Systematic review: Factors influencing creativity in the design discipline and assessment criteria

Dai Zetian, Wee Hoe Tan, Ren Shumin, Zhang Menglin, Mansour Amini, Wang Shoushan
{"title":"Systematic review: Factors influencing creativity in the design discipline and assessment criteria","authors":"Dai Zetian, Wee Hoe Tan, Ren Shumin, Zhang Menglin, Mansour Amini, Wang Shoushan","doi":"10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using psychological instrument to measure creativity is getting popular in design research. However, unlike quantifying general creativity using divergent thinking, the complexity and interdisciplinarity of the design discipline have made it difficult to explore research on design creativity. Therefore, to better quantify and measure design creativity, 31 relevant studies were retrieved by Google Scholar and the University of London Common Research in this article. This study summarizes the factors that influence design creativity in different design disciplines, the rules for setting the internal dimensions, and the valid instruments for measuring design creativity. The factors affecting design creativity can be divided into internal factors (aesthetic, spatial ability, and ambiguity tolerance) and external factors (environment and visual stimulation). Among these factors, different instruments and evaluation criteria considerably impact the result, while the measurement of design creativity is still not mature enough. A single scale evaluation or creative task evaluation cannot comprehensively evaluate the design creativity, which consists of aesthetic, functional, and technical aspects. In addition, the reference value of ordinary creativity remains to be further discussed in design. Under some professional design fields, the effect of widely recognized factors closely related to creativity, such as divergent thinking, imagination, and personality, is insignificant.","PeriodicalId":52277,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using psychological instrument to measure creativity is getting popular in design research. However, unlike quantifying general creativity using divergent thinking, the complexity and interdisciplinarity of the design discipline have made it difficult to explore research on design creativity. Therefore, to better quantify and measure design creativity, 31 relevant studies were retrieved by Google Scholar and the University of London Common Research in this article. This study summarizes the factors that influence design creativity in different design disciplines, the rules for setting the internal dimensions, and the valid instruments for measuring design creativity. The factors affecting design creativity can be divided into internal factors (aesthetic, spatial ability, and ambiguity tolerance) and external factors (environment and visual stimulation). Among these factors, different instruments and evaluation criteria considerably impact the result, while the measurement of design creativity is still not mature enough. A single scale evaluation or creative task evaluation cannot comprehensively evaluate the design creativity, which consists of aesthetic, functional, and technical aspects. In addition, the reference value of ordinary creativity remains to be further discussed in design. Under some professional design fields, the effect of widely recognized factors closely related to creativity, such as divergent thinking, imagination, and personality, is insignificant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统评价:影响设计学科创造力的因素和评估标准
在设计研究中,使用心理仪器来测量创造力越来越受欢迎。然而,与使用发散思维来量化一般创造力不同,设计学科的复杂性和跨学科性使得探索设计创造力的研究变得困难。因此,为了更好地量化和衡量设计创意,谷歌学者和伦敦大学共同研究中心在本文中检索了31项相关研究。本研究总结了不同设计学科中影响设计创造力的因素、内部维度的设置规则以及衡量设计创造力的有效工具。影响设计创意的因素可分为内部因素(审美、空间能力和歧义容忍度)和外部因素(环境和视觉刺激)。在这些因素中,不同的工具和评价标准对结果有很大影响,而对设计创意的衡量还不够成熟。单一的量表评价或创意任务评价不能全面评价设计创意,设计创意包括美学、功能和技术三个方面。此外,普通创意的参考价值还有待于设计中进一步探讨。在一些专业设计领域,与创造力密切相关的广泛公认因素,如发散思维、想象力和个性,其影响是微不足道的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
242
期刊最新文献
Budget Planning and Defense Practices adopted by Principals of Public Secondary Schools for Effective Financial Management in Delta State, Nigeria Education and Community Development in Contemporary Ogoni Society Soft Skills and Mathematics Teacher’s Job Performance in Public Senior Secondary Schools in Ikwerre Local Government Area Functional Language: A Panacea for Effective Implementation of the Primary School Social Studies Curriculum Enrolment Planning and Class Allocation Practices Utilized by Principals as Correlates of Students Population Management in Public Secondary Schools in Delta State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1