Endoscopy in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

IF 0.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Digestive Endoscopy Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1739567
P. Pal, D. Reddy, M. Tandan
{"title":"Endoscopy in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review","authors":"P. Pal, D. Reddy, M. Tandan","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1739567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Fetomaternal outcomes are of primary concern for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy in pregnancy. We aimed to systematically review the safety and utility of endoscopic procedures in pregnancy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All original research articles with sample size > 10 involving endoscopy in pregnancy were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 1948 to July 2021. Results After screening 12,197 references, 216 citations were found and finally 66 references were included. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy had favorable fetal outcome (>95%) based on two large retrospective studies and a review of case reports. Sclerotherapy and band ligation of varices were safe according to case series. A large nationwide cohort study established safety of endotherapy for nonvariceal bleed. Botulinum toxin and pneumatic dilation in achalasia are only supported by case reports. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy can be useful to support nutrition based on case reports. A retrospective case–control and cohort study with systemic review justified flexible sigmoidoscopy if strongly indicated. Low birth weight was more common when sigmoidoscopy was done in inflammatory bowel disease based on a prospective study. Colonoscopy was considered safe in second trimester based on a case–control study whereas it can be performed otherwise only in presence of strong indication like malignancy. Capsule endoscopy is promising and can be useful in acute small bowel bleeding although risk of capsule retention is unknown. There are no reports of enteroscopy in pregnancy. Twelve retrospective studies and one prospective study showed high success rate of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (> 90%) in all trimesters and can be performed if strongly indicated. Pregnancy was an independent risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis in a large nationwide case–control study. Radiation-free ERCP with wire-guided bile observation, stent-guided or precut sphincterotomy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance, and spyscopy have been described. Safety of EUS is limited to case series and can be used in intermediate probability of choledocholithiasis to guide ERCP and endoscopic cystogastrostomy. Conclusion This review concludes that GI endoscopy during pregnancy can be done effectively if strongly indicated with good fetomaternal outcomes. Precautions are advocated during procedures where radiation exposure is expected.","PeriodicalId":43098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"12 1","pages":"138 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Fetomaternal outcomes are of primary concern for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy in pregnancy. We aimed to systematically review the safety and utility of endoscopic procedures in pregnancy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All original research articles with sample size > 10 involving endoscopy in pregnancy were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 1948 to July 2021. Results After screening 12,197 references, 216 citations were found and finally 66 references were included. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy had favorable fetal outcome (>95%) based on two large retrospective studies and a review of case reports. Sclerotherapy and band ligation of varices were safe according to case series. A large nationwide cohort study established safety of endotherapy for nonvariceal bleed. Botulinum toxin and pneumatic dilation in achalasia are only supported by case reports. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy can be useful to support nutrition based on case reports. A retrospective case–control and cohort study with systemic review justified flexible sigmoidoscopy if strongly indicated. Low birth weight was more common when sigmoidoscopy was done in inflammatory bowel disease based on a prospective study. Colonoscopy was considered safe in second trimester based on a case–control study whereas it can be performed otherwise only in presence of strong indication like malignancy. Capsule endoscopy is promising and can be useful in acute small bowel bleeding although risk of capsule retention is unknown. There are no reports of enteroscopy in pregnancy. Twelve retrospective studies and one prospective study showed high success rate of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (> 90%) in all trimesters and can be performed if strongly indicated. Pregnancy was an independent risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis in a large nationwide case–control study. Radiation-free ERCP with wire-guided bile observation, stent-guided or precut sphincterotomy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance, and spyscopy have been described. Safety of EUS is limited to case series and can be used in intermediate probability of choledocholithiasis to guide ERCP and endoscopic cystogastrostomy. Conclusion This review concludes that GI endoscopy during pregnancy can be done effectively if strongly indicated with good fetomaternal outcomes. Precautions are advocated during procedures where radiation exposure is expected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期内窥镜检查:系统综述
背景胎儿结局是妊娠期胃肠(GI)内镜检查的主要关注点。我们的目的是系统地回顾内镜手术在妊娠中的安全性和实用性。方法利用PubMed进行系统的文献检索。所有样本量为bbbb10的涉及妊娠内窥镜检查的原创研究文章,以及1948年至2021年7月描述新颖/罕见技术的病例报告/系列,均被纳入本综述。结果共筛选文献12197篇,发现文献216篇,最终纳入文献66篇。根据两项大型回顾性研究和对病例报告的回顾,食管胃十二指肠镜检查有良好的胎儿结局(>95%)。根据病例系列,硬化治疗和静脉曲张结扎是安全的。一项大型全国性队列研究确定了非静脉曲张出血的内皮治疗的安全性。肉毒杆菌毒素和气动扩张在贲门失弛缓症只有病例报告支持。根据病例报告,经皮内镜胃造口术可用于支持营养。有系统评价的回顾性病例对照和队列研究证明,如果有强烈的适应症,柔性乙状结肠镜检查是合理的。根据一项前瞻性研究,在炎性肠病患者中乙状结肠镜检查时,低出生体重更为常见。根据一项病例对照研究,结肠镜检查在妊娠中期被认为是安全的,而只有在存在恶性肿瘤等强烈指征时才可以进行结肠镜检查。胶囊内窥镜是很有前途的,可以用于急性小肠出血,尽管胶囊潴留的风险尚不清楚。没有关于怀孕期间进行肠镜检查的报道。12项回顾性研究和1项前瞻性研究显示,治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)在所有妊娠期的成功率都很高(bbb90 %),如果有强烈的适应症,可以进行。在一项大型全国病例对照研究中,妊娠是ercp后胰腺炎的独立危险因素。无辐射ERCP伴钢丝引导胆汁观察、支架引导或预切括约肌切开术、超声内镜(EUS)引导和镜下检查。EUS的安全性仅限于病例序列,可用于胆总管结石的中等概率指导ERCP和内镜下囊胃造口术。结论妊娠期胃肠内镜检查是有效的,如果适应症强且胎母结局良好。在可能会接触辐射的手术过程中,建议采取预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
28.60%
发文量
35
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digestive Endoscopy (JDE) is the official publication of the Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India that has over 1500 members. The society comprises of several key clinicians in this field from different parts of the country and has key international speakers in its advisory board. JDE is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, print and online journal publishing quarterly. It focuses on original investigations, reviews, case reports and clinical images as well as key investigations including but not limited to cholangiopancreatography, fluoroscopy, capsule endoscopy etc.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Polyp Detection and Characterization Accidental Ingestion of Live Ants Linear Endoscopic Ultrasound Examination of the Biliary System and Its Clinical Applications Pill Esophagitis: Clinical and Endoscopic Profile Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopic Polyp Detection and Characterization: Merging Computer Technology and Endoscopic Skill for Better Patient Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1