Understanding the role of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in the “central government-local government-society” framework: a case study on public crisis management during the pandemic in China

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION International Public Management Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.1080/10967494.2022.2115595
Xueying Chen
{"title":"Understanding the role of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in the “central government-local government-society” framework: a case study on public crisis management during the pandemic in China","authors":"Xueying Chen","doi":"10.1080/10967494.2022.2115595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study unravels the complexity of government-CSOs relations in China by distinguishing the roles of the central government and local governments and develops a “central government-local government-society” framework. Investigations into the “central government-local government-society” interactions in a public crisis management case during the COVID-19 pandemic reveal the key features of government-CSOs interactions in China: i) the central-local tension shapes the demand for the society’s participation in public governance as an additional influencer, and the presence of citizen groups as the critical audience has influenced the way central and local governments interact; ii) the central government and the society empower each other in public governance, and the central government’s capability of turning CSOs into partners secures the mutual beneficial relation between them; iii) the fragmentation of the local government and its affiliated institutions leads to the co-existence of the conflicting modes of government-CSOs interactions at the local level, which is the institutional basis for the survival and growth of CSOs even in localities with very conservative local political environments. It turns out that distinguishing the roles of heterogenous “state” actors helps to unravel the complexity of government-CSOs relations and provides new insights into the role of CSOs.","PeriodicalId":47671,"journal":{"name":"International Public Management Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"570 - 588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Public Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2115595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study unravels the complexity of government-CSOs relations in China by distinguishing the roles of the central government and local governments and develops a “central government-local government-society” framework. Investigations into the “central government-local government-society” interactions in a public crisis management case during the COVID-19 pandemic reveal the key features of government-CSOs interactions in China: i) the central-local tension shapes the demand for the society’s participation in public governance as an additional influencer, and the presence of citizen groups as the critical audience has influenced the way central and local governments interact; ii) the central government and the society empower each other in public governance, and the central government’s capability of turning CSOs into partners secures the mutual beneficial relation between them; iii) the fragmentation of the local government and its affiliated institutions leads to the co-existence of the conflicting modes of government-CSOs interactions at the local level, which is the institutional basis for the survival and growth of CSOs even in localities with very conservative local political environments. It turns out that distinguishing the roles of heterogenous “state” actors helps to unravel the complexity of government-CSOs relations and provides new insights into the role of CSOs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解公民社会组织在“中央政府-地方政府-社会”框架中的作用:中国疫情期间公共危机管理案例研究
本研究通过区分中央政府和地方政府的角色,揭示了中国政府与民间社会组织关系的复杂性,并构建了“中央政府-地方政府-社会”的框架。对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间公共危机管理案例中“中央-地方-社会”互动的调查揭示了中国政府-公民社会组织互动的关键特征:1)中央-地方紧张关系塑造了社会作为额外影响者参与公共治理的需求,公民团体作为关键受众的存在影响了中央和地方政府的互动方式;(2)中央政府与社会在公共治理中相互赋能,中央政府将民间社会组织转化为合作伙伴的能力确保了两者之间的互利关系;(3)地方政府及其附属机构的碎片化导致地方政府与民间社会组织互动的冲突模式并存,这是民间社会组织在地方政治环境非常保守的地方也能生存和成长的制度基础。结果表明,区分异质“国家”行为体的角色有助于揭示政府与公民社会组织关系的复杂性,并为公民社会组织的角色提供新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The International Public Management Journal (IPMJ) publishes high-quality empirical and theoretical work on managing large organizations, particularly public organizations. IPMJ features work from scholars around the world who conduct research in the areas of public management and government reform, comparative public administration, organizational theory, and organizational behavior. IPMJ seeks to provide a bridge between those conducting research on public management and public administration on the one hand, and those working in the areas of organizational behavior and organization theory on the other. IPMJ intends to stimulate and reflect the academic interests of an international constituency of readers and scholars.
期刊最新文献
It takes two to tango: concepts and evidence of further integration of public service motivation theory and self-determination theory Deliberative Democracy, Public Policy, and Local Government Public value and the digital economy Controversies in employee-driven innovation: Exploring the Danish public healthcare Transforming public and private sector organizations: Implementing sustainable purpose, traveling organization and connectivity for resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1