Radiograph’s Reject Rate Among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Dental Undergraduates And Its Implications

Azizah Ahmad Fauzi, C. Ng, L. L. Wong, S. Ho, A. Ashar
{"title":"Radiograph’s Reject Rate Among Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Dental Undergraduates And Its Implications","authors":"Azizah Ahmad Fauzi, C. Ng, L. L. Wong, S. Ho, A. Ashar","doi":"10.17576/JSKM-2021-1902-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate the reject rate of periapical and bitewing radiographs among dental undergraduate students of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), identify the type of radiographic errors which are frequently encountered and compare reject rates between Year 3, Year 4 and Year 5 dental undergraduates.  118 rejected periapical radiographs and 27 rejected bitewing radiographs were collected from the UKM dental undergraduates’ polyclinics for a duration of 10 months. These rejected radiographs were further evaluated to determine the type of radiographic error. A spiking increase in periapical radiographs reject rate from Year 3 (4%) to Year 4 (11%) was observed. This finding was consistent with the statistically significant difference in the periapical radiographs reject rates for Year 3 and Year 4 ( p = 0.0475). In periapical radiographs, the most frequently committed radiographic error was apical cut, followed by high density film. Vice versa, high density film was accounted as the most common radiographic error in bitewing radiography. Analysis of periapical and bitewing radiographs’ reject rates among UKM dental undergraduate entails the necessity to supervise undergraduate students regardless of the year of their undergraduate training in all aspects of the radiographic procedures which include positioning radiographic armamentarium, the setting of radiographic exposure time and the film processing procedure. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JSKM-2021-1902-08","PeriodicalId":17686,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/JSKM-2021-1902-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reject rate of periapical and bitewing radiographs among dental undergraduate students of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), identify the type of radiographic errors which are frequently encountered and compare reject rates between Year 3, Year 4 and Year 5 dental undergraduates.  118 rejected periapical radiographs and 27 rejected bitewing radiographs were collected from the UKM dental undergraduates’ polyclinics for a duration of 10 months. These rejected radiographs were further evaluated to determine the type of radiographic error. A spiking increase in periapical radiographs reject rate from Year 3 (4%) to Year 4 (11%) was observed. This finding was consistent with the statistically significant difference in the periapical radiographs reject rates for Year 3 and Year 4 ( p = 0.0475). In periapical radiographs, the most frequently committed radiographic error was apical cut, followed by high density film. Vice versa, high density film was accounted as the most common radiographic error in bitewing radiography. Analysis of periapical and bitewing radiographs’ reject rates among UKM dental undergraduate entails the necessity to supervise undergraduate students regardless of the year of their undergraduate training in all aspects of the radiographic procedures which include positioning radiographic armamentarium, the setting of radiographic exposure time and the film processing procedure. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JSKM-2021-1902-08
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚Kebangsaan大学牙科本科生的x光片拒绝率及其影响
本研究的目的是评估马来西亚Kebangsaan大学(UKM)牙科本科生的根尖周和咬牙x光片的拒绝率,确定经常遇到的x光片错误类型,并比较三年级,四年级和五年级牙科本科生的拒绝率。在为期10个月的时间里,从UKM牙科本科生综合诊所收集了118张拒绝的根尖周x片和27张拒绝的咬翼x片。对这些被拒绝的x光片进行进一步评估,以确定射线照相误差的类型。从第3年(4%)到第4年(11%),尖周x线片拒绝率急剧上升。这一发现与第3年和第4年根尖周x线片拒绝率的统计学差异一致(p = 0.0475)。在根尖周围x线片中,最常见的放射错误是根尖切割,其次是高密度片。反之亦然,高密度胶片被认为是咬翼摄影中最常见的射线摄影误差。分析UKM牙科本科学生的根尖周和咬牙x光片的不治率,需要对本科生进行监督,无论他们的本科培训是哪一年,包括放射照相设备的定位,放射照相曝光时间的设置和胶片处理程序。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JSKM-2021-1902-08
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Jujube in Malay Medical Manuscript: A comparison from Scientific and Islamic Perspectives Impact of a Tailored Self-Management Education Programme for Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis in a Multi-Ethnic Country THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE INTENSITY OF INSTAGRAM USAGE AND ORTHOREXIA NERVOSA IN UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA STUDENTS The electroacoustic performance of digital noise reduction systems in commercial hearing aids with Malay speech-plus-noise test signals THE BENEFIT OF GARLIC FROM ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE AND MALAY PRACTISE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1