To compare creatinine estimation by jaffe and enzymatic method

S. Augustin, R. Deshpande, Girish K. Shanthaveeranna
{"title":"To compare creatinine estimation by jaffe and enzymatic method","authors":"S. Augustin, R. Deshpande, Girish K. Shanthaveeranna","doi":"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_34_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Creatinine in urine and serum are used in the assessment of renal function. It is commonly estimated by Jaffe's and enzymatic method. In many institutions, serum creatinine is estimated by (POCT) Point of care testing device (Enzymatic method) and follow-up of the patients with creatinine results by other methods, analyzed in the Biochemistry laboratory. If the results of POCT do not correlate with the Jaffe method, it leads to differences in serum creatinine values and wrong treatment decisions during the follow-up of the patients. Hence, this study was done to know the difference between the two methods in a tertiary care hospital. Aim and Objective: To estimate creatinine by Jaffe's and enzymatic method and to compare the serum creatinine values between the two methods. Materials and Methods: It is an observational cross-sectional study, for a period of 17 months from November 2018 to March 2020. Seventy-five samples were analyzed for serum creatinine by Jaffe's method in the Biochemistry laboratory and by enzymatic method in the emergency department in POCT device. Results: Mean differences between Jaffe's and enzymatic method were −0.063 mg/dL, 0.070 mg/dL, 0.198 mg/dL, and 0.0685 in Group I, II, III, and all the groups together. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient including all the three groups (0.995) indicates a very good correlation between the two methods. Conclusion: Our study showed a good agreement and good correlation between the two methods, which is similar to other studies analyzed on same instrument.","PeriodicalId":10321,"journal":{"name":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"66 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_34_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Creatinine in urine and serum are used in the assessment of renal function. It is commonly estimated by Jaffe's and enzymatic method. In many institutions, serum creatinine is estimated by (POCT) Point of care testing device (Enzymatic method) and follow-up of the patients with creatinine results by other methods, analyzed in the Biochemistry laboratory. If the results of POCT do not correlate with the Jaffe method, it leads to differences in serum creatinine values and wrong treatment decisions during the follow-up of the patients. Hence, this study was done to know the difference between the two methods in a tertiary care hospital. Aim and Objective: To estimate creatinine by Jaffe's and enzymatic method and to compare the serum creatinine values between the two methods. Materials and Methods: It is an observational cross-sectional study, for a period of 17 months from November 2018 to March 2020. Seventy-five samples were analyzed for serum creatinine by Jaffe's method in the Biochemistry laboratory and by enzymatic method in the emergency department in POCT device. Results: Mean differences between Jaffe's and enzymatic method were −0.063 mg/dL, 0.070 mg/dL, 0.198 mg/dL, and 0.0685 in Group I, II, III, and all the groups together. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient including all the three groups (0.995) indicates a very good correlation between the two methods. Conclusion: Our study showed a good agreement and good correlation between the two methods, which is similar to other studies analyzed on same instrument.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
jaffe法和酶法测定肌酸酐的比较
引言:尿和血清中的肌酐用于评估肾功能。它通常通过贾菲和酶法来估计。在许多机构中,血清肌酐是通过(POCT)护理点检测设备(酶法)估计的,并通过其他方法对患者的肌酐结果进行随访,在生物化学实验室进行分析。如果POCT的结果与Jaffe方法不相关,则会导致患者随访期间血清肌酐值的差异和错误的治疗决定。因此,本研究是为了了解这两种方法在三级护理医院中的差异。目的:用Jaffe法和酶法测定肌酸酐,并比较两种方法的血清肌酸酐值。材料和方法:这是一项观察性横断面研究,从2018年11月到2020年3月,为期17个月。在生物化学实验室采用Jaffe法,在急诊科采用酶法,在POCT设备中对75份样本进行血清肌酐分析。结果:在第一组、第二组、第三组以及所有组中,Jaffe法和酶法之间的平均差异分别为−0.063 mg/dL、0.070 mg/dL和0.198 mg/dL,以及0.0685。包括所有三组在内的总体组内相关系数(0.995)表明两种方法之间具有非常好的相关性。结论:我们的研究显示两种方法之间有很好的一致性和相关性,这与在同一仪器上分析的其他研究相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Standardization of objective structured practical examination in terms of validity and reliability in biochemistry: Our first experience Occupational stress: An impediment to quality nurse–Patient relationship – A rapid review COVID-19 positivity in the COVID suspect and green zones of a large emergency department during the first wave of the pandemic in South India Healthcare-seeking behavior and awareness regarding snakebites and its first-aid management among tribal women in rural Maharashtra Hippocratic oath in dentistry: An insight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1