“Just teach them the law!”: the ethics of value inculcation within legal education

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Law Teacher Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/03069400.2023.2246360
Alex Green
{"title":"“Just teach them the law!”: the ethics of value inculcation within legal education","authors":"Alex Green","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2023.2246360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To what extent should law teachers be permitted to advance controversial ethical, moral or political views as part of the LLB curriculum? This short paper grapples with that question by defending the ethical permissibility of such behaviour subject to the important proviso that it does not cause students “pedagogical harm”. In reaching this conclusion, three alternative views are considered and dismissed, each of which seeks either to eliminate value inculcation entirely or to restrict its scope to the moral-political values currently immanent within established law. The approach taken is argumentative, drawing upon analytical philosophy, with each contested and contestable view being presented in propositional form. Ultimately, it is concluded that value inculcation cannot be avoided within legal education and that, given this fact, the question becomes which values law teachers have a responsibility to advance. It is contended that this judgement, fraught though it might be for various reasons, is best left to individual teachers and that, for this reason among others, a permissive “no-harm” approach to value inculcation best justifies current pedagogical practices.","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":"57 1","pages":"390 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2023.2246360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT To what extent should law teachers be permitted to advance controversial ethical, moral or political views as part of the LLB curriculum? This short paper grapples with that question by defending the ethical permissibility of such behaviour subject to the important proviso that it does not cause students “pedagogical harm”. In reaching this conclusion, three alternative views are considered and dismissed, each of which seeks either to eliminate value inculcation entirely or to restrict its scope to the moral-political values currently immanent within established law. The approach taken is argumentative, drawing upon analytical philosophy, with each contested and contestable view being presented in propositional form. Ultimately, it is concluded that value inculcation cannot be avoided within legal education and that, given this fact, the question becomes which values law teachers have a responsibility to advance. It is contended that this judgement, fraught though it might be for various reasons, is best left to individual teachers and that, for this reason among others, a permissive “no-harm” approach to value inculcation best justifies current pedagogical practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“只要教他们法律!”:法律教育中的伦理价值灌输
摘要:法律教师在多大程度上应该被允许在法学学士课程中提出有争议的伦理、道德或政治观点?这篇短文通过捍卫这种行为的道德允许性来解决这个问题,但前提是它不会对学生造成“教学伤害”。在得出这一结论时,我们考虑并否定了三种不同的观点,每种观点都试图完全消除价值灌输,或者将其范围限制在现行法律中固有的道德政治价值观。所采取的方法是以分析哲学为基础的辩论性方法,每一种有争议和有争议的观点都以命题的形式呈现。最终,得出的结论是,在法律教育中,价值观灌输是不可避免的,鉴于这一事实,问题变成了法律教师有责任推进哪些价值观。有人认为,尽管出于各种原因,这种判断可能令人担忧,但最好留给个别教师,出于这个原因和其他原因,对价值灌输采取宽容的“无害”方法最能证明当前的教学实践是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Law Teacher
Law Teacher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Lawyers and the rule of law Lawyers and the rule of law , by Andrew Boon, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2022, 573 pp., £90 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-50992-521-6 A binate regulatory framework for the accreditation of law faculties in Nigerian universities: a necessity or overkill? Getting to maybe: how to excel on law school exams Getting to maybe: how to excel on law school exams , by Richard Michael Fischl and Jeremy R. Paul, Durham, NC, Carolina Academic Press, 2023, 474 pp., $45.00 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-59460-734-9 Law teachers’ adoption and acceptance of OBE: a case study of Hong Kong Storytelling: a five-tier framework and the flipped classroom approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1