吁,即使用视频数据的定性分析,以更直接的方式研究涌现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
29.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This international journal contributes to the successful implementation and development of work teams and team-based organizations by providing a forum for sharing experience and learning to stimulate thought and transfer of ideas. It seeks to bridge the gap between research and practice by publishing articles where the claims are evidence-based and the conclusions have practical value. Effective teams form the heart of every successful organization. But team management is one of the hardest challenges faced by managers.
期刊最新文献
“They don’t take notes!” Tensions perceived by first-line workers in an action research project Digital team coaching for workplace communication: longitudinal evaluation of recipients’ perceptions How leader humility influences team reflexivity: a team level analysis The double-edged sword effect of psychological safety climate: a theoretical framework A comparative multi criteria decision analysis of football teams: evidence on FIFA world cup
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1