Emergency responders’ moral sensemaking: the influence of compartmentalization

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Emergency Services Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:10.1108/ijes-10-2021-0069
J. Kalkman, E. Kramer
{"title":"Emergency responders’ moral sensemaking: the influence of compartmentalization","authors":"J. Kalkman, E. Kramer","doi":"10.1108/ijes-10-2021-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeEmergency organizations allocate specific tasks to responders in an attempt to resolve increasingly complex incidents. Many studies take a pragmatic perspective by studying how emergency organizations can more effectively compartmentalize response tasks. Yet, the effects of compartmentalization on responders' sensemaking of moral issues (i.e. moral sensemaking) has received almost no attention.Design/methodology/approachBased on existing research, the authors bring together different insights on the relation between compartmentalization and emergency responders’ sensemaking of moral issues.FindingsThe authors demonstrate that emergency organizations may undermine the moral sensemaking of responders through introducing moral blind spots and moral dissociation or, instead, enable moral sensemaking through enhancing moral agency and awareness. The authors argue that emergency organizations need to induce moral sense-discrediting among responders to enhance their moral sensemaking. Finally, the authors conclude with discussing two types of compartmentalizing tasks, functional concentration and the holographic metaphor, to show that the latter is most likely to enhance moral sensemaking among emergency responders.Originality/valueThis study introduces moral sensemaking to the emergency management literature and investigates how organizational design influences it.","PeriodicalId":44087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijes-10-2021-0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeEmergency organizations allocate specific tasks to responders in an attempt to resolve increasingly complex incidents. Many studies take a pragmatic perspective by studying how emergency organizations can more effectively compartmentalize response tasks. Yet, the effects of compartmentalization on responders' sensemaking of moral issues (i.e. moral sensemaking) has received almost no attention.Design/methodology/approachBased on existing research, the authors bring together different insights on the relation between compartmentalization and emergency responders’ sensemaking of moral issues.FindingsThe authors demonstrate that emergency organizations may undermine the moral sensemaking of responders through introducing moral blind spots and moral dissociation or, instead, enable moral sensemaking through enhancing moral agency and awareness. The authors argue that emergency organizations need to induce moral sense-discrediting among responders to enhance their moral sensemaking. Finally, the authors conclude with discussing two types of compartmentalizing tasks, functional concentration and the holographic metaphor, to show that the latter is most likely to enhance moral sensemaking among emergency responders.Originality/valueThis study introduces moral sensemaking to the emergency management literature and investigates how organizational design influences it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
紧急救援人员的道德意义建构:分区化的影响
目的应急组织将特定任务分配给响应者,试图解决日益复杂的事件。许多研究从务实的角度出发,研究应急组织如何更有效地划分应对任务。然而,划分对回应者对道德问题的感知(即道德感知)的影响几乎没有得到关注。设计/方法论/方法基于现有研究,作者对划分与应急人员对道德问题的感知之间的关系提出了不同的见解。研究结果作者证明,应急组织可能通过引入道德盲点和道德分离来破坏响应者的道德感知,或者通过增强道德能动性和意识来实现道德感知。作者认为,应急组织需要在响应者中引发道德意识的质疑,以增强他们的道德意识。最后,作者讨论了两种类型的划分任务,即功能集中和全息隐喻,以表明后者最有可能增强应急人员的道德感。原创性/价值本研究将道德感知引入应急管理文献,并调查组织设计如何影响道德感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Emergency Services
International Journal of Emergency Services SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Australian paramedics following the introduction of professional regulation: a qualitative exploration Optimization of new fire department location using an improved GIS algorithm for firefighters travel time estimation The adoption of evidence-based policing: the pivotal role of first-line police leaders across England and Wales The impacts of leadership behaviours on the mental well-being of public safety communicators Towards disaster prevention in community centers: development of a code-based fire risk assessment tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1