Physical activities in Hong Kong kindergartens: A content analysis of the Quality Review reports

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Policy Futures in Education Pub Date : 2023-06-07 DOI:10.1177/14782103231182741
Thomas Fan, Alfredo Bautista, D. Chan
{"title":"Physical activities in Hong Kong kindergartens: A content analysis of the Quality Review reports","authors":"Thomas Fan, Alfredo Bautista, D. Chan","doi":"10.1177/14782103231182741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Hong Kong, the Education Bureau (EDB) is responsible for the quality assurance of kindergarten education services. EDB inspectors regularly conduct school visits to monitor kindergartens’ performance and publish a Quality Review (QR) report for each kindergarten. Given the limited research on pedagogical practices pertaining to physical activities in Hong Kong kindergartens, the current study analyzes the content concerning this learning area in the QR reports. We analyzed 164 QR reports (published between 2017 and 2020) according to four analytic dimensions: (1) Overall presence of content pertaining to physical activities; (2) References to specific forms of physical activities; (3) Positive feedback; and (4) Negative feedback and recommendations. The presence of physical activities in the QR reports was found to be low (5% on average). EDB inspectors alluded to physical activities generically, not specifying the motor skill(s) at hand. Both positive and negative feedback focused primarily on matters pertaining to the time of exposure to physical activities and teachers’ pedagogical quality. Our evidence suggests the existence of potential gaps between Hong Kong’s kindergarten policies and actual physical activity practices. Further professional development seems necessary to strengthen both teachers’ pedagogies and inspectors’ understandings of physical activities.","PeriodicalId":46984,"journal":{"name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Futures in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103231182741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In Hong Kong, the Education Bureau (EDB) is responsible for the quality assurance of kindergarten education services. EDB inspectors regularly conduct school visits to monitor kindergartens’ performance and publish a Quality Review (QR) report for each kindergarten. Given the limited research on pedagogical practices pertaining to physical activities in Hong Kong kindergartens, the current study analyzes the content concerning this learning area in the QR reports. We analyzed 164 QR reports (published between 2017 and 2020) according to four analytic dimensions: (1) Overall presence of content pertaining to physical activities; (2) References to specific forms of physical activities; (3) Positive feedback; and (4) Negative feedback and recommendations. The presence of physical activities in the QR reports was found to be low (5% on average). EDB inspectors alluded to physical activities generically, not specifying the motor skill(s) at hand. Both positive and negative feedback focused primarily on matters pertaining to the time of exposure to physical activities and teachers’ pedagogical quality. Our evidence suggests the existence of potential gaps between Hong Kong’s kindergarten policies and actual physical activity practices. Further professional development seems necessary to strengthen both teachers’ pedagogies and inspectors’ understandings of physical activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
香港幼儿园体育活动质量评价报告内容分析
在香港,教育局负责幼稚园教育服务的质素保证。教育局督察定期巡视学校,监察幼稚园的表现,并为每间幼稚园发表质素检讨报告。鉴于对香港幼儿园体育活动教学实践的研究有限,本研究分析了QR报告中有关该学习领域的内容。我们根据四个分析维度分析了164份QR报告(2017年至2020年间发布):(1)与体育活动有关的内容的总体存在;(2) 提及具体形式的体育活动;(3) 积极反馈;(4)负面反馈和建议。QR报告中身体活动的出现率较低(平均为5%)。EDB检查员一般性地提到了体育活动,但没有具体说明手头的运动技能。正面和负面反馈主要集中在与体育活动时间和教师教学质量有关的问题上。我们的证据表明,香港幼儿园政策与实际体育活动实践之间存在潜在差距。进一步的专业发展似乎是必要的,以加强教师的教学法和检查员对体育活动的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Policy Futures in Education
Policy Futures in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
An analysis of Australian teacher workforce policy: Challenges and opportunities for teacher recruitment and retention Guest editorial: Considering the global-local relationships in education Perpetual emergency education: Urban refugee education in Thailand is disrupted during the COVID-19 Governance dynamics and local autonomy in large-scale governmental funding: The case of Sweden’s campaign to improve equity Tracing neoliberal discourse in school documentation. The analysis of educational projects in Barcelona state schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1