The and Alternation in the History of English

IF 1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS American Speech Pub Date : 2020-09-17 DOI:10.1215/00031283-8661851
P. Grund, Matti Peikola, Johanna Rastas, Wen Xin
{"title":"The and Alternation in the History of English","authors":"P. Grund, Matti Peikola, Johanna Rastas, Wen Xin","doi":"10.1215/00031283-8661851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Early Modern English period (roughly 1500s–1700s), the use of the letters <u> and <v> went through a change from a positionally constrained system (i.e., initial <v>, medial <u>) to a system based on phonetic value, with <u> marking vowels and <v> consonants. The exact dynamics of this transition have received little attention, however, and the standard account is exclusively based on printed sources. Using a data set of 3,801 examples from 107 handwritten legal documents from the witch trials in Salem, Massachusetts, in 1692 and 1693, this study indicates that the current narrative is oversimplified and that behind the transition from one system to another lies a complex process of experimentation and variation. The study charts the <u> and <v> usage in the handwriting of nineteen recorders who subscribe to various “mixed” systems that conform neither to the positional nor the phonetic system. In addition to the positional and phonetic constraints, a range of other linguistic and extralinguistic factors appears to have influenced the recorders’ alternation between <u> and <v>, from lexical item and graphotactics to textual history.","PeriodicalId":46508,"journal":{"name":"American Speech","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Speech","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-8661851","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the Early Modern English period (roughly 1500s–1700s), the use of the letters and went through a change from a positionally constrained system (i.e., initial , medial ) to a system based on phonetic value, with marking vowels and consonants. The exact dynamics of this transition have received little attention, however, and the standard account is exclusively based on printed sources. Using a data set of 3,801 examples from 107 handwritten legal documents from the witch trials in Salem, Massachusetts, in 1692 and 1693, this study indicates that the current narrative is oversimplified and that behind the transition from one system to another lies a complex process of experimentation and variation. The study charts the and usage in the handwriting of nineteen recorders who subscribe to various “mixed” systems that conform neither to the positional nor the phonetic system. In addition to the positional and phonetic constraints, a range of other linguistic and extralinguistic factors appears to have influenced the recorders’ alternation between and , from lexical item and graphotactics to textual history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语史上的变化
在现代英语早期(大约1500年代至1700年代),字母和的使用经历了从位置约束系统(即声母、中间)到基于语音值的系统的变化,标记元音和辅音。然而,这种转变的确切动态很少受到关注,标准账户完全基于印刷资料。这项研究使用了1692年和1693年马萨诸塞州塞勒姆的107份手写法律文件中的3801个例子的数据集,表明目前的叙述过于简单,从一个系统到另一个系统的转变背后是一个复杂的实验和变化过程。这项研究记录了19名记录者的笔迹和用法,他们使用了各种既不符合位置系统也不符合语音系统的“混合”系统。除了位置和语音的限制外,从词汇项目和象形文字到文本历史,一系列其他语言和语言外因素似乎也影响了记录者在和之间的交替。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Speech
American Speech Multiple-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: American Speech has been one of the foremost publications in its field since its founding in 1925. The journal is concerned principally with the English language in the Western Hemisphere, although articles dealing with English in other parts of the world, the influence of other languages by or on English, and linguistic theory are also published. The journal is not committed to any particular theoretical framework, and issues often contain contributions that appeal to a readership wider than the linguistic studies community. Regular features include a book review section and a “Miscellany” section devoted to brief essays and notes.
期刊最新文献
Race, place, and education: Charting the wine-whine merger in the US South Laughing at Ourselves: Professor Schnitzel and Pennsylvania German Humor What Goes Around: Language Change and Glottalization in Vermont You ain’t from here, are you?: Subregional Variation and Identification in the New Appalachia Acoustic cues and obstruent devoicing in Minnesotan English
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1