Correction: La technique du « vous êtes libre de… » : induction d’un sentiment de liberté et soumission à une requête ou le paradoxe d’une liberté manipulatrice
{"title":"Correction: La technique du « vous êtes libre de… » : induction d’un sentiment de liberté et soumission à une requête ou le paradoxe d’une liberté manipulatrice","authors":"A. Pascual","doi":"10.5334/IRSP.303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article details a correction to the article: Pascual, A., & Gueguen, N. (2002). La technique du « vous etes libre de… » : induction d’un sentiment de liberte et soumission a une requete ou le paradoxe d’une liberte manipulatrice [The « You are free of… » technique: induction of a feeling of freedom and compliance in a request or the paradox of a manipulating freedom]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 51–80. Resume Cet article est une correction de l’article : Pascual, A., & Gueguen, N. (2002). La technique du « vous etes libre de… » : induction d’un sentiment de liberte et soumission a une requete ou le paradoxe d’une liberte manipulatrice [The « You are free of… » technique: induction of a feeling of freedom and compliance in a request or the paradox of a manipulating freedom]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 51–80.","PeriodicalId":45461,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/IRSP.303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This article details a correction to the article: Pascual, A., & Gueguen, N. (2002). La technique du « vous etes libre de… » : induction d’un sentiment de liberte et soumission a une requete ou le paradoxe d’une liberte manipulatrice [The « You are free of… » technique: induction of a feeling of freedom and compliance in a request or the paradox of a manipulating freedom]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 51–80. Resume Cet article est une correction de l’article : Pascual, A., & Gueguen, N. (2002). La technique du « vous etes libre de… » : induction d’un sentiment de liberte et soumission a une requete ou le paradoxe d’une liberte manipulatrice [The « You are free of… » technique: induction of a feeling of freedom and compliance in a request or the paradox of a manipulating freedom]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 51–80.
这篇文章详细介绍了对这篇文章的修改:Pascual, a ., & Gueguen, N.(2002)。«...空闲的人你的技术»:感应的自由感,并且提交了一个请求或操纵性自由的悖论》[The«You are free of ...»:诱导技术顺应了歌of freedom and in a request黄金a manipulating The paradox of freedom)。国际社会心理学评论,15(1),51 - 80。本文是对Pascual, A., & Gueguen, N.(2002)的文章的修正。«...空闲的人你的技术»:感应的自由感,并且提交了一个请求或操纵性自由的悖论》[The«You are free of ...»:诱导技术顺应了歌of freedom and in a request黄金a manipulating The paradox of freedom)。国际社会心理学评论,15(1),51 - 80。
期刊介绍:
The International Review of Social Psychology (IRSP) is supported by the Association pour la Diffusion de la Recherche Internationale en Psychologie Sociale (A.D.R.I.P.S.). The International Review of Social Psychology publishes empirical research and theoretical notes in all areas of social psychology. Articles are written preferably in English but can also be written in French. The journal was created to reflect research advances in a field where theoretical and fundamental questions inevitably convey social significance and implications. It emphasizes scientific quality of its publications in every area of social psychology. Any kind of research can be considered, as long as the results significantly enhance the understanding of a general social psychological phenomenon and the methodology is appropriate.