A Trauma Reading of Isaiah 1–12 from the “Unity Movement” Perspective

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal for Semitics Pub Date : 2023-07-13 DOI:10.25159/2663-6573/12888
A. Groenewald, Elsa Esterhuizen
{"title":"A Trauma Reading of Isaiah 1–12 from the “Unity Movement” Perspective","authors":"A. Groenewald, Elsa Esterhuizen","doi":"10.25159/2663-6573/12888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution we focus firstly on the “unity movement” which has changed the face of Isaianic studies over the last 30 or more years, having been characterised by the Duhmian interpretation of three separate books for nearly 100 years. The unity movement focusses on the book of Isaiah as a literary unity, but it does not deny the historical growth of this literary masterpiece which took place over centuries. Secondly, we give a brief overview of the use of trauma theory as a reading lens in biblical studies and its implication for reading the book of Isaiah in this manner. In the third part we focus on three themes which are important from the perspective of the unity of the book of Isaiah (specifically in Isaiah 1–12 which is the first major subsection within the larger composition of the book of Isaiah). These three themes are important for a trauma reading of the book of Isaiah, as will be indicated in this contribution: the concept of the we-group (remnant), the woe oracles, and the theme of the “day of YHWH // this day.” These themes are briefly dealt with within Isaiah 1–12, although they have major implications for a more detailed study of the book of Isaiah (read as a literary unity) from a trauma theoretical perspective.","PeriodicalId":42047,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Semitics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Semitics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/12888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this contribution we focus firstly on the “unity movement” which has changed the face of Isaianic studies over the last 30 or more years, having been characterised by the Duhmian interpretation of three separate books for nearly 100 years. The unity movement focusses on the book of Isaiah as a literary unity, but it does not deny the historical growth of this literary masterpiece which took place over centuries. Secondly, we give a brief overview of the use of trauma theory as a reading lens in biblical studies and its implication for reading the book of Isaiah in this manner. In the third part we focus on three themes which are important from the perspective of the unity of the book of Isaiah (specifically in Isaiah 1–12 which is the first major subsection within the larger composition of the book of Isaiah). These three themes are important for a trauma reading of the book of Isaiah, as will be indicated in this contribution: the concept of the we-group (remnant), the woe oracles, and the theme of the “day of YHWH // this day.” These themes are briefly dealt with within Isaiah 1–12, although they have major implications for a more detailed study of the book of Isaiah (read as a literary unity) from a trauma theoretical perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从“团结运动”看以赛亚书1-12的创伤解读
在这篇文章中,我们首先关注“统一运动”,它在过去30年或更长的时间里改变了以赛亚研究的面貌,在近100年的时间里,它的特点是对三本独立的书进行Duhmian式的解释。统一运动集中在以赛亚书作为一个文学统一,但它并不否认这一文学杰作的历史成长,这发生了几个世纪。其次,我们简要概述了创伤理论在圣经研究中的应用,以及它对以这种方式阅读以赛亚书的意义。在第三部分,我们关注三个主题,从以赛亚书的统一性来看,这三个主题很重要(特别是以赛亚书1-12章,这是以赛亚书整体的第一个主要部分)。这三个主题对于以赛亚书的创伤性阅读是重要的,正如这篇文章所指出的:我们群体(余民)的概念,灾难的预言,以及“耶和华的日子//这一天”的主题。这些主题在以赛亚书1-12章中被简要地处理,尽管它们对从创伤理论的角度更详细地研究以赛亚书(作为一个文学整体)有重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Semitics
Journal for Semitics HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults: A Case Report. Enheduanna, the “World’s First Author”: An Analysis of Ninmešarra (the Exaltation of Inanna) and Inninšagurra (Queen of Vast Heart) Textual Criticism, Literary Criticism, and State Capture: Returning 3 Reigns 12:24p–t to the Canon of Local African Communities Making Sense of Destruction: A Frame-Semantic Analysis of šḥt in the Hebrew Bible “Without Contraries Is No Progression”: William Blake’s Monistic Understanding of Theodicy as Reflected in His Engravings of the Book of Job
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1