The role of cognitive change in desistance from crime: do cognitive-behavioral programs spark cognitive change and desistance?

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Crime & Justice Pub Date : 2021-05-11 DOI:10.1080/0735648X.2021.1921611
Kristin Rose
{"title":"The role of cognitive change in desistance from crime: do cognitive-behavioral programs spark cognitive change and desistance?","authors":"Kristin Rose","doi":"10.1080/0735648X.2021.1921611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Considerable research has been conducted to understand the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral programs in reducing recidivism. This is a result of continued interest in understanding ‘what works’ in correctional programs. However, there has been comparatively little focus devoted to understanding how or why these programs may be effective. Theories of crime that examine desistance in terms of cognitive change may be particularly helpful in providing context to the discussion of how and why cognitive-behavioral programs work in reducing recidivism. Using propensity score matching and multiple mediation analysis, this study examined the effect of participation in cognitive-behavioral programming on recidivism through three measures of cognitive change: self-efficacy, perceptions of deviance, and motivation to change one’s behavior. Data collected as part of the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (SVORI) was used for these analyses.","PeriodicalId":46770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crime & Justice","volume":"45 1","pages":"152 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0735648X.2021.1921611","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crime & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2021.1921611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Considerable research has been conducted to understand the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral programs in reducing recidivism. This is a result of continued interest in understanding ‘what works’ in correctional programs. However, there has been comparatively little focus devoted to understanding how or why these programs may be effective. Theories of crime that examine desistance in terms of cognitive change may be particularly helpful in providing context to the discussion of how and why cognitive-behavioral programs work in reducing recidivism. Using propensity score matching and multiple mediation analysis, this study examined the effect of participation in cognitive-behavioral programming on recidivism through three measures of cognitive change: self-efficacy, perceptions of deviance, and motivation to change one’s behavior. Data collected as part of the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (SVORI) was used for these analyses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知变化在戒除犯罪中的作用:认知行为项目是否激发了认知变化和戒除?
为了了解认知行为项目在减少再犯方面的有效性,已经进行了大量的研究。这是对理解惩教项目中“什么有效”的持续兴趣的结果。然而,相对而言,很少有人专注于理解这些计划如何或为什么有效。从认知变化的角度来研究戒酒的犯罪理论,可能特别有助于为讨论认知行为项目如何以及为什么能减少再犯提供背景。本研究采用倾向得分匹配和多重中介分析,通过自我效能感、越轨知觉和行为改变动机三个认知改变指标,考察了参与认知行为规划对再犯的影响。作为严重暴力罪犯再入倡议(SVORI)的一部分收集的数据用于这些分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Crime & Justice
Journal of Crime & Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Does type of counsel matter? A Comparison of outcomes in cases involving retained- and assigned counsel An empirical analysis of the (Un)readability of inmate handbooks Opioid misuse and legislative responses in U.S. states: politics and lawmaking to address a public health crisis The impact of professional orientations on officers’ supervision behaviors in juvenile and adult community corrections: a multi-agency analysis Examining risk and risk perception on LSD and MDMA in online marketplaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1