Spatial, temporal, and social dynamics in visitation to U.S. national parks: A big data approach

IF 6.9 2区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Tourism Management Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101143
Junyu Lu , Xiao Huang , John A. Kupfer , Xiao Xiao , Zhenlong Li , Hanxue Wei , Sicheng Wang , Liao Zhu
{"title":"Spatial, temporal, and social dynamics in visitation to U.S. national parks: A big data approach","authors":"Junyu Lu ,&nbsp;Xiao Huang ,&nbsp;John A. Kupfer ,&nbsp;Xiao Xiao ,&nbsp;Zhenlong Li ,&nbsp;Hanxue Wei ,&nbsp;Sicheng Wang ,&nbsp;Liao Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The degree to which many benefits of national parks are realized hinges on public access. Traditional methods in estimating park visitation can be time-consuming, costly, and labor-intensive. Fortunately, the growing availability of ‘big data’ offers new opportunities for rapid and large-scale estimation. This study investigated the spatiotemporal dynamics in visitation to all National Park Service (NPS) units in the contiguous U.S. and explored associated sociodemographic factors using fine-grained SafeGraph mobile device location data. We found that people tend to travel less frequently and in a shorter distance to visit NPS units in both 2020 and 2021 vs. 2019. During the pandemic, people preferred visiting national parks and nature-based NPS units over culture-oriented ones relative to pre-pandemic levels. Most importantly, this study highlights a long-standing social inequity – the groups of minorities (i.e., Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics) and lower-income were less likely to visit NPS units than Whites and higher-income, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48141,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Management Perspectives","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 101143"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Management Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211973623000715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The degree to which many benefits of national parks are realized hinges on public access. Traditional methods in estimating park visitation can be time-consuming, costly, and labor-intensive. Fortunately, the growing availability of ‘big data’ offers new opportunities for rapid and large-scale estimation. This study investigated the spatiotemporal dynamics in visitation to all National Park Service (NPS) units in the contiguous U.S. and explored associated sociodemographic factors using fine-grained SafeGraph mobile device location data. We found that people tend to travel less frequently and in a shorter distance to visit NPS units in both 2020 and 2021 vs. 2019. During the pandemic, people preferred visiting national parks and nature-based NPS units over culture-oriented ones relative to pre-pandemic levels. Most importantly, this study highlights a long-standing social inequity – the groups of minorities (i.e., Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics) and lower-income were less likely to visit NPS units than Whites and higher-income, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
访问美国国家公园的空间、时间和社会动态:一个大数据方法
国家公园的许多好处实现的程度取决于公众的进入。传统的估算公园访问量的方法既费时又费钱,而且需要大量的劳动。幸运的是,越来越多的“大数据”的可用性为快速和大规模的评估提供了新的机会。本研究调查了美国所有国家公园管理局(NPS)单位的访问时空动态,并利用细粒度的SafeGraph移动设备位置数据探讨了相关的社会人口因素。我们发现,与2019年相比,2020年和2021年人们去NPS单位的旅行频率和距离都更短。在疫情期间,相对于疫情前的水平,人们更喜欢参观国家公园和以自然为基础的NPS单位,而不是以文化为导向的单位。最重要的是,这项研究强调了长期存在的社会不平等——少数群体(即黑人、亚洲人和西班牙裔)和低收入群体分别比白人和高收入群体更不可能访问NPS单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
99
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Tourism Management Perspectives is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on the planning and management of travel and tourism. It covers topics such as tourist experiences, their consequences for communities, economies, and environments, the creation of image, the shaping of tourist experiences and perceptions, and the management of tourist organizations and destinations. The journal's editorial board consists of experienced international professionals and it shares the board with Tourism Management. The journal covers socio-cultural, technological, planning, and policy aspects of international, national, and regional tourism, as well as specific management studies. It encourages papers that introduce new research methods and critique existing ones in the context of tourism research. The journal publishes empirical research articles and high-quality review articles on important topics and emerging themes that enhance the theoretical and conceptual understanding of key areas within travel and tourism management.
期刊最新文献
Designing for Co-created, memorable experiences in sustainable wine tourism: The moderating roles of eco-certification confusion and offering type Editorial Board Can generative artificial intelligence enhance brand performance in tourism? A mixed-methods study integrating service-dominant logic, social exchange theory, and uncanny valley theory Critiquing halal tourism: Power, piety, and the politics of gaze Perceived realism, place attachment, and residents' support and involvement: Towards resident-centric film tourism development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1