Hobbes’s Strategy of Convergence

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Hobbes Studies Pub Date : 2020-11-11 DOI:10.1163/18750257-bja10017

A. McQueen

引用次数: 1

Abstract

In his political works, Thomas Hobbes proliferates arguments and overdetermines his conclusions. This article hypothesizes that at least some of this overdetermination was intentional. It was part of a “convergent strategy” meant to appeal to a broad, diverse, and unknown audience. The article draws on Leviathan to offer evidence for this hypothesis.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

霍布斯的趋同策略

在他的政治作品中，托马斯·霍布斯的论点激增，并过分确定了他的结论。这篇文章假设，至少有一部分这种过度确定是故意的。这是“趋同战略”的一部分，旨在吸引广泛、多样化和未知的受众。这篇文章引用了利维坦为这一假说提供了证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Hobbes Studies PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Hobbes Studies is an international peer reviewed scholarly journal. Its interests are twofold; first, in publishing research about the philosophical, political, historical, literary, and scientific matters related to Thomas Hobbes"s own thought, at the beginning of the modern state and the rise of science, and also in a comparison of his views to other important thinkers; second, because of Hobbes"s enduring influence in stimulating social and political theory, the journal is interested in publishing such discussions. Articles and occasional book reviews are peer reviewed. The International Hobbes Association is associated with the journal but submissions are open.

期刊最新文献

Archibald Campbell, Critic of Hobbes Transubstantiation, Absurdity, and the Religious Imagination: Hobbes and Rational Christianity Hobbes, Locke, and the Christian Commonwealth Hobbes and Locke: Meaning, Method, Modernity: Introduction A Note from the Editor