{"title":"Hungry Listening: Resonant Theory for Indigenous Sound Studies","authors":"Sarah Quick","doi":"10.1215/00141801-10117336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"S P R I N G & F A L L 2 0 2 0 W I C A Z O S A R E V I E W Hungry Listening is a disciplinary reckoning. The book argues that settlers listen to Indigenous music and sounds through settler colonial musical logics. This book has two primary audiences: Indigenous and nonIndigenous. Some of the moments directed to Indigenous readers are open to nonIndigenous readers like myself to witness and learn. Others contain unexplained knowledge or exist in spaces where I am not invited. Robinson also directly asks nonIndigenous readers to name and reject settler logics of listening, composing, performing, and writing. Robinson hopes for transformative intersectional work between Indigenous and nonIndigenous scholars. He models this intersectional work in Hungry Listening by drawing on multiple disciplines and speaking to multiple positionalities. The book title is a concept developed by Robinson, which he explains in the introduction. It is an English translation of two Halq’eméylem words: (1) shxwelítemelh (“the adjective for settler or white person’s methods/things” [p. 2]), which is based on the word Stó:l ̄ o people (xwélmexw) used for starving White settlers in the midnineteenthcentury gold rush; and (2) xwélalà:m (listening). Robinson also provides an overview of his critique of “inclusionary music” and “inclusionary performance” as musical contexts in which Indigenous content is mined for aesthetic interest and “fit”— or assimilated— into Hungry Listening: Resonant Theory for Indigenous Sound Studies by Dylan Robinson University of Minnesota Press, 2020","PeriodicalId":51776,"journal":{"name":"Ethnohistory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnohistory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-10117336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
S P R I N G & F A L L 2 0 2 0 W I C A Z O S A R E V I E W Hungry Listening is a disciplinary reckoning. The book argues that settlers listen to Indigenous music and sounds through settler colonial musical logics. This book has two primary audiences: Indigenous and nonIndigenous. Some of the moments directed to Indigenous readers are open to nonIndigenous readers like myself to witness and learn. Others contain unexplained knowledge or exist in spaces where I am not invited. Robinson also directly asks nonIndigenous readers to name and reject settler logics of listening, composing, performing, and writing. Robinson hopes for transformative intersectional work between Indigenous and nonIndigenous scholars. He models this intersectional work in Hungry Listening by drawing on multiple disciplines and speaking to multiple positionalities. The book title is a concept developed by Robinson, which he explains in the introduction. It is an English translation of two Halq’eméylem words: (1) shxwelítemelh (“the adjective for settler or white person’s methods/things” [p. 2]), which is based on the word Stó:l ̄ o people (xwélmexw) used for starving White settlers in the midnineteenthcentury gold rush; and (2) xwélalà:m (listening). Robinson also provides an overview of his critique of “inclusionary music” and “inclusionary performance” as musical contexts in which Indigenous content is mined for aesthetic interest and “fit”— or assimilated— into Hungry Listening: Resonant Theory for Indigenous Sound Studies by Dylan Robinson University of Minnesota Press, 2020
你的听力是一种纪律的清算。你的听力是一种纪律的清算。这本书认为,定居者通过定居者的殖民音乐逻辑来聆听土著音乐和声音。这本书有两个主要的读者:土著和非土著。一些针对土著读者的时刻也对像我这样的非土著读者开放,可以见证和学习。还有一些包含无法解释的知识,或者存在于我不被邀请的地方。罗宾逊还直接要求非土著读者说出并拒绝定居者关于听、作曲、表演和写作的逻辑。罗宾逊希望在土著和非土著学者之间进行变革性的交叉研究。他在《饥饿的倾听》中模仿了这种交叉的工作,利用了多个学科和多个立场。书名是罗宾逊提出的一个概念,他在前言中对此进行了解释。它是两个Halq ' emsamylem单词的英文翻译:(1)shxwelítemelh(“定居者或白人的方法/事物的形容词”[p. 1]。[2]),它基于Stó这个词:l ā o people (xw录影带),用于19世纪中期淘金热中饥饿的白人定居者;(2) xw lalacom:m(听)。罗宾逊还概述了他对“包容性音乐”和“包容性表演”的批评,将其作为音乐背景,在这些音乐背景中,土著内容被挖掘用于审美兴趣,并“适合”或同化于明尼苏达大学迪伦·罗宾逊出版社2020年出版的《饥饿倾听:土著声音研究的共振理论》
期刊介绍:
Ethnohistory reflects the wide range of current scholarship inspired by anthropological and historical approaches to the human condition. Of particular interest are those analyses and interpretations that seek to make evident the experience, organization, and identities of indigenous, diasporic, and minority peoples that otherwise elude the histories and anthropologies of nations, states, and colonial empires. The journal publishes work from the disciplines of geography, literature, sociology, and archaeology, as well as anthropology and history. It welcomes theoretical and cross-cultural discussion of ethnohistorical materials and recognizes the wide range of academic disciplines.