Students as Consumers: Retaining Engineering Students by Designing Learner-Centric Courses of Value

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Continuing Higher Education Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI:10.1080/07377363.2020.1786342
J. Chernosky, J. Ausburn, R. Curtis
{"title":"Students as Consumers: Retaining Engineering Students by Designing Learner-Centric Courses of Value","authors":"J. Chernosky, J. Ausburn, R. Curtis","doi":"10.1080/07377363.2020.1786342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The global economy’s dependency upon engineers is exacerbated by a lack of qualified engineers. Most engineering students fail to complete the credential. According to the American Society for Engineering Education (2018), the high dropout rate has been correlated to satisfaction with the learning experience. Investigation of an international accelerated blended distance program designed for adult learners at a large southwestern university requiring a redesign of courses was selected for this study. The researchers wanted to identify the key components of satisfaction and student engagement, then develop an equitable instructional design model. The mixed-methods study utilized the three elements of the Community of Inquiry as the theoretical lens. The study attempted to identify the key course characteristics which could increase satisfaction and reduce dropout rates. Design components, grades, and satisfaction rates were studied. Performance data (grades) were examined and indicated no significant correlation between grades and satisfaction. Six suggested areas for enhancement were faculty interaction, authenticity, student-to-student engagement, feedback, multimedia, and homework. Through an evaluation of the quality of the courses and satisfaction, design standards could be established, resulting in quality-of-life enhancement.","PeriodicalId":44549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07377363.2020.1786342","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1786342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The global economy’s dependency upon engineers is exacerbated by a lack of qualified engineers. Most engineering students fail to complete the credential. According to the American Society for Engineering Education (2018), the high dropout rate has been correlated to satisfaction with the learning experience. Investigation of an international accelerated blended distance program designed for adult learners at a large southwestern university requiring a redesign of courses was selected for this study. The researchers wanted to identify the key components of satisfaction and student engagement, then develop an equitable instructional design model. The mixed-methods study utilized the three elements of the Community of Inquiry as the theoretical lens. The study attempted to identify the key course characteristics which could increase satisfaction and reduce dropout rates. Design components, grades, and satisfaction rates were studied. Performance data (grades) were examined and indicated no significant correlation between grades and satisfaction. Six suggested areas for enhancement were faculty interaction, authenticity, student-to-student engagement, feedback, multimedia, and homework. Through an evaluation of the quality of the courses and satisfaction, design standards could be established, resulting in quality-of-life enhancement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生作为消费者:通过设计以学习者为中心的价值课程留住工科学生
摘要全球经济对工程师的依赖因缺乏合格的工程师而加剧。大多数工程专业的学生没有完成证书。根据美国工程教育学会(2018)的数据,高辍学率与学习体验的满意度相关。本研究选择了西南一所大型大学为成人学习者设计的国际加速混合远程课程进行调查,该课程需要重新设计课程。研究人员希望确定满意度和学生参与度的关键组成部分,然后开发一个公平的教学设计模型。混合方法研究以探究共同体的三个要素为理论视角。该研究试图确定可以提高满意度和降低辍学率的关键课程特征。研究了设计组成部分、等级和满意度。对绩效数据(成绩)进行了检查,结果表明成绩和满意度之间没有显著相关性。六个建议改进的领域是教师互动、真实性、学生对学生的参与、反馈、多媒体和家庭作业。通过对课程质量和满意度的评估,可以制定设计标准,从而提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Continuing Higher Education
Journal of Continuing Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nontraditional Students and Credit for Prior Learning—Analytical Thinking, Clout, Drives, and Motives The Relations Among Math Anxiety, Math Self-Construct, and Math Achievement in Older and Underserved Minority Students Examining the Perception of Military Culture in the Undergraduate University Classroom The Formation and Benefits of Communal Cohorts in an EdD Program Notes and Trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1