ESR Dating of Optically Bleached Quartz Grains: Assessing the Impact of Different Experimental Setups on Dose Evaluations

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences Geochronometria Pub Date : 2020-07-18 DOI:10.2478/geochr-2020-0005
V. Guilarte, M. Duval
{"title":"ESR Dating of Optically Bleached Quartz Grains: Assessing the Impact of Different Experimental Setups on Dose Evaluations","authors":"V. Guilarte, M. Duval","doi":"10.2478/geochr-2020-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, our investigation has been centred on improving the reliability and accuracy of the ESR method applied to quartz grains. As part of this ongoing investigation, we present an intra-laboratory study to evaluate the impact of different experimental setups on the ESR measurement precision and dose evaluation for ESR dating of optically bleached quartz grains. Repeated measurements of quartz samples have been performed at CENIEH, Spain, using two different Bruker spectrometers (EMXmicro and Elexsys E500) and resonators (standard rectangular ER4102ST and cylindrical Super High QE cavities). Their performance in terms of sensitivity, measurement repeatability and dose determination are presented in this study. This intra-laboratory work has allowed to evaluate the robustness of our protocol for ESR dating of quartz grains and to study the potential impact of different experimental setups on dose evaluation, which is essential for future standardization of the ESR dating method. Our results indicate that all the different experimental setups provide comparable precision of the ESR intensity measurements. Moreover, all the ESR dose estimates are within 1-sigma error, suggesting that it is possible to compare results obtained by different laboratories when similar analytical procedures are followed. Finally, the higher sensitivity achieved by the SHQE resonator appears to be of particular interest when dealing with samples showing low ESR signal intensities.","PeriodicalId":50421,"journal":{"name":"Geochronometria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronometria","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/geochr-2020-0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, our investigation has been centred on improving the reliability and accuracy of the ESR method applied to quartz grains. As part of this ongoing investigation, we present an intra-laboratory study to evaluate the impact of different experimental setups on the ESR measurement precision and dose evaluation for ESR dating of optically bleached quartz grains. Repeated measurements of quartz samples have been performed at CENIEH, Spain, using two different Bruker spectrometers (EMXmicro and Elexsys E500) and resonators (standard rectangular ER4102ST and cylindrical Super High QE cavities). Their performance in terms of sensitivity, measurement repeatability and dose determination are presented in this study. This intra-laboratory work has allowed to evaluate the robustness of our protocol for ESR dating of quartz grains and to study the potential impact of different experimental setups on dose evaluation, which is essential for future standardization of the ESR dating method. Our results indicate that all the different experimental setups provide comparable precision of the ESR intensity measurements. Moreover, all the ESR dose estimates are within 1-sigma error, suggesting that it is possible to compare results obtained by different laboratories when similar analytical procedures are followed. Finally, the higher sensitivity achieved by the SHQE resonator appears to be of particular interest when dealing with samples showing low ESR signal intensities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光学漂白石英颗粒的ESR定年:评估不同实验设置对剂量评估的影响
摘要近年来,我们的研究重点是提高应用于石英晶粒的ESR方法的可靠性和准确性。作为这项正在进行的研究的一部分,我们提出了一项实验室内研究,以评估不同实验装置对光学漂白石英颗粒ESR测年的ESR测量精度和剂量评估的影响。在西班牙CENIEH,使用两种不同的Bruker光谱仪(EMXmicro和Elexsys E500)和谐振器(标准矩形ER4102ST和圆柱形超高QE腔)对石英样品进行了重复测量。本研究介绍了它们在灵敏度、测量重复性和剂量测定方面的性能。这项实验室内的工作使我们能够评估石英颗粒ESR测年方案的稳健性,并研究不同实验设置对剂量评估的潜在影响,这对ESR定年方法的未来标准化至关重要。我们的结果表明,所有不同的实验装置都提供了相当精度的ESR强度测量。此外,所有ESR剂量估计值都在1西格玛误差范围内,这表明当遵循类似的分析程序时,可以比较不同实验室获得的结果。最后,当处理显示低ESR信号强度的样品时,SHQE谐振器实现的更高灵敏度似乎特别令人感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geochronometria
Geochronometria 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geochronometria is aimed at integrating scientists developing different methods of absolute chronology and using them in different fields of earth and other natural sciences and archaeology. The methods in use are e.g. radiocarbon, stable isotopes, isotopes of natural decay series, optically stimulated luminescence, thermoluminescence, EPR/ESR, dendrochronology, varve chronology. The journal publishes papers that are devoted to developing the dating methods as well as studies concentrating on their applications in geology, palaeoclimatology, palaeobiology, palaeohydrology, geocgraphy and archaeology etc.
期刊最新文献
Radiocarbon Dated Pulse and Cereal Crops Indicate Diachronic Use of Iron Age Extreme Upland Sites in the Western Carpathians, Slovakia Evaluating the Effect of Hydrofluoric Acid Etching on Quartz Grains using Microscope Image Analysis, Laser Diffraction and Weight Loss Particle Size Estimate The Internal Dose Rate in Quartz Grains: Experimental Data and Consequences for Luminescence Dating Chronology of the Huxushan Paleolithic site in south China: Inferred from multiple luminescence dating techniques Multi-method luminescence dating of old fluvial sediments from northern Tian Shan, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1