‘New Russia’ and the Legacies of Settler Colonialism in Southern Ukraine

Olivia Irena Durand
{"title":"‘New Russia’ and the Legacies of Settler Colonialism in Southern Ukraine","authors":"Olivia Irena Durand","doi":"10.1163/25895893-bja10025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Russia’s conquest of the northern shores of the Black Sea in the late eighteenth century and their renaming as ‘New Russia’ contributed to a wider movement of colonisation, settlement, and re-signification of territories worldwide under the aegis of imperial ideology. The adoption of the new name was also a way to erase the memory of the former inhabitants of the region—in the case of Southern Ukraine, its Tatar and Cossack populations, as well as its Greek and Jewish minorities. However, the coloniality of ‘New Russia’ was always up for debate in Russian official discourse: because the conquests happened in contiguous territories, Southern Ukraine was both an object of colonisation and an agent of further conquest, especially in the direction of the Caucasus. Inventing ‘New Russia’ thus asserted the colonial and ‘oriental’ significance of the Black Sea steppes, while entrenching Russia’s own imperial status and suggesting a place where Russia’s future might be.","PeriodicalId":93113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied history","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25895893-bja10025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Russia’s conquest of the northern shores of the Black Sea in the late eighteenth century and their renaming as ‘New Russia’ contributed to a wider movement of colonisation, settlement, and re-signification of territories worldwide under the aegis of imperial ideology. The adoption of the new name was also a way to erase the memory of the former inhabitants of the region—in the case of Southern Ukraine, its Tatar and Cossack populations, as well as its Greek and Jewish minorities. However, the coloniality of ‘New Russia’ was always up for debate in Russian official discourse: because the conquests happened in contiguous territories, Southern Ukraine was both an object of colonisation and an agent of further conquest, especially in the direction of the Caucasus. Inventing ‘New Russia’ thus asserted the colonial and ‘oriental’ significance of the Black Sea steppes, while entrenching Russia’s own imperial status and suggesting a place where Russia’s future might be.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“新俄罗斯”与乌克兰南部定居者殖民主义的遗产
18世纪末,俄罗斯征服了黑海北岸,并将其更名为“新俄罗斯”,这有助于在帝国意识形态的庇护下,在全球范围内进行更广泛的殖民、定居和领土重新意义的运动。采用这个新名字也是为了抹去该地区前居民的记忆——以乌克兰南部、鞑靼人和哥萨克人以及希腊和犹太少数民族为例。然而,“新俄罗斯”的殖民主义在俄罗斯官方话语中总是备受争议:因为征服发生在毗连的领土上,乌克兰南部既是殖民的对象,也是进一步征服的代理人,尤其是在高加索地区。因此,发明“新俄罗斯”肯定了黑海大草原的殖民和“东方”意义,同时巩固了俄罗斯自己的帝国地位,并为俄罗斯的未来指明了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Clinton Administration’s Policy of Democracy Promotion in Ukraine (1993–2001) Precedents in Peacemaking Two Types of Applied History Historical Analogies Historical Events as ‘Magic Yarn Balls’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1