Organizational injustice and employee affective health: The moderating effects of labor market conditions

IF 7.3 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2023.08.005
Abiola Sarnecki , Marjo-Riitta Diehl , Ansgar Richter
{"title":"Organizational injustice and employee affective health: The moderating effects of labor market conditions","authors":"Abiola Sarnecki ,&nbsp;Marjo-Riitta Diehl ,&nbsp;Ansgar Richter","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2023.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing research confirms that both organizational injustice and unfavorable labor market conditions negatively influence employee health. This article draws on relative gratification theory and cognitive appraisal theory to investigate the interplay of these two work-related stressors. The findings of a meta-analysis of 97 samples from 24 countries shows that when unemployment is high and there is a large informal economy, organizational injustice has a weaker effect on employee affective health than when unemployment is low. The findings suggest that relative gratification can function as a coping mechanism when employees are challenged with multiple work-related stressors. In so doing, this study extends the present understanding of the effects of relative gratification, thereby highlighting the broad scope of social comparisons in organizational justice research. It illustrates how micro- and macro-level stressors interact to influence employee health and confirms the importance of context in organizational justice research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"42 6","pages":"Pages 883-893"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323001081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing research confirms that both organizational injustice and unfavorable labor market conditions negatively influence employee health. This article draws on relative gratification theory and cognitive appraisal theory to investigate the interplay of these two work-related stressors. The findings of a meta-analysis of 97 samples from 24 countries shows that when unemployment is high and there is a large informal economy, organizational injustice has a weaker effect on employee affective health than when unemployment is low. The findings suggest that relative gratification can function as a coping mechanism when employees are challenged with multiple work-related stressors. In so doing, this study extends the present understanding of the effects of relative gratification, thereby highlighting the broad scope of social comparisons in organizational justice research. It illustrates how micro- and macro-level stressors interact to influence employee health and confirms the importance of context in organizational justice research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织不公平与员工情感健康:劳动力市场条件的调节作用
现有研究证实,组织不公正和不利的劳动力市场条件对员工健康都有负面影响。本文利用相对满足理论和认知评价理论来研究这两种工作压力源的相互作用。对来自24个国家的97个样本进行荟萃分析的结果表明,当失业率高且存在大量非正规经济时,组织不公正对员工情感健康的影响要弱于失业率低时。研究结果表明,当员工面临多重工作压力时,相对满足可以作为一种应对机制。通过这样做,本研究扩展了目前对相对满足影响的理解,从而突出了组织公正研究中社会比较的广泛范围。它说明了微观和宏观层面的压力源如何相互作用影响员工健康,并证实了情境在组织公平研究中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Examining stakeholder reactions to corporate social irresponsibility: Evidence from social media Exploring the moderating effect of family communication patterns on the family CEO characteristics – family firm internationalization relationship Conceptualizing inclusive marketing: A synthesis of theory and practice Behavioral strategy in evolution: A review and conceptual framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1