The child support grant and childbearing in South Africa: is there a case for a basic income grant?

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/03796205.2021.1978858
Umakrishnan Kollamparambil
{"title":"The child support grant and childbearing in South Africa: is there a case for a basic income grant?","authors":"Umakrishnan Kollamparambil","doi":"10.1080/03796205.2021.1978858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This is the first study in South Africa analysing the impact of the child support grant (CSG) on higher-order fertility behaviour based on a nationally representative dataset. The study uses the fifth wave of national income dynamics study (NIDS) survey data covering women from age 15 to 58 years to undertake the propensity score matching technique to ascertain whether the CSG grant drives fertility behaviour. The findings indicate that, while the CSG does not have a significant impact on fertility rates among teen mothers, older mothers from the age of 20 upwards to 58 years receiving the CSG have significantly more children compared to those that do not receive the grant, even after controlling for other relevant precursors and factoring in self-selection issues. This study underscores the need to consider the perverse incentives while designing social policy.","PeriodicalId":55873,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","volume":"45 1","pages":"88 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03796205.2021.1978858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This is the first study in South Africa analysing the impact of the child support grant (CSG) on higher-order fertility behaviour based on a nationally representative dataset. The study uses the fifth wave of national income dynamics study (NIDS) survey data covering women from age 15 to 58 years to undertake the propensity score matching technique to ascertain whether the CSG grant drives fertility behaviour. The findings indicate that, while the CSG does not have a significant impact on fertility rates among teen mothers, older mothers from the age of 20 upwards to 58 years receiving the CSG have significantly more children compared to those that do not receive the grant, even after controlling for other relevant precursors and factoring in self-selection issues. This study underscores the need to consider the perverse incentives while designing social policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非的子女抚养补助金和生育:是否有基本收入补助金的理由?
这是南非第一项基于全国代表性数据集分析儿童抚养费(CSG)对高阶生育行为影响的研究。该研究使用第五波国民收入动态研究(NIDS)调查数据,涵盖15至58岁的妇女,采用倾向得分匹配技术,以确定CSG赠款是否驱动生育行为。研究结果表明,虽然补助金对青少年母亲的生育率没有显著影响,但接受补助金的年龄在20岁至58岁之间的老年母亲比没有接受补助金的母亲生育的孩子明显更多,即使在控制了其他相关的前驱因素并考虑到自我选择问题之后也是如此。这项研究强调了在设计社会政策时考虑不正当激励的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Published by the Bureau for Economic Research and the Graduate School of Business, University of Stellenbosch. Articles in the field of study of Economics (in the widest sense of the word).
期刊最新文献
Structural estimates of the South African sacrifice ratio Central Bank Independence and Inflation in India: The Role of Financial Development Threshold effects of regional fiscal stress index on employment Benchmarking an allocation to the foreign Sub-portfolio from a South African perspective Assessment of the impact of government response measures on the spread of COVID-19: panel data evidence for 50 countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1