Love Is Not a Panacea: Moderating Role of Followers’ Attachment Dimensions on the Effectiveness of Agape-Based Leadership

IF 0.5 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Human Values Pub Date : 2022-11-12 DOI:10.1177/09716858221133148
Fallan Kirby Carvalho, Zubin R. Mulla
{"title":"Love Is Not a Panacea: Moderating Role of Followers’ Attachment Dimensions on the Effectiveness of Agape-Based Leadership","authors":"Fallan Kirby Carvalho, Zubin R. Mulla","doi":"10.1177/09716858221133148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Love (in the agape form) forms the foundation of most leadership concepts and has been ignored in research. We respond to the debate on universal applicability of leadership forms by bringing followers into the spotlight through our examination of the interactive influence of loving (agape-based) and non-loving (non-agape-based) leadership styles and followers’ attachment dimensions (self-model and other-model) on follower outcomes. Two hundred and eighty-two business management students worked in teams on a task under the direction of leaders who demonstrated agape-based behaviours and leaders who demonstrated non-agape-based behaviours in a laboratory experiment. Agape-based leadership was positively related with follower satisfaction with the leader, team commitment and perception of leaders’ effectiveness. Further, followers’ attachment dimensions (self- and other-model) moderated the relationship between agape-based leadership and follower work attitudes, such that the relationship was positive for followers with a negative self-model and for followers with a positive other-model, and the relationship was negative for followers with a negative other-model. We provide a practical set of tools for demonstrating agape leadership behaviours which are useful for educators and organizations. We suggest that leaders must alter their leadership style depending on their followers’ attachment dimensions.","PeriodicalId":44074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Values","volume":"29 1","pages":"58 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09716858221133148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Love (in the agape form) forms the foundation of most leadership concepts and has been ignored in research. We respond to the debate on universal applicability of leadership forms by bringing followers into the spotlight through our examination of the interactive influence of loving (agape-based) and non-loving (non-agape-based) leadership styles and followers’ attachment dimensions (self-model and other-model) on follower outcomes. Two hundred and eighty-two business management students worked in teams on a task under the direction of leaders who demonstrated agape-based behaviours and leaders who demonstrated non-agape-based behaviours in a laboratory experiment. Agape-based leadership was positively related with follower satisfaction with the leader, team commitment and perception of leaders’ effectiveness. Further, followers’ attachment dimensions (self- and other-model) moderated the relationship between agape-based leadership and follower work attitudes, such that the relationship was positive for followers with a negative self-model and for followers with a positive other-model, and the relationship was negative for followers with a negative other-model. We provide a practical set of tools for demonstrating agape leadership behaviours which are useful for educators and organizations. We suggest that leaders must alter their leadership style depending on their followers’ attachment dimensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱不是万灵药:追随者依恋维度对agape型领导有效性的调节作用
爱(以阿加佩的形式)构成了大多数领导概念的基础,在研究中被忽视了。我们通过研究爱(基于阿加佩)和不爱(非阿加佩)的领导风格以及追随者的依恋维度(自我模型和其他模型)对追随者结果的互动影响,将追随者带到聚光灯下,以回应关于领导形式普遍适用性的争论。在实验室实验中,282名商业管理专业的学生在表现出基于琼脂的行为的领导者和表现出非琼脂行为的领导者的指导下,分组完成一项任务。阿加佩领导与追随者对领导者的满意度、团队承诺和对领导者有效性的感知呈正相关。此外,追随者的依恋维度(自我和其他模型)调节了基于agape的领导和追随者工作态度之间的关系,因此,消极自我模型的追随者和积极其他模型的追随者的关系是积极的,消极其他模型的跟随者的关系是消极的。我们提供了一套实用的工具来展示agape领导行为,这对教育工作者和组织都很有用。我们建议领导者必须根据追随者的依恋维度来改变他们的领导风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Values
Journal of Human Values SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Values is a peer-reviewed tri-annual journal devoted to research on values. Communicating across manifold knowledge traditions and geographies, it presents cutting-edge scholarship on the study of values encompassing a wide range of disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. Reading values broadly, the journal seeks to encourage and foster a meaningful conversation among scholars for whom values are no esoteric resources to be archived uncritically from the past. Moving beyond cultural boundaries, the Journal looks at values as something that animates the contemporary in its myriad manifestations: politics and public affairs, business and corporations, global institutions and local organisations, and the personal and the private.
期刊最新文献
Attaining Sustainability via Shrimad Bhagavad Gita: An Empirical Study of Identified Variables, Self-Efficacy, Goal Performance and Leadership Effectiveness Book review: Plato, The Republic. Translated by Benjamin Jowett Which Golden Rule of Ethics? The Emotion in Early Buddhist Psychology of Human Values Transformative Learning with Wangari Maathai: Fostering Environmental Education and Sustainability Through the Green Picturebook Seeds of Change: Planting a Path to Peace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1