Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: A WTO Perspective

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Trade and Customs Journal Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.54648/gtcj2022060
Yuliia Kucheriava
{"title":"Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: A WTO Perspective","authors":"Yuliia Kucheriava","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Times of emergency in international relations are, indeed, a true test, not just for individuals but also for legal frameworks, including the one of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). This article aims to assess the ability of the WTO legal framework to address challenges that have arisen due to the Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. This is done through a two-pronged approach covering: (1) a general assessment of provisions of the relevant WTO Agreements and their role for addressing the current conflict in Ukraine; (2) an assessment of potential limitations to the system that may preclude effective response to the conflict. The article demonstrates that despite the fact that WTO Agreements do not provide for specific set of rights and obligations to regulate trade in times of war, they contain various mechanisms that help to ‘keep finger on the pulse’ to maintain order on the international trade arena. This is done, inter alia, via the various exemptions and exceptions WTO Members may resort to in times of extraordinary events. It further argues that despite its potential limitations, WTO law provides for a whole range of instruments to dissuade or ward off actions like the unpreceded invasion of Ukraine.\nWTO, war or other emergency in international relations, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, GATT 1994, GATS, MFN, customs duties, quantitative restrictions, trade facilitation, expulsion","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Times of emergency in international relations are, indeed, a true test, not just for individuals but also for legal frameworks, including the one of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). This article aims to assess the ability of the WTO legal framework to address challenges that have arisen due to the Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. This is done through a two-pronged approach covering: (1) a general assessment of provisions of the relevant WTO Agreements and their role for addressing the current conflict in Ukraine; (2) an assessment of potential limitations to the system that may preclude effective response to the conflict. The article demonstrates that despite the fact that WTO Agreements do not provide for specific set of rights and obligations to regulate trade in times of war, they contain various mechanisms that help to ‘keep finger on the pulse’ to maintain order on the international trade arena. This is done, inter alia, via the various exemptions and exceptions WTO Members may resort to in times of extraordinary events. It further argues that despite its potential limitations, WTO law provides for a whole range of instruments to dissuade or ward off actions like the unpreceded invasion of Ukraine. WTO, war or other emergency in international relations, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, GATT 1994, GATS, MFN, customs duties, quantitative restrictions, trade facilitation, expulsion
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯入侵乌克兰:WTO视角
事实上,国际关系的紧急时刻不仅对个人,而且对包括世界贸易组织(WTO)在内的法律框架都是一次真正的考验。本文旨在评估世贸组织法律框架应对俄罗斯入侵乌克兰带来的挑战的能力。这是通过双管齐下的方法来实现的,包括:(1)对世贸组织相关协议的条款及其在解决乌克兰当前冲突方面的作用进行总体评估;(2) 对可能妨碍有效应对冲突的系统潜在局限性的评估。这篇文章表明,尽管世贸组织协议没有规定在战争时期监管贸易的一套具体权利和义务,但它们包含了各种机制,有助于“密切关注”国际贸易领域的秩序。除其他外,这是通过世贸组织成员在发生特殊事件时可以诉诸的各种豁免和例外来实现的。它进一步辩称,尽管存在潜在的局限性,但世贸组织法律规定了一系列文书来劝阻或阻止诸如对乌克兰的不可放弃的入侵、战争或国际关系中的其他紧急情况、俄罗斯入侵乌克兰、GATT1994、GATS、最惠国待遇、关税、数量限制、贸易便利化、驱逐等行动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Analysis Of The Foreign Subsidies Regulation From An International Trade Law Perspective On Trade In Goods Robotics Process Automation (RPA) And The Import/Export Customs Declaration Process Tackling Cross-Border Subsidies in the EU: The Need to Build on a Promising Start Part 1 The Foreign Subsidies Regulation of the European Union: A New Instrument Levelling the Playing Field? Digitalization in Global Trade: Opportunities and Challenges for Investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1