Four Galore? The Overlap between Mary Douglas’s Grid-Group Typology and Other Highly Cited Social Science Classifications

IF 4.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Theory Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1177/0735275120946085
M. Verweij, P. Alexandrova, Henrik Jacobsen, P. Béziat, Diana M. Branduse, Yonca Dege, J. Hensing, James Hollway, Lea Kliem, Gabriela Ponce, Inga Reichelt, Mareile Wiegmann
{"title":"Four Galore? The Overlap between Mary Douglas’s Grid-Group Typology and Other Highly Cited Social Science Classifications","authors":"M. Verweij, P. Alexandrova, Henrik Jacobsen, P. Béziat, Diana M. Branduse, Yonca Dege, J. Hensing, James Hollway, Lea Kliem, Gabriela Ponce, Inga Reichelt, Mareile Wiegmann","doi":"10.1177/0735275120946085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, neuroscientists have argued that elementary ways of organizing, perceiving, and justifying social relations lurk behind the diversity of social life. In developing grid-group typology, anthropologist Mary Douglas proposed such universal forms. If these are universal, then we could expect other widely cited classifications to overlap with grid-group typology. We tested this expectation by examining to which extent the elements of Douglas’s typology overlap with those of 39 highly influential classifications proposed since 1970. We established overlap by calculating the interrater agreement among 11 coders. Fair to good interrater agreement, despite a complex coding exercise and minimal training, suggests that such overlap exists. Nevertheless, limits to our research design call for further studies. These findings should contribute to a rekindling of the question whether universal forms of organizing and perceiving social relations exist and to a further consideration of whether Douglas has managed to uncover these.","PeriodicalId":48131,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0735275120946085","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120946085","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Recently, neuroscientists have argued that elementary ways of organizing, perceiving, and justifying social relations lurk behind the diversity of social life. In developing grid-group typology, anthropologist Mary Douglas proposed such universal forms. If these are universal, then we could expect other widely cited classifications to overlap with grid-group typology. We tested this expectation by examining to which extent the elements of Douglas’s typology overlap with those of 39 highly influential classifications proposed since 1970. We established overlap by calculating the interrater agreement among 11 coders. Fair to good interrater agreement, despite a complex coding exercise and minimal training, suggests that such overlap exists. Nevertheless, limits to our research design call for further studies. These findings should contribute to a rekindling of the question whether universal forms of organizing and perceiving social relations exist and to a further consideration of whether Douglas has managed to uncover these.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四的?玛丽·道格拉斯的网格群类型学与其他高引用的社会科学分类之间的重叠
最近,神经科学家认为,组织、感知和证明社会关系的基本方式隐藏在社会生活的多样性背后。在发展网格群类型学时,人类学家玛丽·道格拉斯提出了这种普遍形式。如果这些是普遍的,那么我们可以期待其他被广泛引用的分类与网格群类型学重叠。我们通过检查道格拉斯的类型学元素与1970年以来提出的39种极具影响力的分类在多大程度上重叠来检验这一期望。我们通过计算11个编码器之间的译码器协议来确定重叠。尽管进行了复杂的编码练习和最少的培训,但通译人员的一致意见表明存在这种重叠。然而,我们研究设计的局限性需要进一步的研究。这些发现应该有助于重新点燃这个问题,即组织和感知社会关系的普遍形式是否存在,并进一步考虑道格拉斯是否设法发现了这些。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociological Theory
Sociological Theory SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.80%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Published for the American Sociological Association, this important journal covers the full range of sociological theory - from ethnomethodology to world systems analysis, from commentaries on the classics to the latest cutting-edge ideas, and from re-examinations of neglected theorists to metatheoretical inquiries. Its themes and contributions are interdisciplinary, its orientation pluralistic, its pages open to commentary and debate. Renowned for publishing the best international research and scholarship, Sociological Theory is essential reading for sociologists and social theorists alike.
期刊最新文献
Rights Projects: A Relational Sociology of Rights in Globalization The Entangled Emergencies of COVID-19 Class Experience Mobility through Consumption, Work, and Relationships Relational Durkheim: Homo Duplex as the Foundation of a Formalist Cultural Sociology Stranger in the Mirror: Exploring Somatic Defamiliarization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1