INECO Frontal Screening (IFS): una herramienta psicométrica para evaluar la disfunción ejecutiva en policonsumidores

Q3 Psychology Suma Psicologica Pub Date : 2019-12-20 DOI:10.14349/sumapsi.2019.v26.n2.8
M. Z. Zabala, Lucila Cárdenas Niño, Jorge Mauricio Cuartas Arias
{"title":"INECO Frontal Screening (IFS): una herramienta psicométrica para evaluar la disfunción ejecutiva en policonsumidores","authors":"M. Z. Zabala, Lucila Cárdenas Niño, Jorge Mauricio Cuartas Arias","doi":"10.14349/sumapsi.2019.v26.n2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed the psychometric properties of the INECO Frontal Screening, IFS, in a population of polyconsumers of the city of Medellin, Colombia. The Psychometric analysis showed an acceptable consistency of the test: 0.7; with respect to its diagnostic utility, a cutoff point of 22.5 was estimated with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 91%. As to its validity, evidence of criterion validity was found when comparing cognitive performance between the case and control group, obtaining significant differences: p <0.05, in each scale and total score. Finally, construct validity was performed through exploratory factor analysis, and the total variance explained of the 56% test was found, suggesting three factors, which contribute to the effectiveness of the IFS test to identify cognitive deficits in people with some type of neurological and neuropsychological dysfunction.","PeriodicalId":38992,"journal":{"name":"Suma Psicologica","volume":"26 1","pages":"119-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suma Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2019.v26.n2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study analyzed the psychometric properties of the INECO Frontal Screening, IFS, in a population of polyconsumers of the city of Medellin, Colombia. The Psychometric analysis showed an acceptable consistency of the test: 0.7; with respect to its diagnostic utility, a cutoff point of 22.5 was estimated with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 91%. As to its validity, evidence of criterion validity was found when comparing cognitive performance between the case and control group, obtaining significant differences: p <0.05, in each scale and total score. Finally, construct validity was performed through exploratory factor analysis, and the total variance explained of the 56% test was found, suggesting three factors, which contribute to the effectiveness of the IFS test to identify cognitive deficits in people with some type of neurological and neuropsychological dysfunction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INECO额叶筛查(IFS):评估多使用者执行功能障碍的心理测量工具
本研究分析了哥伦比亚麦德林市多消费者人群中INECO正面筛查(IFS)的心理测量特性。心理测量分析显示测试的一致性可接受:0.7;就其诊断效用而言,估计截断点为22.5,敏感性为80%,特异性为91%。效度方面,病例组与对照组的认知表现比较发现效度证据,各量表及总分均有显著差异,p <0.05。最后,通过探索性因子分析对结构效度进行检验,发现了56%检验解释的总方差,表明IFS检验在识别某些类型的神经和神经心理功能障碍患者的认知缺陷方面的有效性有三个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suma Psicologica
Suma Psicologica Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Escala de Percepción de Reforzamiento Medioambiental (EROS): evidencias de validez en una muestra colombiana Changes in food habits and food-related satisfaction before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in dual-earner families with adolescents Resiliencia y violencia en el noviazgo: un estudio explicativopredictivo e instrumental con adolescentes colombianos Minding the gap: The moderating role of education between subjective health and social life perception and Internet use time Valoración de prácticas sociales que hacen uso de especies animales no humanas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1