Standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on U.S. dairy farms

Zhengyu Lu, E. Bulut, D. Nydam, R. Ivanek
{"title":"Standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on U.S. dairy farms","authors":"Zhengyu Lu, E. Bulut, D. Nydam, R. Ivanek","doi":"10.3389/frabi.2023.1176817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global One Health threat. A portion of AMR development can be attributed to antimicrobial use (AMU) in animals, including dairy cattle. Quantifying AMU on U.S. dairy farms is necessary to inform antimicrobial stewardship strategies and help evaluate the relationship between AMU and AMR. Many AMU indicators have been proposed for quantifying AMU in dairy cattle. However, these indicators are difficult to interpret and compare because they differ in the type of data used, the calculation approach, and the definitions of variables and parameters used in the calculation. Therefore, we selected 16 indicators (count-based, mass-based, and dose-based) applicable for quantifying AMU on U.S. dairy farms. We systematized the indicators by standardizing their variables and parameters to improve their interchangeability, interpretation, and comparability. We scored indicators against six data-driven criteria (assessing their accuracy, data and effort needs, and level of privacy concern) and five stewardship-driven criteria (assessing their ability to capture trends and inform antimicrobial stewardship). The derived standardized indicators will aid farmers and veterinarians in selecting suitable indicators based on data availability and stewardship needs on a farm. The comparison of indicators revealed a trade-off requiring farmers to balance the granularity of data necessary for an accurate indicator and effort to collect the data, and a trade-off relevant to farmers interested in data sharing to inform stewardship because more accurate indicators are typically based on more sensitive information. Indicators with better accuracy tended to score better in stewardship criteria. Overall, two dose-based indicators, estimating the number of treatments and administered doses, scored best in accuracy and stewardship. Conversely, two count-based indicators, estimating the length of AMU, and a mass-based indicator, estimating the mass of administered antimicrobials, performed best in the effort and privacy criteria. These findings are expected to benefit One Health by aiding the uptake of farm-level AMU indicators by U.S. dairy farms.","PeriodicalId":73065,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in antibiotics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frabi.2023.1176817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global One Health threat. A portion of AMR development can be attributed to antimicrobial use (AMU) in animals, including dairy cattle. Quantifying AMU on U.S. dairy farms is necessary to inform antimicrobial stewardship strategies and help evaluate the relationship between AMU and AMR. Many AMU indicators have been proposed for quantifying AMU in dairy cattle. However, these indicators are difficult to interpret and compare because they differ in the type of data used, the calculation approach, and the definitions of variables and parameters used in the calculation. Therefore, we selected 16 indicators (count-based, mass-based, and dose-based) applicable for quantifying AMU on U.S. dairy farms. We systematized the indicators by standardizing their variables and parameters to improve their interchangeability, interpretation, and comparability. We scored indicators against six data-driven criteria (assessing their accuracy, data and effort needs, and level of privacy concern) and five stewardship-driven criteria (assessing their ability to capture trends and inform antimicrobial stewardship). The derived standardized indicators will aid farmers and veterinarians in selecting suitable indicators based on data availability and stewardship needs on a farm. The comparison of indicators revealed a trade-off requiring farmers to balance the granularity of data necessary for an accurate indicator and effort to collect the data, and a trade-off relevant to farmers interested in data sharing to inform stewardship because more accurate indicators are typically based on more sensitive information. Indicators with better accuracy tended to score better in stewardship criteria. Overall, two dose-based indicators, estimating the number of treatments and administered doses, scored best in accuracy and stewardship. Conversely, two count-based indicators, estimating the length of AMU, and a mass-based indicator, estimating the mass of administered antimicrobials, performed best in the effort and privacy criteria. These findings are expected to benefit One Health by aiding the uptake of farm-level AMU indicators by U.S. dairy farms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国奶牛场抗菌药物使用量化指标的标准化和评估
抗微生物耐药性(AMR)是全球“一个健康”的威胁。AMR的发展部分可归因于动物(包括奶牛)的抗菌药物使用(AMU)。量化美国奶牛场的AMU对于制定抗菌管理策略和帮助评估AMU和AMR之间的关系是必要的。已经提出了许多AMU指标来量化奶牛中的AMU。然而,这些指标很难解释和比较,因为它们在使用的数据类型、计算方法以及计算中使用的变量和参数的定义方面有所不同。因此,我们选择了16个指标(基于计数、基于质量和基于剂量),适用于量化美国奶牛场的AMU。我们通过标准化指标的变量和参数,使其系统化,以提高其互换性、解释性和可比性。我们根据六个数据驱动的标准(评估其准确性、数据和工作需求以及隐私关注程度)和五个管理驱动的标准,对指标进行了评分(评估其捕捉趋势和告知抗菌管理的能力)。衍生出的标准化指标将帮助农民和兽医根据数据可用性和农场管理需求选择合适的指标。指标的比较揭示了一种权衡,要求农民平衡准确指标所需的数据粒度和收集数据的努力,以及与有兴趣共享数据以告知管理的农民相关的权衡,因为更准确的指标通常基于更敏感的信息。准确度较高的指标往往在管理标准中得分较高。总的来说,两个基于剂量的指标,估计治疗次数和给药剂量,在准确性和管理方面得分最高。相反,两个基于计数的指标(估计AMU的长度)和一个基于质量的指标(评估给药的抗菌药物的质量)在努力和隐私标准方面表现最好。这些发现有望通过帮助美国奶牛场吸收农场级AMU指标,使One Health受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates from adult and paediatric patients in Jordan: Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) 2010–2021 Editorial: Antibiotics in engineered and natural environments: occurrence, fate, kinetic and microbial impact Increased usage of doxycycline for young children with Lyme disease Unguarded liabilities: Borrelia burgdorferi’s complex amino acid dependence exposes unique avenues of inhibition Antibiogram profiles of pathogenic and commensal bacteria in goat and sheep feces on smallholder farm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1