Analysis of Factors Associated with Highway Personal Car and Truck Run-Off-Road Crashes: Decision Tree and Mixed Logit Model with Heterogeneity in Means and Variances Approaches

IF 3.4 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Informatics Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.3390/informatics10030066
Thanapong Champahom, Panuwat Wisutwattanasak, Chamroeun Se, Chinnakrit Banyong, Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao, V. Ratanavaraha
{"title":"Analysis of Factors Associated with Highway Personal Car and Truck Run-Off-Road Crashes: Decision Tree and Mixed Logit Model with Heterogeneity in Means and Variances Approaches","authors":"Thanapong Champahom, Panuwat Wisutwattanasak, Chamroeun Se, Chinnakrit Banyong, Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao, V. Ratanavaraha","doi":"10.3390/informatics10030066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among several approaches to analyzing crash research, the use of machine learning and econometric analysis has found potential in the analysis. This study aims to empirically examine factors influencing the single-vehicle crash for personal cars and trucks using decision trees (DT) and mixed binary logit with heterogeneity in means and variances (RPBLHMV) and compare model accuracy. The data in this study were obtained from the Department of Highway during 2011–2017, and the results indicated that the RPBLHMV was superior due to its higher overall prediction accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values when compared to the DT model. According to the RPBLHMV results, car models showed that injury severity was associated with driver gender, seat belt, mount the island, defect equipment, and safety equipment. For the truck model, it was found that crashes located at intersections or medians, mounts on the island, and safety equipment have a significant influence on injury severity. DT results also showed that running off-road and hitting safety equipment can reduce the risk of death for car and truck drivers. This finding can illustrate the difference causing the dependent variable in each model. The RPBLHMV showed the ability to capture random parameters and unobserved heterogeneity. But DT can be easily used to provide variable importance and show which factor has the most significance by sequencing. Each model has advantages and disadvantages. The study findings can give relevant authorities choices for measures and policy improvement based on two analysis methods in accordance with their policy design. Therefore, whether advocating road safety or improving policy measures, the use of appropriate methods can increase operational efficiency.","PeriodicalId":37100,"journal":{"name":"Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10030066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among several approaches to analyzing crash research, the use of machine learning and econometric analysis has found potential in the analysis. This study aims to empirically examine factors influencing the single-vehicle crash for personal cars and trucks using decision trees (DT) and mixed binary logit with heterogeneity in means and variances (RPBLHMV) and compare model accuracy. The data in this study were obtained from the Department of Highway during 2011–2017, and the results indicated that the RPBLHMV was superior due to its higher overall prediction accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values when compared to the DT model. According to the RPBLHMV results, car models showed that injury severity was associated with driver gender, seat belt, mount the island, defect equipment, and safety equipment. For the truck model, it was found that crashes located at intersections or medians, mounts on the island, and safety equipment have a significant influence on injury severity. DT results also showed that running off-road and hitting safety equipment can reduce the risk of death for car and truck drivers. This finding can illustrate the difference causing the dependent variable in each model. The RPBLHMV showed the ability to capture random parameters and unobserved heterogeneity. But DT can be easily used to provide variable importance and show which factor has the most significance by sequencing. Each model has advantages and disadvantages. The study findings can give relevant authorities choices for measures and policy improvement based on two analysis methods in accordance with their policy design. Therefore, whether advocating road safety or improving policy measures, the use of appropriate methods can increase operational efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公路个人汽车和卡车越野车碰撞相关因素分析:均值和方差异质性的决策树和混合Logit模型
在分析碰撞研究的几种方法中,机器学习和计量经济学分析的使用在分析中发现了潜力。本研究旨在使用决策树(DT)和均值方差异质性的混合二元logit(RPBLHMV)实证检验影响个人汽车和卡车单车碰撞的因素,并比较模型的准确性。本研究中的数据来自公路部2011-2017年,结果表明,与DT模型相比,RPBLHMV具有更高的整体预测准确性、敏感性和特异性,因此具有优越性。根据RPBLHMV的结果,汽车模型显示,损伤严重程度与驾驶员性别、安全带、安装岛、缺陷设备和安全设备有关。对于卡车模型,发现位于十字路口或中央分隔带、岛上支架和安全设备的碰撞对伤害严重程度有重大影响。DT结果还表明,越野行驶和碰撞安全设备可以降低汽车和卡车司机的死亡风险。这一发现可以说明导致每个模型中因变量的差异。RPBLHMV显示出捕获随机参数和未观察到的异质性的能力。但DT可以很容易地用于提供变量重要性,并通过测序显示哪个因素最重要。每种模式都有优点和缺点。研究结果可以根据相关部门的政策设计,基于两种分析方法,为相关部门提供措施和政策改进的选择。因此,无论是倡导道路安全还是改进政策措施,使用适当的方法都可以提高运营效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Informatics
Informatics Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Simulation of discrete control systems with parallelism of behavior Formal description model and conditions for detecting linked coupling faults of the memory devices A model of homographs automatic identification for the Belarusian language Ontological analysis in the problems of container applications threat modelling Closed Gordon – Newell network with single-line poles and exponentially limited request waiting time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1